Essay PreviewMore ↓
We will like to start with some facts to show the importance the importance of managing cultures in the organisation and how lack managing changes could haunt back the companies in terms of mergers and acqusions.
The challenges to merge, and so change two organizations is so huge and it always requires a lot of resources and the right people. According to Business journal ’The successful merging of cultures is difficult, traumatic, and crucial. Individuals and companies with different histories, values, expectations, and beliefs are asked to adopt a unified perspective and to serve as a cohesive unit. This is made more difficult by the fact that in almost any merger situation there are perceptions of “winners” and “losers” as well as fear and uncertainty regarding the future.
The stakes involved are great. Quite simply, mergers often fail, and culture clashes are a key reason for that failure. One 10-year study of 340 major acquisitions found that total shareholder returns for 57% of the merged concerns lagged behind their industry averages three years after the merger (Lublin & O’Brian, 1997). Other studies conclude that over 60% of mergers fail in their intended purpose (Carleton, 1997).
And according to New York Times or the Wall Street Journal clearly demonstrates that success in merging cultures (that is, in preventing “culture clash”) is critical to positive merger outcomes. In fact, many management experts cite culture clashes as the primary cause of merger failures (Lublin & O’Brian, 1997). Several recent mergers have suffered from culture clashes. For example, success of the merger of Harty Press, an old-line printer, and Pre-Press Graphics, a high-tech desktop publishing concern, was jeopardized by a severe culture clash (Welles, 1994). Culture clashes following the merger of Boeing Co. and McDonnell Douglas have thrown Boeing off course, with its stock well below pre-merger levels (Bernstein, Reinhardt, & Browder, 1998). In similar fashion, the $4 billion acquisition of Santa Fe Corp. by Burlington Northern, the largest in history when it was completed, has become one of the industry’s most disappointing, in large part because of unanticipated cultural gaps. Many other culture-related merger disappointments could be cited.
Then its so clear that managing culture is so important and in this paper we will discuss why managing change is so difficult and why there is always resistance to it. We have to note that employees do not always welcome change and there are the main hindrances as shown many studies conducted over the years.
How to Cite this Page
"Managing Change in Organizations." 123HelpMe.com. 26 May 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The readings for this week touch on managing relationships with other organizations, as well as, foundations and diagnosing. In Organizations and Organizing we’re faced with the primary task facing organizations, managing their relationships with other organizations. Organizations begin by facing which tasks to do inside their boundary and what to leave to outside suppliers. This process is considered the “make-or-buy” question by transaction cost analysts and is considered essential to understanding why there are firms at all.... [tags: Management, Change management, Organization]
768 words (2.2 pages)
- For most, resistance to change inevitable, for some it is their personality and others it is fear of the unknown. Organizational structure may change through downsizing, outsourcing, acquisitions, or mergers. In this paper, I will be examining resistance to change during a merger and how to manage this type of stressful and many times unclear change in an organization. There are three key strategies for managing resistance to change; communication, participation, and empathy and support. Throughout this paper I will discuss the three strategies above as well as some other contributing factors to change in an organization.... [tags: Organizational Structure, Fear, Change]
1256 words (3.6 pages)
- Managing change is an “ongoing process whose objective is to enhance the ability of an organization to participate and respond to developments in its external and internal environments, and to enable employees at all levels to cope with the changes” (Cascio, 2016, p. 6). Change is never easy, but never impossible. It occurs when there is an understanding of the need for change, the vision of where the organization should go, and a commitment to action. Change leaders need to address the question “Why change?” and develop a rationale for the change and a compelling vision of a possible future.... [tags: Management, Strategic planning, Goal, Leadership]
877 words (2.5 pages)
- ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE We can define an “Organizational Change” after we have an idea of why it occurs: Organizational change occurs when a company evolves from the current state to some desired future state. It follows any changes in business strategies or dominant sectors of an organization which are also known as reorganization, restructuring and turnaround. Now we can define what an Organizational change is: It is the elemental strategy for ensuring that an organisation remains pertinent in a varying environment and thus is able to adapt to the changes.... [tags: Organization, Management, Change]
910 words (2.6 pages)
- If organizations are to thrive and be sustaining, they need to respond to the dynamics of their environment with change. However, change is not a singular event with an isolated focus (Spector, 2007). Effective strategic renewal is a combination of “the three faces of change”—turnaround, which targets costs; technology, which targets internal process; and behavioral, which targets employee actions and interactions (Spector, 2007). In a discussion on change management, particularly management-by-control versus management-by-shaping, Palmer, et al.... [tags: Change Management]
2972 words (8.5 pages)
- Word Count 3000 Why are there different perspectives on change within organisations INTRODUCTION Organizational Change In an ever-changing business environment, for organisations to remain competitive in this fast-moving world of technological development and globalization, organisations must examine frameworks regularly and manage change and their working practices and systems if they are to remain competitive. “It is becoming increasingly important for organizations to gain competitive advantage by being able to manage and survive change ” “Organizational change has become synonymous with managerial effectiveness since the 1980s (Burnes, 1996; Wilson, 1992).... [tags: Business Environment, Organizational Change ]
2398 words (6.9 pages)
- MANAGING CHANGE Interventions An intervention is an action or process of intervening. It is a set of sequenced and planned actions or events intended to help the organization increase its effectiveness. The purpose is to disrupt the status quo. They are deliberate attempts to change an organization or subunit toward a different and more effective state. We have identified the following as a relevant interventions used in the company, EROAD LTD. Techno-Structural Interventions These interventions focus on an organization 's technology (for example, task methods and job design) and structure (for example, division of labor and hierarchy).... [tags: Strategic management, Organization, Management]
844 words (2.4 pages)
- Overview Throughout the history of organizational literature, many scholars have suggested that change initiatives need to originate at the leadership level in order to be successful (Bennis, 1999). However history has shown that the majority of change initiatives fail, especially when mandated by top management (King & Peterson, 2007). This paper will examine why this dichotomy exists, what the role of top management should be in a change program, and how top managers can utilize key leverage points to increase their chances of a successful change implementation.... [tags: Change Management Essays]
1854 words (5.3 pages)
- This chapter focuses on changes and how to manage the change in global organization and the important of change and willingness of employee toward change. Global organization change is defined as "strategically aligned alterations in patters of employee behaviors within organization operating across national borders". To increased profit margin, the organization had to offer the more services to its customers in the form of advanced product know how. This chapter presents a three stages model that managers can use a checklist for managing a change process.... [tags: Management, ManaGeR, Organization, Change]
1270 words (3.6 pages)
- "Managing Change" Massive change is impacting on all facets of society, creating new dimensions and great uncertainty. Instant communication, super small high-tech equipments, the globalization movement, the deadly terrorist attacks in the U.S., the emerging of foreign investments in China nation are all the changing dimensions of the world. These are few of the changes which have occurred around last two decades. The issue facing people in business today is how to manage such changes.... [tags: essays research papers]
2340 words (6.7 pages)
What Causes This Resistance to Change?
Realignment of the power structure: No matter what type of change occurs, someone or some group will ultimately loose or gain “power” as a result. Until the costs/benefits are made clear, staff will anxiously await the affect the change will have on them personally.
• Fear of job loss: A common fear during a change initiative is whether positions will be come redundant
or jobs will become unnecessary.
• Fear of increased responsibility: Some staff may question whether they will have more responsibilities and/or accountabilities as a result of a change.
• Frustration with process: If staff are not consulted before, during, and after an organizational
change, they will likely be disheartened - particularly if the change has a direct impact on their jobs. If
they were consulted and their positions or suggestions were not incorporated, they will also be frustrated
– unless their managers can satisfactorily show that their input was not ignored but, rather, discussed
and shelved for logical reasons.
What Can a Manager Do?
1. Do not ignore the people side of “change management”
The practice of Change Management is a combination of the methods used by people (usually management teams) within organizations to ensure organizational transition is completed efficiently and effectively. It is extremely important that management teams consider the “people side” of any organizational change. Too often, managers look at change management as a technical process, rather than a human one. This makes sense, since the field of Change Management is described as the study of “approaches” or “processes” an organization follows when moving from its current state to a desired state. Many academic pieces discuss how
changes to structures, processes, policies, and technologies will improve efficiencies. The buzz-words used to describe this type of organizational change include: organizational reorganization, corporate restructuring, process re-engineering, resource reallocation, etc. For any of these change processes to work, however, the impact they will have on people cannot be overlooked or discounted. If these impacts are ignored, the change initiative will likely fail.
2. Hone interpersonal and communication skills
During the 1980s and 1990s, managers were told that they needed to focus their efforts on managing resistance to their change initiatives. The most common suggestion was for managers to hone their interpersonal and communication skills so that they could help their staff overcome the pains associated with change. Courses like Global Knowledge’s Management and Leadership Skills for New Managers and People Skills for Project Managers offer managers training in the types of interpersonal and management skills needed to help
with staff deal with change. The skills that can help managers “manage change” include: motivational techniques; team building, coaching, feedback, setting priorities, negotiating priorities, stress management, dealing with conflict, systematic problem-solving, and effective delegation.
3. Change is reality and we experience it in our dailly lives
Managers need to accept the fact that organizational change is inevitable, and, its pace is quickening. Basic economics dictates that an organization must constantly adapt or risk failure. The introduction of new technologies, new global competitors, new legislation, new management, new customers, new ideas, new geopolitical shocks/crises, new investors, etc., force organizations to change the way they do business. According to a survey done by the American Management Association in 2006:
[They surveyed] 1,400 executives and managers and found that 82% of them reported that the pace of change experienced by their organizations has increased compared with five years ago. Further, 7 out of 10 noted their organizations experienced disruptive change during the last year. 4
If organizations do not constantly seek to adapt and keep pace with new demands, or to take advantage of efficacies, they run the risk of under-performing in the market and, ultimately, being forced out. Similarly, given the world we live in, if organizations do not plan for major disruptions to their essential systems (e.g., a terrorist attack, a power outage, the disappearance of a raw resource, global supply-chain interruption, etc.), there is a greater chance they will see their demise sooner than rather than later. In short, managers in the 2000s need to accept the reality of constant and quick change, and manage accordingly.
4. Anticipate what and where the resistance will be and plan for it accordingly.
All managers need to realize that resistance to change is normal. Given that change is an ever-present reality in today’s work place, it is safe to say that resistant behavior is inevitable in most organizations. Managers need to identify this behavior and help staff manage it by utilizing the proper interpersonal and communications skills. However, as time has shown, management training alone will not guarantee that organizational change initiatives will succeed. Students of organizational change today are looking at “managing resistance” as a reactive answer to change management. To manage a successful organizational change, leaders need to
be more proactive in their approach. The question that organizational leaders need to ask themselves today is: Who is responsible for making transitions successful? The answer is clear their management team. If staffare not prepared for change, they will resist it. Therefore, managers need to minimize resistance by anticipating what and where the resistance will be and plan for it. This makes sense as it is ultimately the manager’s responsibility to ensure that employees are ready and willing to embrace change.
How Do You Manage Resistance to Change?
• Tell people the truth and give as much information as you can. Keep giving information as soon or
as often as possible.
• Give them time to digest the news. Do not expect buy-in initially.
• Give them time to vent – there may be anger, and this is normal.
• Listen and empathize! That means truly listen to staff and their concerns! Don’t interrupt or try and
defend, take notes, and summarize what they have said. Empathize does not mean you agree, it
means you understand they are upset. Say so!
• Know that trust between management and staff will be low for a while but will return
• After you have sensed staff are moving past anger, move to the next step. This always takes longer
than you think, so be patient.
• Start getting them involved by asking implementation questions. You can determine what needs to
be done, when, and why – let them determine the how! You can define objectives, constraints and
expectations but let them figure out the how part. The Golden Rule in times of change: Let THEM
determine how the change gets implemented!
• Build on their ideas.
• Work with them to determine reasonable implementation plans, which would should include achievable
tasks and timelines.
5. Become a “Change Promoter”
Global Knowledge’s Change Management Implementation Survey found that employees were still confused about the new requirements and unprepared to handle them.
“This end-user confusion and training avoidance demonstrates that managing change for employees is something that is still not fully understood." Managing in today’s organizations means one must constantly identify when and where change is needed. Managers need to be able to advocate for these transitions to their superiors, their stakeholders, and their staff. In other words, change has to be communicated up, down, and out. This requires a set of skills that may be new to many managers – namely, skills related to planning and managing corporate communications. If a manager sees a way for change to improve business, he or she needs to be able to present a briefing to superiors. This briefing must include the effects on employees in the cost/benefit analysis. Good managers will know this because they have already discussed the change idea with their staff and heard their professional input and personal concerns. If their change initiative is accepted, they will need to work with other affected managers to develop a project plan, including a plan for regular communications to staff to inform them of the
changes, to explain the rationale, and to ensure buy-in (i.e., ease resistance). Is such a communication plan really necessary? According to change experts: Success can be enhanced if managers play an active role in both planning and delivering messages about change initiatives.
These same experts also note that managers probably require specific training to become truly effective change communicators. So, what type of training do today’s successful “proactive” managers require? Training that provides skills and knowledge to help managers prepare for and communicate change initiatives to staff and stakeholders on a continuous basis. Examples of this type of training are included in Global Knowledge’s Successful Workplace Communication course:
• Learn how to communicate with tact and courtesy so that even negative messages are heard and difficult
situations are managed diplomatically.
• Assess and adapt your message to others so they hear the right message and respond in the desired
• Use tactics to communicate up, down, and across your organization and understand that different techniques
work for different levels of employees.
• See the value of planned alliances that will help you overcome obstacles to communication, performance,
2. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution.
New York: HarperBusiness.
4. American Management Association. AGILITY and RESILIENCE in the Face of Continuous Change - A Global
Study of Current Trends and Future Possibilities 2006-2016. New York. 2006.
6. Kress, N. “Engaging Your Employees.”Workspan, 27-36. (2005, May).