Child Pennography: The Influence Of Child Ponography

1558 Words4 Pages

The 21st century is in a constant battle of media representation of the body and its continuous depictions of it in provocative and sexualized styles blasted at young adults and child audiences. Thus, these kids are all rapidly exposed to sex and images of what is considered ‘sexy’, which quickly becomes the perceived norm for all of them. As a result, our civilization struggles to formulate controls and laws on these forms of media that, especially when it comes in tandem with the variety technological developments, as newer and better forms of them are pumped out every second.
It becomes even more difficult to form boundaries around things like sex or the sexualization in this era, where sex is seen everywhere by young audiences. As such …show more content…

Thusly, as a result “punishment for the possession of child pomography now equals or exceeds the penalties for many other serious crimes” (Hessick 1439) but they do not address the gray areas outside of the typical spectrum of child pornography. This point specifically being, the aforementioned sexting culture among teens which leads to arrests and prosecuted for sending sexual images of themselves or receiving them from others their age. This has developed into a highly contested issue that many believe should be handled by the family of the involved parties or even schools rather than law enforcement as the “child ponography penalties are disproportionate to the wrongdoing of sexting, and that minors cannot appreciate the consequences of their actions” (Hessick 1439). Which is an understandable for this exact reasoning is also behind having an age of consent, for these same legislators believe children under that age cannot understand what they are consenting to. So teens are being prosecuted for crimes they do not understand about a subject they cannot consent to, even if they are at the age of …show more content…

By setting forth a national definition for what constitutes child pornography and how to address it would allow states to properly handle cases such as the commonly seen, sexting done by teens. There has currently only been only definition of child pornography provided by the Supreme Court which was given in the first child pornography trial in which they stated child pornography is defined by causes two major harms, “the harm of creation and the harm of circulation” (Hessick 1444). This unclear definition leaves a bunch of confusion throughout and requires delicate handling as a direct result. People cannot understand their rights nor can the law address such crimes if there is no way to define what constitutes

Open Document