Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between economic growth and environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Norway, a northern European country roughly the size of Montana, has become somewhat of an anomaly in the world of modern day economics. With a little over 5 million people, Norway boasts some staggering statistics; consistently ranking within the top ten countries in the world when it comes to GDP per capita, healthcare, education, freedom of press, and corruption transparency, it is no wonder the small Northern European nation ranks second in the UN’s ‘World Happiness Report’ .
This was not always the case, however. A relatively modest nation only 100 years ago, Norway’s economic boom has not only been remarkable, but has given rise to an entirely new mode of economic thought. Termed the “Third Way” and the “Nordic Model”, Norway created an original economic system that broke the boundaries of the two former traditional schools of thought, capitalism and communism. This groundbreaking and innovative model not only revealed an alternative to the two aforementioned opposing ideologies, Norway’s implementation of the Third Way surpassed the world’s expectations both economically and socially.
By examining the history of Norway’s economy, this paper will attempt to shed light on the origins of the Third Way and what the implications of instilling such an experimental Nordic Model on the small European nation have been. Investigating aspects such as geography, natural resources, government, society, and the institutions within, will elucidate exactly why Norway, and Scandinavia as a whole, has been so successful in creating a unique system admired across the globe.
Historically Norway has a rich past, but had never truly been a self-governing entity until gaining independence from Sweden in 1905. Prior to independence, Norway was...
... middle of paper ...
...eated an innovative and unique hybrid model utilizing the top facets of each philosophy. With a Nordic twist, each Scandinavian nation placed a huge emphasis on human rights and progressive social issues.
The Third Way and Nordic Model have broken the ideological and close-minded shibboleths of both communism and capitalism by setting an example for the world to admire. Encouraging a fairly free market with some government regulations, a mixed economy created a strong Scandinavia that has been able to withstand the ups and downs of capitalism. Strong, reliable, and efficient institutions must be in control of this system, and when they are, the model can work impressively well.
The proof is in the statistics, and consistently ranking highest in the world on a plethora of social and economic issues, Scandinavia has proven to the world there is indeed a, “Third Way
He affirms that the twentieth century ideas of socialism and that it cannot work because of history’s “proof” that people are selfish and governments abuse power. However, he declares that notion “is too simple.” Furthermore, he questions if common sense is from the “utopian dreams of the past,” then why can Lincoln, Roosevelt, or Johnson’s ideas be reevaluated for the present day. In fact, he affirms that the idea that markets safeguard the democracy and freedom that the citizens of the United States hold so dearly is more utopian than those aforementioned. Concluding, he reiterates that by ignoring “socialist” ideas, the established government is doing a great “disservice” to the United States.
Diamond, Jared (2005). Norse Greenland’s End. Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed (pp.258-286). New York: Penguine Group.
In Norway capitalism has been combined with socialism.
Grofman, B. Lijphart, A. & Lijphart, A. 2002. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'S The evolution of electoral and party systems in the Nordic countries. USA: Agathon Press, Inc. Heywood, A. 2002.
Det Konservative Folkeparti (The Conservative People’s Party), supported by Dansk Folkeparti (The Danish People’s Party).
With the introduction of the consumer revolution and new technologies that increased the production and variety of goods, it seemed like living standards were getting better. However, with the Revolutions of 1848, it is once again uncertain if people felt comfortable with the current political, economic, and social situations of countries in Europe. Nevertheless, people had tried to solve these problems in many different ways and methods. However, there was a clear distinction between the type of people who tried to solve the problems of Europe. There were those who thought that Europe was already in a fine position and didn’t need extreme reforms, which were moderates, and those who suggested more radical measures to be taken to achieve better, which were the
Throughout history the world has experienced several types of socio-economies, from Mussolini’s fascism to Mao’s communism. All of those economies have its weaknesses and strengths and most have countries that can validate its effectiveness. However, to decide which economy is truly better for society, there has to be criteria on which to judge the economy’s effectiveness. So what is a society? In essence, it is a network of bonds we as human beings forged under the assumption, that working together we can all be happier than if we were only looking out for ourselves. With society, everyone is able to concentrate on what they do best, reap the benefits from the skills of others, and avoid the conflict that would arise otherwise. Thus, it follows that the ultimate goal of society is the happiness of everyone. And currently, there is only one economy that has staved off the test of time and reached that goal. Capitalism, with its merit system, flexible cost adjustments, and by having no other economic contenders is able to achieve a better society than any other socio-economic system can.
Sweden, a fairly small country, located in Northwestern Europe on the Scandinavian Peninsula, shares its borders with Norway on the right, and Finland on the left. The northern region of Sweden is within the artic circle whereas the south is more temperate with heavily cultivated fertile land. It is known for its cold winters and large forests. It is ranked 83rd in the world population with over 8.9 million people. It is a highly urbanized country with an 84.7 % urban population distribution (84.7 % of the people live in urban areas, cities, towns, etc.). The capitol of Sweden is Stockholm. Sweden is a homogeneous country with a small Sami minority (approximately 15,000 nomadic reindeer herding Lapps located in the north). Twelve percent of their population consists of immigrants form other European nations. The official language spoken is Swedish (with the Sami and Finnish populations retaining their own languages), although English is widely and fluently spoken in the cities. The dominant religion is Evangelical Lutheranism (94 %), but also includes those who practice Roman Catholicism (1.5 %) and Pentecostal (1 %), with the remaining 3.5 % practicing various religions.
The greatest benefit comes from how a political economy analyses power, influence, and political ideology to shape public policy-making. (Bryant 2015, Coburn 2010, and Raphael 2010,2015) agree that, social democratic welfare states (e.g., Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) have the most ideal political economy, as they are least stratified and enjoy more government funded social aid programs, hence, less prevalence of social inequality. Therefore, the recipe for achieving a society with low social inequality and improved conditions for SODH; involves a change in the political economy, which requires governments addressing social and or public policies. In providing more social for its people, will in turn improve health outcomes and result in
This essay discusses the influx of Norwegian immigrants as well as their role is skiing logging boating and fishing. This resource is based on the archives in the Nordic Heritage Museum. The weakness with this resource is that it is just a short easy although it strength is it covers many aspects of how Norwegians helped develop Seattle.
During the seventh and eighth centuries, the Swedes were merchant seamen well known for their trade. In the ninth century, Nordic Vikings raided and ravaged the European Continent as far as the Black and Caspian Seas. During the 11th and 12th centuries, Sweden slowly became a united Christian kingdom that later included Finland. Queen Margaret of Denmark united all the Nordic lands in the "Kalmar Union" in 1397. Frequent tension within the countries and within the union gradually led to open conflict between the Swedes and the Danes in the 15th century. The union's final disintegration in the early 16th century resulted in a long-lived rivalry between Norway and Denmark on one side and Sweden and Finland on the other.
Such as the idea that the system is concerned with preserving status differential like workers and housewives which can lead to benefits that vary. A third welfare system is the Social Democrat or Scandinavian type. The Scandinavian type exists in Northern Europe and provides generous benefits to all citizens. A distinguishing feature of the Scandinavian type is the idea of Universalism and the emphasis on social equality. The system’s policies exist throughout one’s life or “cradle to grave.” A forth welfare system is the Southern European type which is similar to the Corporatist Continental type, but has less size and scope. Finally, there is the Communist East European welfare state which follows the Soviet Union’s model for social security (Kaelble 265). Overall, Europe has five unique types of welfare states. Each system has a different idea on how government should operate and how much government should intervene to help its citizens. The differences in the development of welfare states in Europe, particularly during the Cold War period, have led to deep divisions in Europe. Countries hold a different set of values and principles that must be respected in order to form a strong
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.
The world’s economies continue to be divided on by whom their means of production benefit, supply, enrich, and protect. Many debates and altercations have been a result of disagreements between capitalists and socialists. Socialists believe the government is essential in providing equality for all and the allocation of capital goods. But the strength of capitalism can be attributed to an incentive structure based upon the three P’s: (1) prices determined by market forces, (2) a profit-and-loss system of accounting and (3) private property rights. The failure of socialism can be traced to its neglect of these three incentive-enhancing components. (Perry) Socialism gives power to the government to regulate the goods produced, the amount of goods produced, where the goods are distributed, and the price of the goods. This command system does not allow for the creativity, wealth, and freedom that capitalism supplies the citizens. Capitalism provides a market system that permits companies to regulate the economies themselves. Capitalism offers the world’s economy the freedom to manage itself, diversify, prosper, fail, and freedom from regulation in order to supply the world based on demand and creativity. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer, and the factory worker. (Thomson) Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. Within it, the means of production and distribution are owned by individuals: private ownership and free enterprise are believed to lead to more efficiency, lower prices, be...
Shawki, Ahmed, Paul D’Amato (2000), “Briefing: The Shape of World Capitalism,” International Socialist Review, [http://www.isreview.org/issues/11/world_capitalism.shtml], accessed 19 May 2012.