R V Ewanchuck Case Study

1964 Words4 Pages

Since the second wave of feminism in the 1960’s women have demanded for equality rights. The R V. Ewanchuck case created many disagreement’s with feminists on the topic of rape myths. It has not only been seen as a precedent for the criminal law but as well an eye opener for the society to create awareness for this act. Since society continues to support most rape myths, it overlooks the act itself and puts the blame and responsibility on the victim as opposed to the perpetrator. This has created a rape culture within society. The term rape culture was created to demonstrate the ways in which victims were blamed for sexual assault, and how male sexual violence was normalized. Feminists are exploring the world of rape myths in Canadian law …show more content…

v. Ewanchuck case occurred on June 2, 1994 and was about a seventeen year old woman being sexually assaulted when she was being interviewed for a job. While waking in a shopping mall parking lot, a young female and her were friend were approached from a man who needed some workers to help with his wood-working business. After the lady agreeing, Ewanchuck brought the lady into his van in which she was sexually assaulted several times. Ewanchuck did not take no for an answer, and kept proceeding after she kept saying no. Ewanchuck 's defence to this was that it was implied consent in which was he was acquitted by John Mcclung who was his lawyer. This case started a heated discussion with John McClung and Claire L 'Heureux- Dube, who were the lawyers presented in the case. John Mcclung brought a negative attitude towards the case, attacking the victim’s character. McClung stated "Ewanchuck’s behavior was less criminal than hormonal" (R. V Ewanchuck 214). The Supreme Court of Canada later reversed the decision of acquitting the case and made a conviction stating that “no means no”. With implied consent being the main theme in this case, it brought up precedent for future cases. This case was seen as a basis for how rape myths are discovered and how stereotyping falls into play when it comes to the Canadian law. In result of the Ewanchuck case there have been series of rape myths introduced. The main rape myth used is the same one that was used in the …show more content…

Women of color are treated differently; law does not function as a social mediator between relationships of all people. The focus is on women of colour and how non-white communities are considered inherently violent. By such stereotypes, rape myths create a belief that certain races are more dangerous than others, creating fear based on the social construction of society. Using the ``Slut Walk`` article as an example: women have argued ``it is different for a white middle class women to wear something slutty and march in a parade than a women of colour.`` Due to the social construction black woman are more likely to have their characters stereotype and are seen more promiscuous compared to white woman. (Julie Dowsett Lecture).Stereotyping has even gone so far where a police official made a comment about York university students, referring to the females saying “they should not dress like a slut” to reduce assault (Slutwalk 249). Such rape myths put women on the line, claiming that it is their fault for getting sexually assaulted because they provoke men. “Such stereotypical assumptions find their roots in many cultures, including our own. They no longer, however, find a place in Canadian law” (R. v. Ewanchuck

Open Document