Relationship Between Class and Order Within Two Taxonomic Groups

1372 Words3 Pages

The subphylum Hexapoda, known for a common body structure consisting of the famous three pairs of legs, abdomen, thorax and head, is divided into two taxonomic groups: the Entognatha and the Ectognatha (Sasaki et al., 2013). Within the Entognatha are the orders Diplura, Collembola, and Protura (Sasaki et al., 2013). These are all wingless orders (Sasaki et al., 2013). The Entognatha are marked by an entognathy, which is seen as their mouthparts being further inside their head, being enclosed by extensions of the head (Reiger et al., 2004). Within the Ectognatha is the class Insecta (Sasaki et al., 2013). This is further subdivided into the orders Pterygota, Zygentoma, and Archaeognatha (Sasaki et al., 2013). Ectognatha are classified by an ectognathy, which is the presence of exposed mouths (Sasaki et al., 2013).

The relationships between each class and order within the two taxonomic groups are not concrete due to much dispute. After sequencing the ribosomal RNA of the orders Diplura, Protura, and Collumbola, it was found that Diplura is most closely related to Protura, making them sister groups (Luan et al., 2005). Together, these orders are termed “Nonoculata,” which is in reference to their lack of eye structures (Luan et al., 2005). It was also found that Collembola is most closely related to the Nonoculata, making them sister groups as well (Luan et al., 2005). Based on a study (Nardi et al., 2003) using amino acid sequencing data, the subphylum Hexapoda was considered diphyletic, or split into two main taxa (Reiger et al., 2004). These are the Entognatha taxonomic group and the Insecta class (Reiger et al., 2004). By using this sequence data, it was found that class Insecta are more closely related to the Crustacea subphyl...

... middle of paper ...

...red to the abundance of marine fossils of early Crustacea (Grimaldi, 2010). Despite this gap in the fossil record, the molecular evidence proving the evolutionary relationship between Hexapoda and Crustacea proves to be both compelling and consistent (Grimaldi, 2010).

Molecular and morphological data have been proven to be influential in determining the phylogenetic relationship of Hexapoda and its role in the scheme of evolution. However, when comparing different characteristics of the organisms, such as morphology and molecular sequences, many different phylogenies can be created from the analysis of the data (Reiger et al., 2004; Sasaki et al., 2013). The debate to find the most plausible phylogeny will continue to go on, because different accurate phylogenies can be created depending on the focus of the researcher (Reiger et al., 2004; Sasaki et al., 2013).

More about Relationship Between Class and Order Within Two Taxonomic Groups

Open Document