Is Everyone Allowed to Marry?

696 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Portrayal of gays in media

Our society revolves around equality conspicuously in this age. As Charlize Theron once said, “Marriage equality is about more than just marriage. It's about something greater. It's about acceptance.” She, with no doubt, states that possessing the right of marriage, in same sex couples, is more meaningful than one could imagine. The allowance of same sex marriage means a broader acceptance by the surrounding people in the community. Of course, this could be a good thing for same sex couples. In the real world, not everyone agrees with this quote. Through the texts of “The Case against Homosexual Marriage” and “Same Sex Marriage: Just Say No to Prohibition” they contain a similar theme of same sex marriage, a difference of view towards the issue and they correspondingly contain difference in clarification of their opinion. Through both texts of Mohler and Block there’s a similar theme of same sex marriage which both authors discuss about. In Mohler’s essay, he explains his view of same sex marriage. He refers it as homosexual marriage. According to the essay, he states the issue of homosexual marriage displayed in the American people. As a man of religion, he would later justify his side by his beliefs. Likewise as in Mohler’s essay, Block talks about the issue of same sex marriage. In Block’s essay, she addresses about the issue of same sex marriage and the restrictions that couples have. She converses her personal experience that ties in to her view of same sex marriage. Nevertheless, both authors contain an opposite view of the issue, but both authors discuss about the issue thoroughly. Both authors contained a different view of the issue of same sex marriage faced in America. As Mohler stated, “Homosexual couples cannot fulfi... ... middle of paper ... ...ll because they were a same sex couple. This is when Block realized why everyone needs the right to be able to marry their loved one. When clarifying their view of same sex marriage, both stories covered different style of explanation of their view. The idea of same sex marriage can be easily stated as one of the hottest topic in the nation regarding equality. With the popularity of this topic, many people could tell their side towards the issue of same sex marriage. In both texts they contain comparative and contrasting perspectives: the theme of same sex marriage appears in the selections, difference of view position regarding the theme and difference over their elucidation for their side. Overall, not everyone will settle on the idea of equality for same sex couples to marry, but there are people who stalwartly justify equality for these couples' journey of love.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by

    Read More

  • Homosexual Indifference

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    Beginning with the topic on gay marriage and the controversial battle between authors, Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett, Sullivan is the gay supporter. In Sullivan’s piece, “Let Gays Marry,” he opens with a statement by the Supreme Court, “A state cannot deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws.” He feels that this simple sentence has so much meaning, saying that whatever type of person, male or female, black or white, everyone deserves the same legal protection and equal rights. Therefore, gay marriage should not be excluded from the legal system. He tells that some churches practice different beliefs and may oppose gay marriage but religion has nothing to do with the state appeals. Sullivan explains how the definition of marriage has changed in the past and that it can be done again. Sullivan ends his piece by saying that changing the law would not affect straight couples, so why are they against gay marriage? He believes the change would allow gay couples to experience what straight couples already have.

    Read More

  • Colson's Article: The Constitutional Right Of Gay Marriage

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitutional right of gay marriage is a hot topic for debate in the United States. Currently, 37 states have legal gay marriage, while 13 states have banned gay marriage. The two essays, "What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Katha Pollitt and "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson provide a compare and contrast view of why gay marriage should be legal or not. Pollitt argues that gay marriage is a constitutional human right and that it should be legal, while Colson believes that gay marriage is sacrilegious act that should not be legal in the United States and that “it provides a backdrop for broken families and increases crime rates” (Colson, pg535). Both authors provide examples to support their thesis. Katha Pollitt provides more relevant data to support that gay marriage is a constitutional right and should be enacted as law in our entire country, she has a true libertarian mindset.

    Read More

  • Comparing William Bennett's Leave Marriage Alone and Andrew Sullivan's Let Gays Marry

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    What is marriage? For thousands years, marriage has been a combination between a man and a woman. When they love each other, they decide to live together. That is marriage. But what will love happen between two same sex persons? Will they marry? Is their marriage acceptable? It is the argument between two authors: William J. Bennett and Andrew Sullivan. The two authors come from different countries and have different opinion about same sex marriage. Sullivan agrees with the gay marriage because of human right, on the other hand, Bennett contradicts his idea because he believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Even though their theories are totally different, their opinions are very well established.

    Read More

  • Sullivan vs. Bennett

    923 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two texts examined within, present the opposing extremes of views regarding gay and lesbian marriage. The first text entitled Let Gays Marry by Andrew Sullivan examines the intricacies of same sex relationships and why homosexual couples should be allowed to publicly show affection for one another. The second text that will be examined is titled Leave Marriage Alone written by William Bennett. Bennett gives his views on why couples of same sex nature should not be allowed to engage in marital relations. These two authors, although very different, each has a view of the ideals of marriage, and how it should be presented to the public.

    Read More

  • Loving V Virginia Essay

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for

    Read More

  • Arranged Marriages In The United States

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Arranged marriages are typically not practiced in the United States, however, they are still a part of other cultures. While arranged marriages are often seen as a barbaric or outdated practice, they can still be successful. It may not seem important to study arranged marriages since they are not widely practiced in modern America or other western cultures but some benefits of arranged marriages found could be used to lessen the negative image western civilizations have about cultures that continue the practice of arranged marriages. There are definitely drawbacks in the practice of arranged marriage but there are also benefits that are often overlooked.

    Read More

  • Marriage Culture in the United States

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    The culture that exists in America is one that is constantly changing to suit the times and the many different types of people that reside in the country. One aspect of American culture that has changed profoundly is the institution of marriage. Marriage began as the undisputed lifestyle for couples willing to make the ultimate commitment to one another. However in less than a century, pointless and destructive alternatives such as premarital cohabitation, have developed to replace marriage.

    Read More

  • Media Bias: Same Sex Marriage Articles

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article from NBC New York titled “NY Legalizes Gay Marriage” discusses the process by which same sex marriage was legalized, and the reactions that followed this event. In

    Read More

  • Howard Moody Sacred Rite Or Civil Right Summary

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Using multiple examples from his background provides us with a sense of understanding of the complications of both religious and government involvement in the decision to allow same-sex marriage. He demonstrates a solid awareness of who his target audience is and conveys his thoughts in a manner that is easily comprehended. The structure of his article flows nicely and the examples used prove to invite further thoughts on the subject. The highlight of Moody’s piece for me was this, “When our beloved Constitution was written, blacks, Native Americans and… women were quasi-human beings with no rights or privileges, but today they are recognized… with full citizenship rights. The definition of marriage has been changing over the centuries… it will change yet again as homosexuals are seen as ordinary human beings.”

    Read More

  • Why The M Word Matters To Me By Edward Sullivan

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay “Why The M Word Matters To Me” by Andrew Sullivan, he states “This isn’t about gay marriage. It’s about marriage. It’s about family. It’s about love” (159). A student’s response to this statement made by Sullivan prompted him to claim that Sullivan was not speaking about marriage itself - as a concept, more rather weddings in particular within his essay. I fully agree with this student’s response and as a result, I shall be thoroughly analyzing the validity of his claim outright.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bennett is a conservative republican who is a strong advocate for family values. The purpose of Bennett’s essay is to expose the downside of Andrew Sullivan’s argument in favor of same-sex marriage. He wants to persuade those who have read Sullivan’s essay to side with him. His audience seems to be primarily middle-aged heterosexuals who already take his stance on the topic.

    Read More

  • Same-Sex Marriage Affirmative Case

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the last years the topic of same-sex marriage has been of great importance to our society. The idea of the same gender being lawfully married is disturbing to a group of people but in the recent years the number of supporters has increased. The cases that argue for the legalization of same-sex marriage are focusing on the relationship of the individuals and do not see anything in same-sex marriage that could harm our society as a whole. The article “How the President go to ‘I Do’ on Same-Sex Marriage,” published by Joe Becker in April 2014, explains how Barack Obama started saying that he was undecided about the subject matter but is now leaning toward the legalization of same-sex marriage. The subject matter takes a lot of analyzing of what pros and cons are to come from the legalization of same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a global argument that deals with unifying two individuals of the same gender under the law. The main reason that supporters give for justifying same-sex marriage is that it is for the same reason as straight people, to show love and commitment to each other. Furthermore, the argument of same-sex marriage is difficult to generalize because of the multiple factors that need to be taken in consideration when making any decision regarding this topic. Although Becker does have true premises, he lacks clarity in his terms which make his argument be false and invalid.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.

    Read More

  • Same Sex Marriage Is Not Acceptable

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court came to the conclusion that marriage is a right protected by the U.S. constitution in all 50 states. Prior to their decision, same sex marriage was legal in 37 states, including Washington D.C. Same sex marriage goes against what the bible says. I feel that homosexuality is unnatural and immoral. Gay marriage is incompatible with the beliefs of several Christian.

    Read More

More about Is Everyone Allowed to Marry?

Open Document