Lorenzo de Medici: Machiavelli or Michelangelo?

647 Words2 Pages

Florence during Lorenzo de Medici’s time was a city of contradictions: artistic brilliance sprouted from the squalor of the city’s crowed streets and autocrats ruled over republican institutions. Florence fostered both the grandeur of Botticelli’s Primavera and the harsh realism of Machiavelli’s the prince. Lorenzo de Medici, the de facto ruler of the city, best embodied such contradictions. He was both a Machiavelli, using menace, betrayal, cajoles and schemes to exert power, and a Michelangelo, a poet and artist stimulating the onset of the Renaissance.

The subtleties of Lorenzo’s power lay in the fact that Florence remained a republic on its surface. If the Medici ruled the city, they did so by manipulation behind the scenes, not as princes or kings but as leading citizens. Princes could command and expect to be obeyed by their subjects, but Lorenzo could only persuade and hope to be followed. Lorenzo’s age also complicated his authority. Only those over 45 years old could serve in the signoria. Thus, until he died at the age of 43, Lorenzo remained the unofficial ruler of Flo...

Open Document