Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of media on presidential elections
Impact of media on presidential elections
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of media on presidential elections
Presidential Debates Presidential debates are becoming a large part of a campaign plan. ("Where the voters are") Who would think that such a short confrontation between the candidates would sway the vote of so many viewers? A presidential campaign could be won or lost from a single debate. The candidate must keep their cool and not go over the edge; they must be have a strong stand point on all of the topics, don't avoid anything. When debates first started they did not have this much effect on the voters, but now that a debate can be heard over the internet and through the television voters don't have to put forth any effort. All of the necessary points are usually covered in the debate. The points are not the only things that affect a voter, the appearance of the candidate, his tone of voice and his overall preciseness of his plans and ideas. Though the more modern debates can some what be planned, debates are still believed to be the best possible way to see the candidate in action and not just reading or saying what everyone wants to hear. The spin doctors, sponsors, television and media are playing a much larger part in presidential debates these days but all of this still shows what the importance of the debate is. Spin Doctors Spin doctors, isn't that a strange name in politics and especially a presidential debate. No it is not the singing group called the Spin Doctors. In large debates a campaign will put together what they call a "spin squad", this is a group of several spin doctors. These people are actually a very vital part of any presidential debate. All of the spin doctors today are very powerful in the government and also paid a small chunk of money for going out and preaching their parties' candidate's bel... ... middle of paper ... ...ember 23, 1996: 1. Infotrac. Online. Gayle Group. April 15, 2000 Schneider, William. "And They're Better Than Many NBA Games." National Journal January 15, 2000: 11. Infotrac. Online. Gayle Group. April 15, 2000 Carlin, Diana. "Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments." Political Communication December 1992: 4. Infotrac. Online. Gayle Group. April 15, 2000 "Commission on Presidential Debates" 2000. Election 2000 Debates Online. 15 April 2000. "Vote America" 2000. The Debates. 15 April 2000. Kenadall, Kelly. "Presidential Debates Through Media Eyes." American Behavioral Scientist August 1997: 5. Infotrac. Online. Gayle Group. April 15, 2000 Morano, Marc. "Manipulating the voters from inside spin alley." Insight on the News November 4, 1996: 1. Infotrac. Online. Gayle Group. April 15, 2000 "Spin Doctors" 1996. 15 April 2000.
New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. 11 Jan. 2010. Web. 19 May 2010.
The New York Times. The New York Times, 15 Aug. 2013. Web. The Web.
Washington Times - Politics, Breaking News, US and World News. 6 Jan. 2010. Web. 16
concerning domestic questions, the second was centered around the area of foreign policy, and the third and fourth debates were basically a repetition of previous topics. During each debate four news representatives asked questions to each candidate. On September 26, 1960, the first debate took place in Chicago. The The moderator was Howard K. Smith, and his job was to introduce the candidates. and controlled the question and answer segments of the debates.
After this thorough analysis of broadcasts from both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party televised during the 2008 presidential election campaign, we can identify the most popular types of argumentative informal fallacies and how they can serve to appeal or attack the ethos, pathos and logos of an argument or the arguer himself or herself. It is important for the American electorate to be able to recognize them and dismiss them promptly, to abstain from making a decision as important as selecting the new president of the United States based on false or illogical arguments. Unfortunately, political parties and interest groups will continue to take advantage of these fallacies, it is up to the public to think critically in order to avoid being wrongly influenced or misguided by them. Works Cited BarackObamadotcom. James Taylor for Obama.
Americans have embraced debate since before we were a country. The idea that we would provide reasoned support for any position that we took is what made us different from the English king. Our love of debate came from the old country, and embedded itself in our culture as a defining value. Thus, it should not come as a surprise that the affinity for debate is still strong, and finds itself as a regular feature of the mainstream media. However, if Deborah Tannen of the New York Times is correct, our understanding of what it means to argue may be very different from what it once was; a “culture of critique” has developed within our media, and it relies on the exclusive opposition of two conflicting positions (Tannen). In her 1994 editorial, titled “The Triumph of the Yell”, Tannen claims that journalists, politicians and academics treat public discourse as an argument. Furthermore, she attempts to persuade her readers that this posturing of argument as a conflict leads to a battle, not a debate, and that we would be able to communicate the truth if this culture were not interfering. This paper will discuss the rhetorical strategies that Tannen utilizes, outline the support given in her editorial, and why her argument is less convincing than it should be.
Norton, E. H., Jacobus, C., & Clifton. (2013, December 30). Capitol Strategies - Presdent Interview. Fox News. (C. Payne, Interviewer)
New York Times. The New York Times Company, 23 Jan. 2010. Web. 22 Jan. 2014.
Chron.com. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web. The Web. 12 Feb. 2014.
...evision, viewership and ratings of presidential debates have been steadily decreasing over the past few years (Chart). According to Nelson Media Research, between 1960 and 1961 the ratings for presidential debates dropped from 59.5% to 31.6% and moreover dropped 62.4 million viewing to 46.1 million people viewing between the ’92 and ’96 elections alone (Chart).
Seelye, Katharine. “Lack of News Doesn’t Deter Coverage.” New York Times. N.p. 16 Oct. 2002. Web. 09 May 2013.
Louw, P. E. (2010). Spin Doctoring: The Art of Public Relations. The media and political process (2ed., p. 81). London: SAGE.
Huffington Post, 2013. http://huffingtonpost.com/ Web. The Web. The Web. 29 Nov 2013.
Edward L. Bernays deserves recognition far greater than that which he receives. "The father of spin" documents the career of Edward Bernays, the man himself and the monumental findings that precede him. Bernays not only fathered public relations as we know it he also shaped molded and embodied ideal practices of public relations and spin in everything that he did.