Making comparisons between the current state of an idea within modern culture and the same concept as it was in a different time is a difficult task for several reasons. First, the texts concerning how that subject existed in the past may be, to some extent, incomplete or inaccurate. Second, words unquestionably change over time, and it can be difficult, in some cases impossible, for the observer to look back without casting the modern definition over the idea as it would have been understood in the past; this typically causes mistakes in judgment and false conclusions. Based on these issues, it is unlikely that an absolute answer to such a question can be reached, so the best that may be hoped for is a high level of probability that one’s conclusion is correct. With this in mind, the modern investigator can start to answer the question being asked.
In order to decide whether or not purity and impurity are relevant in today’s society, it is important to consider first what these labels mean. In terms of the context within biblical and other ancient texts, there were the subcategories of ritual purity and moral purity, both of which were fundamental in Jewish society, although the level of significance in different sects was varied (Harrington). It is of vital importance though to note that these ideas were central to constructing their social structure and were irrevocable parts of their perceptions of the world around them. Ritual bathing and washing, as well as casting out those who were permanently unclean, were integral practices not only for those of a priestly stature, but for common people as well (Harrington). This is evident through looking at texts that have been preserved in the centuries since and based on archeologic...
... middle of paper ...
... this makes purity less relevant today than in the past, though not altogether irrelevant.
In conclusion, the relevance of purity and impurity is difficult to define when trying to compare their meaning today with what it was in the past. Though it is clear that very few people today consider ritual cleansing to be necessary, apart from those groups which still believe in baptism, moral purity can be said to have had a better continuation over the years without losing too much of its meaning. The main difference between the present and the past in this case seems to be an increased emphasis on sexual purity, but it is possible, though not highly probable, that this conclusion could be inaccurate and that this kind of purity was just as widely talked about by ancient Jews. Overall, purity is still relevant today, but its implications have certainly changed over time.
Oxtoby, Willard Gurdon. "Jewish Traditions." World religions: western traditions. 1996. Reprint. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2011. 127-157. Print.
McKeating, Henry. “Sanctions Against Adultery in Ancient Israelite Society with Some Reflection on Methodology in the Study of Old Testament Ethics.” Journal for the Study of the OldTestament. Vol. XVII (Mar. 1979).
In Shintoism, purity is very important. Shintoism follows the belief that no human is perfect. They believe that all humans are born pure on the inside. Things that make humans impure are tsumi, which is pollution or sin. Shinto followers believe that the ones who cause impurity are evil spirits, and they are the ones who cause evil doings in the world.
1985. “An Interpretation of Sacrifice in Leviticus” in Anthropological Approaches to the Old Testament. Ed., Bernhard Lane.
As we take a look at earlier restrictions on the Christian diet, we have to point to N...
In Western society and culture, religion and morality have often intertwined and they have reflected their values onto each other. Today it is sometimes impossible to make a distinction between the two, since their influence has transcended generations. In modern Western culture, religion and society preach conformity. In order to be a “good” person, one must conform to the values imposed by the church1 and state.
In the household codes of the New Testament the traditional patriarchal social order is reaffirmed, not simply for secular society, but for Christian community. The concept that children are to obey their parents, wives their husbands and slaves their masters is restated in no fewer than five places in the New Testament: Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, Titus, and 1 Peter. Conversely all subjugated persons can be viewed as relations of wives to husbands, children to father, and servants to masters. Patriarchalism refers to the total structure of society in all theses types of relations of domination and subjugation; sons to father, wives to husband, and slaves to masters. Also, there is delegated domination and subjugation within the paternal
Robinson, B. A. (2008, March 30). Books of the Hebrew Scripture . Retrieved May 7, 2011, from Religious Tolerance: http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_otb3.htm
The first century morality was not unlike our twenty-first century morality. Premarital and extra-marital affairs exist in both. Prostitution is common in both centuries. The speed in which sexual perverseness can occur in today’s society can occur at a much more rapid rate due to the Internet, however, with the same outcome as it was then, the defiling of one’s body, a body that belongs to God. God forgives us as Christians, as King David wa...
In the history of humanity, humans have consumed plenty of things, from plants to human flesh. It is all about survival. However as societies became more complex and states began to form, several changes in the diet were created, mostly by religious principles. However there are underlying causes for these dietary restrictions besides the religious aspect. Both Marvin Harris and Mary Douglas propose some of the underlying causes for the dietary restrictions in the old texts. Harris proposes several reasons for the dietary restrictions in the Leviticus, including moral, ethical and functional, while Douglas presents the cost benefit and a historical reasons for dietary restrictions in several religious text.
To be “clean” or “pure” was the most important to those of the 18th century.
and way of living was very different to how things are now in a modern
The codification of deviance can vary widely between different cultures, a norm in one culture can be considered deviant in another. For example, the notion of cannibalism has been proved by anthropologists to be a spiritually divine form of ritualistic sacrifice in the ancient Aztec culture of Mexico. Yet in Western culture murder and the consumption of human flesh is considered highly revolting, dealt with by harsher consequences by law than most other deviant crimes. These differences are due to the way each individual society develops their own moral codes. These codes are often defined by cultural ideologies, adversity to other cultures and ritualistic practises which have become accepted, as well established patterns in the development of culture. Lloyd, M 2007 implies this by saying 'we are born into a pre existing (social) order the comes ready made with a large stock of norms and rules we must learn if we are to participate as c...
approach it from a middle age perspective and, in one form or another, build on what the
Holy Bible: Contemporary English Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1995. Print. (BS195 .C66 1995)