The very moment of Gawain's introduction, the reader begins to sum up his virtues. From his own mouth Gawain explains why he should accept the Green Knight's challenge in place of the king:
I am the weakest, the most wanting in wisdom, I know,
And my life, if lost, would be least missed, truly.
Only through your being my uncle, am I to be valued;
No bounty but your blood in my body do I know. (Sir Gawain 34)
Gawain bases his arguments in comparison between his traits and those of the other knights. These arguments, although self-depraving, paradoxically increase the reader's estimation of him. His humility is striking, and the fact that he agrees to the challenge while the others - whom Gawain previously described as “No braver knights when battle is joined” (Sir Gawain 34) - did not, casts doubt on the validity of him being the supposed worst among them.
The author gives the reader no indication that anyone in the court attempts to refute Gawain's bleak assertion saying only;
Then wisely they whispered of it,
And after, all said the same:
That the crowned King should be quit,
And Gawain given the game. (Sir Gawain 34)
This suggests that the common opi...
... middle of paper ...
...y. When he returns donning the lady's green sash as a reminder of his sin, the poet juxtaposes Gawain's shame of this token “The burden [he] bear[s] for being caught by cowardice and covetousness” (Sir Gawain 114) with the court's reaction:
And all the lords and ladies belonging to the Table
Laughed at it loudly, and concluded amiably
That each brave man of the brotherhood should bear a baldric
A band, obliquely about him, of bright green,
Of the same hue as Sir Gawain's and for his sake wear it.
So it ranked as renown to the Round Table,
And an everlasting honour to him who had it, (Sir Gawain 114-115)
This comparison truly shows that Gawain has escaped the moral mediocrity and obsession with image that seems to permeate King Arthur's Court. He no longer measures his virtue on the scale of others and hence, has reached moral fulfillment.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Morals: The belief in a moral obligation to engage in international, like the persuasion theory, is quite broad. Morality can’t be reduced to a matter of right and wrong; states have more complex beliefs than that. In this case, the causal factor for participation is rooted in belief. This differs from coercion in that coercion disregards the intentions of (the weaker) states. The weaker states do what they must not what they desire. The morality theory also differs from the persuasion theory. Under the persuasion theory the state is in control of its actions and acts based on ideas and principles, however, those principles are based on self-interest.... [tags: Law, Morality, Human rights, Ethics]
1089 words (3.1 pages)
- Sigmund Freud believed that society has instilled morality upon us, exterminating our individualism. This morality eventually leads to neurosis, in which it becomes more difficult for us to maintain ourselves through the stress of society’s morality. I disagree with Freud, because I believe that morality isn’t forced on us externally, but internally through reason. As humans developed reason, we also developed a sense of morality through that reason. Freud believes that humans should do what they want because we shouldn’t restrict ourselves on society 's behalf.... [tags: Human, Religion, Morality, Thought]
1499 words (4.3 pages)
- When it comes to morality, there are different theories that can lead to what drives and creates morality. Yet, the question that all theorists try to find the correct answer to is what morality is. The theories that were discussed in chapter 2 gave off the impression that each theory that has ever existed and will exist will be contradicted. Although each theory gave a precise explanation, each theory was based on every theorists own opinion and belief. For every act or motive there is a reason, and any action that would take place would be deemed as unethical.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue, Immanuel Kant]
869 words (2.5 pages)
- Many arguments have been made over whether or not religion and morality are interconnected. It is quite difficult to find a well rounded definition of religion or morality due to everyone having different perceptions of both of the words. The word religion comes from the Latin words Religio or Religare both have similar meanings, a bond/bind (Diener, 1997). Merriam-Webster dictionary defines religion as "a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith (Religion).” Morality comes from the Latin word mores meaning character or manner (Diener, 1997).... [tags: Religion, Morality, Human, Ethics]
1374 words (3.9 pages)
- In today’s society it’s very common to hear people debate about whether someone’s action was “moral” or not. The concept of morality is discussed like there’s a set definition of it, when the reality is far from it. There are so many definitions for morality that it makes the word itself unclear. To have a better understanding of morality it 's best to look at the word’s root word: moral. Having morals is defined as having good character and how that person interacts with others. Having morals is to have morality.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Human]
864 words (2.5 pages)
- Chapter 1: Morality is not a science; it is an ever-changing view of what is right and wrong, good from bad throughout the course of human life. Science deals with facts, measures of values, where there are only “personal” opinions. Morality is subjective, where I don’t believe that there is such thing as moral facts. People disagree/ agree over ethical questions all the time, it is subjective matter. In a subjective matter, the speaker conveys feelings, where as in a scientific matter, the speaker would report facts (tested/proven).... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Moral psychology]
2354 words (6.7 pages)
- Question: Is there a role for morality in the law. If so, what is this role. In society a code of morality could be seen as a set of beliefs, values and principles. The root of morality is bad and good behaviour. Moral views differ between individuals also within society. A dictionary definition of morality is ‘a set of personal or social standards for good or bad behaviour and character.’ Furthermore, law could be seen as a set of rules assigned by the government to keep society in order by following these rules.... [tags: Morality, Law, Human rights, Moral]
1660 words (4.7 pages)
- Morality is an abstract concept that continues to confuse people worldwide, a concept that is accompanied by the image of a compass. However, people believe that morality is a generalized system, but then how are morals symbolized by a compass if most compasses are different. The answer is obvious in M. L. Stedman 's The Light Between Oceans where the author communicates that morality is not defined in black and white terms, but is rather a blurred shade of grey. Stedman gives readers this answer through the actions and reactions of Tom and Isabel, Hannah, and Lucy on the decision made to keep Lucy on Janus Rock.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Mother, American films]
1335 words (3.8 pages)
- Machiavelli believed that, ethics and morality were considered in other categories than those generally known. He does not deny the existence of, but did not see how they can be useful in its traditional sense as in politics and in the government of the people. According to Machiavelli, a man is by nature a political angry and fearful. Machiavelli had no high opinion of the people. It is assumed that a person is forced to be good and can get into the number of positive features, such as prudence and courage.... [tags: Political philosophy, Morality, Ethics, Government]
1447 words (4.1 pages)
- What is the morality of a lie. Morality and ethics is a topic widely discussed in philosophy. There is a distinctive difference in the perspectives of ethics held by Kantians and those who hold a utilitarian view of ethics. Kantians believe that the ethical standpoint of a decision be made purely on the decision itself, whereas Utilitarian’s judge the ethics of the situation based on the outcome. Kant believes that “good will has nothing to do with the outcome” (Garner PowerPoint). In the case of comparing these two views a simple example will be used: a lie to save a life.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, Logic]
1074 words (3.1 pages)