Methods of Persuasion Used by Presidents Barack Obama and George W Busch

734 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Power of persuasion president

Throughout history leaders of nations worldwide have utilized different methods of persuasion to try and influence peoples’ thinking or justify their actions. The way a leader addresses a nation is crucial in times of war, hardship, or traumatic events and this may play a role on the outlook of the people. The terrorist attacks that took place on September 11, 2001 prompted two U.S. Presidents, George Bush and Barack Obama, to take steps that were meant to protect the American people and U.S allies. Both Presidents waged war, which so far has spanned three presidential terms, on people who were thought to be terrorists and many lives were lost. The purpose of this blog is to examine the methods of persuasion used by both Presidents in their effort to justify their actions and the ongoing need for U.S troops in the Middle East.
In May 2003, President George W. Bush addressed the nation and announced an end to major combat operations in Iraq which resulted in the death of Saddam Hussein. His message touched on many issues in the ongoing war on terrorism but most importantly, it conveyed the fact that the United States would not tolerate the killing of innocent people. The President began by expressing gratitude to the men and women who have sacrificed for their country. He then proceeded to inform the American people of the work that had been accomplished in Iraq, Afghanistan, and neighboring countries since the declaration of war, all while substantiating the need for ongoing military presence in the Middle East. In addition to informing the nation, he attempted to ensure the safety of the American people and warn those with intentions to harm Americans or their allies.
On May 1, 2011, President Barack Obama informe...

... middle of paper ...

...”. He further claims that bin Laden’s death was a great achievement and “we’ve disrupted terrorists’ attacks and strengthened our homeland”, but “his death is not the end of our effort”. In order to justify the need for military troops to remain in Afghanistan, he stated that “we must remain vigilant at home and abroad”.
The events that took place on September 11, 2001 resulted in many lives lost and the “War on Terror” continues to claim lives daily. Both President Obama and President Obama presented informative and persuasive claims in their efforts to justify their actions and the ongoing need for U.S. troops in the Middle East. By examining and identifying the methods of persuasion that many leaders use, people are better equipped to make informative decisions on the election of future leaders.

Works Cited

Youtube. Obama speech
Youtube Bush Speech

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Senator Robert Byrd's Speech Arrogance Of Power

    252 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Speech “Arrogance of Power: Today, I Weep for my Country...” by Senator Robert Byrd is more persuasive. He tries to persuade members of the Senate that the United States was arriving into a imprudent and unnecessary war. His thesis states “Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned.” Byrd pleas to both the Senate and the American people in order to positively dispute his argument; this becomes obvious in his use of the cooperative expression in paragraph two. The main argument used is that Byrd impulses the people, the politicians, and citizens of the United States leave the conceited purposes of the War on Terror and concentrate on peaceful diplomacy. In paragraph 11, he writes, "Why

    Read More

  • Presidential Powers: A Comparsion of Predencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    ”(Neustadt, pg.11) Persuasion and bargaining are techniques that presidents can use to influence policy. Neustadt explains how persuasion can help a president get laws passed and to get favorable public opinion. Neustadt explains that bargaining is important in order to influence other politicians in Congress and inside of the executive branch. He stated that "The essence of a President's persuasive task is to convince such men that what the White House wants of them is what they ought to do for their sake and on their authority" (Neustadt, pg.30). Neustadt believes that a president should use persuasion rather than commanding because it is more effective.

    Read More

  • Rudy Giuliani's Role In The Aftermath

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    And to this day, these values hold up and serve as the basis for all aspects of our country, whether it range from politics to social issues. But on September 11, 2001, these fundamental principles that stand for freedom were put into serious jeopardy by maniacal terrorists who refused to accept the progressive role that America played on a global scale. But as America slowly began to recover from this tragedy, the responsibility to lift the American spirit was left to the hands of the politicians who we ironically know to cause so much chaos and bipartisan gridlock. Nonetheless, world leaders such as Rudy Giuliani eased the pain for the American populous in a manner that called for reform in order to prevent an attack like this from ever occurring on American soil. Ultimately, in his address to the United Nations General Assembly following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Rudy Giuliani makes effective use of tone, rhetorical devices, and logical and emotional appeals to soothe the wounds that the

    Read More

  • Analysis of Persuasive Symbols in Ronald Reagan's The Space Shuttle "Challenger" Tragedy Address

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Politicians frequently receive negative publicity at the hand of their own use of language. Their uses of words as they relate to persuasion typically fall within one of the three dimensions of language functions, semantic or thematic. Often their persuasive language can be found to closely resemble any of these three categories simultaneously. There are many tools for analyzing persuasive symbols, many of which should be utilized when analyzing great communicators such as President Ronald Reagan. In response to the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion on January 28th, 1986 where seven brave American’s gave their lives. President Ronald Reagan made history with his famous speech, which didn’t only serve to address the great tragedy, but served as a focal point of comfort for the grieving nation. He commemorated the seven heroes who had fallen that morning in route to outer space; he expressed gratitude to NASA for their past developments and encouraged further explorations. Ronald Reagan was a great communicator, a charismatic persuader whose words delivered focus of the message through utilization of persuasive symbols. This paper aims not to be an all-inclusive guide for analyzing persuasive symbols, but will sufficiently guide the reader to be a more perceptive of persuasive language.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Unresisted Persuasion

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    Summary – It is quite difficult to avoid any persuasive acts while resisting them at the same time. Being prepared with knowledge of how easy it is to be manipulated, controlled, seduced, etc. allows us to open up to the use of rhetoric.

    Read More

  • Comparing John F. Kennedy's Inauguration Speech, And Antony

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Since the beginning of mankind, humans always use their skills of persuasion in order to prove a point to an audience. John F. Kennedy and William Shakespeare, though it is a 362 year difference, wrote and announced work displaying persuasion values. John F. Kennedy, in his Inauguration Speech, and Antony, a character in the William Shakespeare play Julius Caesar, uses the tools of language and persuasion in order to deliver the audience their intended reasoning. In both of the speeches, some of the tools that make these speeches effective is the tone, the rhetorical devices, and persuasive appeals.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of President’s Address To The Nation Post 9/11

    1656 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rhetorical analysis assignment: President’s Address to the Nation. Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling on all citizens and all nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the Middle East struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of George Bush 9/11 Speech

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This

    Read More

  • Presidents' Power to Persuade

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    the US to sign a new treaty, the senate would have to ratify it with a

    Read More

  • The Counter-Insurgency Strategy

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    The population-centric nation building requires large numbers of American ground forces, dispersed and living in the local population in an effort to win hearts and minds away from the insurgent, and build a nation. President Obama speech is aligned with what General Petraeus’s wrote in FM 3-24 on counterinsurgency through the use of tenets. General Petraeus’s key tenets of COIN are identified as 1) focus on protecting civilians over killing the enemy 2) assume greater risk and 3) use minimum, not maximum force. The focus is on the Afghanistan people as the center of gravity. The people involvement is a key element of the hearts and minds theory and the COIN strategy. Afghani...

    Read More

  • Essay On The Bush Doctrine

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    Unilateral use of force was one point described by President Bush as a means to combat terrorism threats. His message, straightforward and stern reassured the commitment of the United States to remove these threats. The uncertainty and apprehension of additional attacks on American soil resonated for some time after 9/11, Bush made it known that America would not tolerate anyone planning to conduct terrorist acts ...

    Read More

  • Examples Of Persuasive Strategies Used In Obama's Political Speech

    5786 Words  | 12 Pages

    This paper examines the persuasive strategies of President Obama's public speech and additionally the incognito belief system of the same, cherished in his inaugural location. Our examination will be grounded in Norman Fairclough’s presumptions in critical discourse analysis (CDA), guaranteeing that "belief systems dwell in messages" that "it is impractical to 'peruse off' belief systems from writings" and that "messages are interested in assorted understandings" (Fairclough: 1995).The chosen corpus' ideological and enticing segments are evaluated, subsequently uncovering Obama's influential methods.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of President Barack Obama's Speech To The Nation On Syria

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    The night before the anniversary of 9/11 in 2013, Barack Obama delivered a speech to the United States of America on the subject of Syria’s inhumane use of chemical weapons on its own citizens. The United States’ intelligence analysts estimated that more than 1,400 civilians were killed due to the chemical warheads that were launched on the area right outside of Damascus. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation on Syria, he attempts to persuade the American people to support his plan of a targeted air strike on Syria. By describing the victims of Syria, giving reasons for the inhumanity of the Syrian government, and reinforcing his credibility,

    Read More

  • Social Psychology of Persuasion

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    In closing, Persuasion is a powerful tool, both in trying to persuade others and being

    Read More

  • The Iraq War Of Iraq

    1565 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict that began with the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a US-led coalition. The US wanted to destroy Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring democracy. To addition to that, US and its allies believed that Iraq had secret stocks of chemical and nuclear weapons, hence Iraq was a threat to the world (Axford 2010). In March 2003, US air bombed Baghdad and Saddam escaped Iraq. The invasion disarmed the government of Saddam Hussein. President Bush in March 2003 gave a premature speech, that tyrant of Iraq has fallen and US has freed its people. President Bush flew into Iraq to show the world that the war is over, even though nothing was accomplished (Kirk et al. 2014). Iraq was facing 13 years of scantions, therefore regime diverted its resources to flexible networks of patronage that kept it in power (Dodge 2007, 88). Iraq faced widespread of lawlessness and after the violent regime changed US could not control the situation. Iraqi civilians were looting, attacking ministries building and this resulted into a series of event (Kirk et al. 2014) . From a military perspective the regime was taken down, but they made no commitment to rebuild or secure the country.

    Read More

More about Methods of Persuasion Used by Presidents Barack Obama and George W Busch

Open Document