Looking at Kant’s categorical imperative, whether or not an action is moral depends on two formations (1) the rule of universalizability and (2) the rule to treat persons as ends in themselves (Brannigan 108). In his work Fundamental Principles of The Metaphysic of Morals, Kant suggests that “He who contemplates suicide should ask himself whether his action can be consistent with the idea of humanity as an end in itself”(Kant). According to Kant, in order to make the claim that suicide is ethical, the first formation of the categorical imperative would require the willingness to accept such as act as universal law; to accept that everyone should behave the same way. When looking at the second formation, suicide requires one to treat themselves as a means to an end. As Kant considers this an act of self-interest, it can be concluded that suicide, through the idea of categorical imperative, is morally wrong.
St. Thomas Aquinas’ natural law assumes a relationship between an individual and God; the idea of right or wrong being contingent on wh...
... middle of paper ...
...ma which causes problems in moral understanding, especially between cultures. While no ethical theory outright supports the method, it has been argued that certain cultures find certain cases ethical, while others condemn the practice completely. I believe, however, that the most imperative aspect when evaluating ethical issues on a multicultural level is to take the idea of ethical relativism into consideration. Whether or not there is agreement on moral standards or principles between different cultures/theories, all frameworks on which judgment is based is relative to one’s own specific set of principles. When there is a realization that no universal standard exists for all people, each ethical dilemma can be best approached by studying the culture in which the problem is occurring; for understanding lies in the relevant differences and reasons of each theory.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Immanuel Kant was known as a German philosopher in the 18th century. During this time, he came up with the concept of categorical imperative; this concept is described as a moral law that applies to individuals and how they make decisions and approach situations. Kant’s concept is separate from personal motives or desires, it is an obligation that an individual will do something for their themselves and not what may come out of it in the future. In the book “Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals” Kant states, “A rational being must always regard himself as a legislator in a kingdom of ends rendered possible by the freedom of the will whether as member or as sovereign.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1221 words (3.5 pages)
- Kant's Categorical Imperative Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”.... [tags: Philosophy Categorical Imperative Kant Essays]
1532 words (4.4 pages)
- Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason (Pojman and Vaughn 239). According to Kant, there is one good thing that comes without qualification – a good will. Any other act done as only being good with qualification, and only a good will is worthy of happiness. A good will is done because it is one’s duty, not someone just doing a duty. The expected consequences of an act of good will are morally neutral, and therefore irrelevant to moral discussion.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Categorical imperative]
1168 words (3.3 pages)
- Moral decision-making constitutes an important part of the everyday human life. In this paper, I will examine and contrast Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory of the Categorical Imperative, both, which provide people with a moral structure, and how the issue of etiquettes relates to Kantian Theory. It is important to note that both the theories have their advantages and drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Morality]
1620 words (4.6 pages)
- ... Another Philosopher Micael Lacewing objects to this interpretation stating “any action could be justified if stated correctly,” (Kantian ethics: objections). For example, he says he could steal gifts from large shops when there are only seven letters in my name”. Due to a rare case such as this, he argues this law could apply to everyone.” Due to strict nature of this formulation, Lacewing’s argument is entirely credible depict how absurd the argument is. Kant may have expected criticism due to the severe nature as he formulated a more liberal interpretation of the Categorical imperative in which addresses many problems individuals may have adhered to Kant’s personal belief of the theory... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Philosophy, Ayn Rand, Kantianism]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- Melissa Stachowiak Good Life Take-home #2 Professor Gan November 20, 2015 5.) What is the difference between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. In class when we had the conversation about chapter two of Immanuel Kant’s Grounding of Morals, we had discussed the imperatives. The imperatives are broken down into two sections, hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative each having different meanings. Hypothetical imperative is described as a “command that a particular action is necessary as a means to some purpose, such as the attainment of personal happiness” (Kant).... [tags: Categorical imperative, Immanuel Kant]
1389 words (4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was a famous German philosopher (1724-1804). His many philosophical writings influenced large population from all over the world. Even today, his works still form a major point of reference in research carried out in the modern world. His writings had a strong base such that they brought a new dimension in religion, law and history. Although all his writings were popular but Metaphysics of Morals was very influencing. Kant argued that our desires and emotions are categorically imperative, which means that they are conscience driven.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Morality, Philosophy]
1165 words (3.3 pages)
- Analysis of Kant’s Categorical Imperative in Metaphysics Grounding for the metaphysics of morals is a foundation of Kant’s philosophy, in this book, Kant wants to build up a moral kingdom of metaphysical. At first, Kant extracted categorical imperative from the concepts of goodness, will and obligation and enacted some rational principles, then, he plans to map out moral metaphysic through categorical imperative. However, he failed to do so owing to that his theory is founded on purely idealism.... [tags: Philosophy]
2164 words (6.2 pages)
- Utilitarian thought and theory are based on the “Greatest Happiness Principle” which exclaims that actions are considered moral only when they promote universal happiness and the absence of pain. In this paper, I argue that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is superior to utilitarianism because Kant’s Categorical Imperative allows for actions to be judged case by case, as opposed of what’s considered to be the best for maximizing happiness. First and foremost, the Greatest Happiness Principle focuses on two main ideas: one’s actions and their resulting utility.... [tags: Morality, Immanuel Kant, Utilitarianism]
1053 words (3 pages)
- Kant and the Categorical Imperative Kant tried to develop a theory of ethics which relied on reason rather than emotion. While he was not anti-religious, he wanted an ethical system which was not clouded by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. He placed emphasis on motives behind an action rather than, like the Utilitarians, the consequences of an action. He believed that consequences were no guide to whether an action was moral or not. His theory is known as deontological, or duty-based, where ends can never justify the means.He believed that there were general rules which must be adhered to in every circumstance.... [tags: Papers]
913 words (2.6 pages)