Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is money an effective motivator
Organizational behavior motivation theory
Herzberg motivators
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is money an effective motivator
The origin for concepts regarding motivational factors, as applied in the organization, stem from the [psychological] behavioral study of human needs. The relevance of the former is fundamental to the three issues posed this week because it correlates the assumptions of both Maslow and Herzberg. The aforementioned assumptions stress the importance of consideration of human needs in relation to motivational factors in the workplace, including job satisfaction, and superior performance. Furthermore, this concept has inexorably expanded to include both Maslow’s and Herzberg’s theories as a harmonious and reciprocally complementary unit; applicable to almost any organization. That being said, this analysis will include 1) a description of Maslow’s need’s hierarchy, 2) an interpretation of the intent of the former and its pertinence to leadership, and 3) an explanation of why money is not a motivator, based on Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Maslow’s theory surrounds a hierarchy of needs; basic physiological needs residing on the lowest rung and self-actualizing needs being the pinnacle of the order. This hierarchy is composed of needs arranged by importance and consists of the following: Physiological- hunger, thirst, shelter; Security-safety from threat or harm; Love- belongingness, social love and friendship; Esteem- respect from others and for oneself; and Self-actualization- fulfillment through the realization of one’s personal goals and potential (Maslow, 1943) (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2009). Maslow segregates the lower order needs and classifies them as “basic needs”- these are limited to all but self-actualization (Maslow, 1943). Further, Maslow proposes that basic needs must first be met (or partially met) ... ... middle of paper ... ...enge to others- dare I say a motivator- to keep searching for improvement and innovation in organizational motivation theory. Works Cited Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill. Lahiff, J. M. (1976). Motivators, Hygiene Factors, and Empathic Communication. The Journal of Business Communication 13:3 , 15-23. Leidecker, J. K., & Hall, J. J. (1984). Motivation: Good Theory- Poor Application. Training and Development Journal. June. , 3-7. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50 , 370-396. Soliman, H. M. (1970). Motivation-Hygiene Theory of Job Attitudes: an Empirical Investigation and an Attempt to Reconcile Both the One- and the Two-Factor Theories of Job Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, V.54, no. 5 , 452-461.
Maslow believed that there was a hierarchy of five innate needs that influence people’s behaviors (Schultz & Schultz, 2013, p.246-247). In a pyramid fashion, at the base are physiological needs, followed by safety needs, then belonginess and love needs, succeeded by esteem needs, and finally the need for self-actualization. Maslow claimed that lower order needs must be at least partially satisfied before higher level needs are addressed. Furthermore, behavior is dominated by solely one need
Psychologist Abraham Maslow created the hierarchy of needs, outlining and suggesting what a person need to reach self-actualization and reveal the true potential of themselves. In the model, Maslow propose that a person has to meet basic needs in order to reach the true potential of themselves. Biological/physiological needs, safety needs, love/belonging need, esteem needs according to Maslow is the fundamental frame for reaching the peak of self. The last need to be met on the scale
As with any theory, the motivator-hygiene theory has its share of criticisms. Among them is the lack of consideration for individual differences. Herzberg’s theory only takes into account internal organizational factors and does not consider personal attitudes and beliefs of one’s work. Moreover, the two-factor theory assumes that high job satisfaction equates to performance at work. This, however, does not hold true in many situations.(insert example) A highly satisfied, content, and happy worker is not necessarily the hardest worker in an organization.
Steers, T. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29 (3), 379-387.
Latham G.P and Pinder C.C. (2005). Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology 56.
Unlike many of his colleagues at the time who were focusing on psychopathology, or what is wrong with individuals, he focused on how individuals are motivated to fulfill their potential and what needs govern their respective behaviors (McLeod)). Maslow developed the hierarchy over time, adjusting from a rigid structure where needs must be met before being able to achieve a higher level, to where the individuals can experience and behave in ways across the hierarchy multiple times daily depending on their needs. The hierarchy is comprised of 5 levels; Physiological, Safety and Security, Love and Belonging, Esteem, and Self-Actualization. The bottom two levels are considered basic needs, or deficiency needs because once the needs are met they cease to be a driving factor, unlike psychological needs. Loving and Belonging and Esteem needs are considered psychological needs, and are different from basic needs because they don’t stem from a lack of something, but rather the desire to grow. Maslow theorizes that individual’s decisions and behavior are determined based on their current level of needs, and the ideal level to achieve full potential culminates in self-actualization; however, operating on this level cannot be achieved until the preceding levels of needs have been
Steers, Richard M., Richard T. Mowday, and Debra L. Shapiro. "Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory." The Academy of Management Review 29.3 (2004): 379. Print.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Below I would like to discuss some of the motivational approaches that have been
There is no shortage of motivational theories, just as there is none for leadership theories; however there are a few particularly important ones. It is interesting to note that even some of the most notable ideas of motivation are nothing more than untested hypotheses with simple anecdotal observations as a backbone that has served for years of...
Latham, G. P. (2007). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Of the numerous speculations of work motivation, Herzberg's (1998) motivator hygiene theory has been a standout amongst the most persuasive in late decades. Essentially, the hypothesis isolates propelling variables into two classifications: Motivator factors, which have a remark with the work itself, and Hygiene factors, which have a remark with the encompassing
Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation.
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.
Maccoby, M. (2010). The 4 Rs of Motivation. Research Technology Management, 53(4), 60-61. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/726801562?accountid=27313