My Evaluation of Zach Chernitzer

642 Words2 Pages

I evaluated Zach Chernitzer. He did his research speech on the history of the Red Hot Chili Peppers guitarists. The subject was very interesting and the speaker had a lot to talk about. Throughout the speech the speaker had many strength, he also had points that could stand for improvement. The speaker knew what he was talking about during his speech. He was very informative and passionate about what he was talking about. The content was well organized for the most part. He have a nice timeline of over the years with the different albums that have come out. The speaker could have had a better introduction and conclusion. He also could have done better with stating his in-text citations during the speech. There was a lot of content he went over so it was hard to pay attention the whole time. His slides were very nicely done. They were very interesting and went along with what he was talking about very well each time he transitioned. I also, enjoyed that every time he was talking about a certain guitarist there was a picture to go along with the information about the person. His choice of words went well with the content of the speech short and sweet. The delivery of the speech was almost inspiring. The conversational quality was definitely there. You could tell the speaker enjoyed this band and loved to talk about them. He had very good vocalization throughout the speech and great eye contact. He had excellent pronunciation of words, very clear. Overall, the speaker did a wonderful job at delivering his speech. The speaker had many strengths. One that I noticed that others might not was his attire. The speaker wore an outfit that I imagined someone in a band would wear. Button up, t short underneath, some s... ... middle of paper ... ... qualities over the bad. I do have some recommendations for the speaker to work on his weaknesses. Number one, he should get a classmate to videotape him during a speech so he can see and hear his flaws. Number two, he should practice in front of many different people as well as in front of the mirror before giving the speech in front of the class. Number three, he should get a buzzer and every time he makes a vocalized pause whoever he is giving the speech to should buzz it. Number four, he should make the speech more audience oriented play a game or a clip from the topic so that it’s not information overload. I hope the speaker takes some of these tips and applies them to his next speech. In conclusion, Zach did a great job! He had some flaws and issues during his presentation. However, the strengths were bountiful and made the speech interesting and fun!

Open Document