Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criticism of john locke social contract theory
Analysis of john lockes political philosopy
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Locke in political philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criticism of john locke social contract theory
John Locke’s Social Contract and Natural Rights Argument in Relation to Free Will
One of the most significant philosophical and political issues for humanity is the conflict of freedom and security. This is often referred to as a balance between the two. This issue has been prevalent for as long as we have had society. In this paper I will discuss some of the theories of the 17th century English philosopher John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government and how they apply to this situation. I plan to then relate his arguments to the problem of free will. In this paper, I will describe John Locke’s theory of social contracts and natural rights in a civil government and then defend his argument.
The philosophical problem of freedom vs. security is one that has been seen for as long as mankind has had governments. The basis of the dilemma entails that people wish to have freedom. However, if all people had complete freedom, then there lies a potential for murder, mayhem, and chaos (since people would have the freedom to do whatever they desired). On the other hand, if society had complete security, then people would have no freedom at all. In other words, the people would have no will; they would be completely manipulated and controlled. Because both extremes (of either complete freedom or complete security) aren’t desired, we must now decide what freedoms are we willing to trade for security and vice versa. This is the objective for the balance between security and freedom. Another philosophical problem I hope to address in this paper is the problem of free will, which aims to determine if free will exists and if so, how? I believe that John Locke provided a good stance for both of these philosophical issues. John Locke was an...
... middle of paper ...
...
"1690." Second Treatise of Civil Government by John Locke. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
"John Locke." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 27 Apr. 2014. Web. 30 Apr. 2014. .
"John Locke | Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism." John Locke | Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2014. .
"John Locke: Second Treatise of Civil Government: Chapter 2." John Locke: Second Treatise of Civil Government: Chapter 2. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2014. .
Uzgalis, William. "John Locke." Stanford University. Stanford University, 2 Sept. 2001. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
John Locke - Two Treatises of Government - “life, liberty, and property” - consent of the governed (people are giving permission to the government to rule)
Trans. William Popple. N.p., c. 1686. - c Print. The.. 4) Locke, John.
Jefferson, Thomas. "The Declaration of Independence." The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues Across the Disciplines. 8th edition, Ed. Gilbert H. Muller. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003. 305-308.
...s his argument by emphasizing the absolute reason on why property is solely for the use to produce goods and provide services by farming one’s land or building infrastructures; nevertheless the overuse of one’s land exhibits what Locke calls waste, whereas the consumption of goods for the use of trade can result in bartering and wealth. The introduction of wealth creates the motivation for people feel compelled to protect their wealth which leads us back to the concept of entering into a civil or political society for security. Locke believes that civil and political society can ensure the stability, security, and social structure of any given society; but he points out that if the government becomes a tyranny or corrupt only than shall the populace exercise their right to question the authority and overthrow if needed.
Rappaport, M. (2015). The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution - Online Library of Law & Liberty. Online Library of Law & Liberty. Retrieved 27 August 2015, from http://www.libertylawsite.org/2015/01/19/the-declaration-of-independence-and-the-u-s-constitution/
In his notable piece, Second Treatise of Government, Locke examines his idea on the concept and role of the Rule of Law. Before the Rule of Law was in order, Locke states there exists a State of Nature; the natural order of man before government exists. In the State of Nature, men are in “a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, an...
According to John Locke everyone has natural rights. John Locke came up with natural rights, by thinking about what they could be for a long and vigorous time. Locke said that natural rights are “life, health, liberty, and possessions” (9). Life is something that no one can take away from anyone. Locke said, “no ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possession” (9). Life is not an absolute right. An example of this is if there was a train full of ten thousand people about to hit a rock, and you are by the switch that could save the ten thousand people, but if you use the switch you are killing a twelve-year-old girl on the other track. Liberty is doing what ever someone wants to do, and they can’t be punished for
Review this essay John Locke – Second treatise, of civil government 1. First of all, John Locke reminds the reader from where the right of political power comes from. He expands the idea by saying, “we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit.” Locke believes in equality among all people. Since every creature on earth was created by God, no one has advantages over another.
Forward thinking John Locke described the government’s purpose in his Second Treatise on government. To this great thinker, political power is “a right of making laws…only for the public good” (Locke). This idea of organization is key to liberty. Government is made to protect the rights of a free person, not to remove or tarnish them. Thus, it is the type...
What John Locke was concerned about was the lack of limitations on the sovereign authority. During Locke’s time the world was surrounded by the monarch’s constitutional violations of liberty toward the end of the seventeenth century. He believed that people in their natural state enjoy certain natural, inalienable rights, particularly those to life, liberty and property. Locke described a kind of social contract whereby any number of people, who are able to abide by the majority rule, unanimously unite to affect their common purposes. The...
Furthermore, Locke's passion for morality is also seen in his interpretation of the social contract. We see that Locke's ideas in freedom of life, liberty, and property have formed the basic morals of past and current governments. One of Edwards's morals that have been seen throughout American history is the infinite sovereignty of G...
Locke and Rousseau present themselves as two very distinct thinkers. They both use similar terms, but conceptualize them differently to fulfill very different purposes. As such, one ought not be surprised that the two theorists do not understand liberty in the same way. Locke discusses liberty on an individual scale, with personal freedom being guaranteed by laws and institutions created in civil society. By comparison, Rousseau’s conception portrays liberty as an affair of the entire political community, and is best captured by the notion of self-rule. The distinctions, but also the similarities between Locke and Rousseau’s conceptions can be clarified by examining the role of liberty in each theorist’s proposed state of nature and civil society, the concepts with which each theorist associates liberty, and the means of ensuring and safeguarding liberty that each theorist devises.
John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt with the issue of political freedom within a society. John Locke's “The Second Treatise of Government”, Mill's “On Liberty”, and Rousseau’s “Discourse On The Origins of Inequality” are influential and compelling literary works which while outlining the conceptual framework of each thinker’s ideal state present divergent visions of the very nature of man and his freedom. The three have somewhat different views regarding how much freedom man ought to have in political society because they have different views regarding man's basic potential for inherently good or evil behavior, as well as the ends or purpose of political societies.
Locke, John. "Second Treatise, Of Civil Government." Woll, Peter. American Government Readings and Cases 16th Edition. New York: Pearson Longman, 2006. 5-6.
In The Social Contract philosophers John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau discuss their differences on human beings’ place of freedom in political societies. Locke’s theory is when human beings enter society we tend to give up our natural freedom, whereas Rousseau believes we gain civil freedom when entering society. Even in modern times we must give up our natural freedom in order to enforce protection from those who are immoral and unjust.