What Is The Ethical Character In The Case Of Professor Corvus

First, in this film Professor Corvus was the most unethical character as he is responsible for the 5 murders of those attorneys and also the murder of Detective Dubose. He told deviant lies and acted as others to entrap Lawson into publishing a book that had details of the 5 murders he committed, (Pollock 2014). He also seemed to be an egoism type of person, because while entrapping Lawson he could only be thinking of himself and getting his stories out, (Pollock, 2014). He was an all-out unethical person in this film, because throughout the whole film he was trying to frame Lawson for the murders in the book to the murder of Detective Dubose.
Next, Thurman Parks III was the next most unethical because of the rape and murder that he committed, and him running his mouth about it like he was untouchable. It seemed as if Thurman felt that his wealth put him above the law. In this case he deliberately broke the law and even mentioned how he told her he would walk, in which this showed that he did not have the basic morals and values that people usually have, (Pollock. 2014). It was as if he was giving a number of gratuities to those that were helping him to get off of the charges against him, (Pollock, 2014). He come from a rich family so no matter what he did he felt as if they could just pay everyone off to ensure that he

While he was at Lawson’s home he let his officers turn Lawson’s home into an uproar destroying his belongings. Other than that he seemed to be a pretty good guy and wanted to do his duties to uphold the law, (Pollock, 2014). He seen both side of the story, and once he seen who was in the wrong he came to save Russell from being killed by Professor Corvus. This showed that Detective Dubose actions for doing so were pretty superogatories, because he could have just left Lawson out to die, (Pollock,