Passivity over Rebellion

884 Words2 Pages

Passivity over Rebellion

The Irish Famine is a controversial debate, addressing the response to the English government’s malfeasance. The debate concerns whether the English government should be held liable for the hunger and sorrows of Irishmen. Liam O’Flaherty contributes to this debate through his novel Famine; in it he defines who is to blame for the hunger of the 1840’s. Through his depiction, he suggests that the best response to ease the problem of the famine is by rebelling against the English government. In the novel, there are characters that choose to live in a passive matter and fail at attaining prosperity, while those who rebel get it. O’Flaherty presents three Kilmartin generations, in which we witness differences in character traits and beliefs. For instance Martin Kilmartin, second generation, takes on the role of a rebel and chooses to defy Black Valley’s tycoon, Chadwick. Siding with a solution of aggression to meet justice, O’Flaherty identifies survivors as rebellions, and victims of the famine as pacifists. Furthermore, in his novel, O’Flaherty suggests that the best response to the Irish Famine is through aggression.

In addition, Martin’s drastic change in character is O’Flaherty’s strategy of revealing a cause and effect situation. For example, in the beginning of the novel, Martin was characterized as a coward for not having the courage to contradict his father’s customs. To being admired by the residents of Black Valley, for his courageous act of defying Chadwick. O’Flaherty portrays Martin as a representative of Irishmen. He portrays Martin as passive but with the potential to rebellious in order to meet justice. Through Martin, O’Flaherty is trying to set across a point: it is never late to fight for ...

... middle of paper ...

...hough the food was becoming scarce and she had no news about her husband. While the older generation of Killmartins took a pessimists response to the famine, they chose to remain passive and did not have a motivation to strive for survival. Although Mary was slowly being drained by the hunger, she managed to stay positive, waiting for the return of her husband. On the other hand, Martin’s father, Bryan Kilmartin is against the idea of migrating to America and leaving his provenance. Bryan Kilmartin lives through the famine in a sense of denial, believing that the blight will soon go away, he says, “God doesn’t send hunger for long. He sends it to remind us of our sins…” (O’Flaherty 295) Due to his patriotism, Bryan refuses to migrate from his country and strive for survival; he would rather die of starvation than betray his country and leave it during its hardships.

More about Passivity over Rebellion

Open Document