Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ageism in america today
Age discrimination in the workplace brief introduction
Age discrimination in the workplace brief introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ageism in america today
The Influence of Ageism in Public Policy
The United States is ill prepared to meet the needs of the aging baby boom generation. Nowhere is this more evident than in government policy, particularly in housing. Overall, American society has become complacent in the assumption that existing “programs enacted to provide older Americans with health insurance; nutritional, legal, supportive, and leisure services; housing; home repair; energy assistance; transportation; help in getting jobs; protection against getting fired from jobs; public insurance for employer-sponsored pensions, and special mental health programs” are sufficient to meet the needs of this nation’s seniors (Binstock, 2005, p. 73). Despite political rhetoric that touts services to the elderly as the last bastion of the American population subject to “Draconian budget cuts”, policymakers have consistently decreased funding to programs that assist older Americans, and have intentionally ignored discriminative practices that directly affect the quality of life for older adults (Gans, 2010). In fact, this student would argue that policymakers have made little more than a half-hearted effort to revisit existing programs benefitting older adults, especially in the areas of housing and employment. Even more troubling, is the clandestine acceptance of ageism in policy, and the tendency to view those programs directly benefitting older adults as “scapegoats for the budget deficit” according to Binstock (2005, p. 74). With the population of the elderly expected to swell to “68.5 million by 2050” (Folts and Yeatts, 1994, p. 6), policymakers and society will be compelled not only to reexamine those programs benefitting older adults, but to address the overall stigma attached with...
... middle of paper ...
...11 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/housing.pdf
Schroeder, P. (2008, February 5). HUD budget proposal features CDBG cuts, elimination of HOPE VI. Bond Buyer, 32. Retrieved April 23, 2011 from http://0-ehis.ebscohost.com.wncln.wncln.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&hid=20&sid=363f40eb-521b-4cc7-b57f-17742d2a6738%40sessionmgr11
Travis, L. (2010, April). Protecting elderly homeowners: Reverse equity mortgages as a foreclosure intervention tool. Retrieved April 20, 2011 from http://academicarchive.snhu.edu/bitstream/handle/10474/1649/sced2010travis.pdf?sequence=2
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2010, July 14). The state of fair housing: Annual report on fair housing FY 2009, pp. 1-103. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved April 21, 2011 from http://www.hud.gov/content/releases/fy2009annual-rpt.pdf
The United States’ government has always had a hand on our country’s housing market. From requiring land ownership to vote, to providing public housing to impoverished families, our government has become an irremovable part of the housing market. The effects of these housing policies can affect American residents in ways they might not even recognize. As several historians have concluded, many housing policies, especially those on public housing, either resulted in or reinforced the racial segregation of neighborhoods.
Showing Appleton, WI (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://sundown.afro.illinois.edu/sundowntownsshow.php?id=566 Title VIII: Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (n.d.). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved November 24, 2013, from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/progdesc/title8 Wexler, L. (2005, October 23).
Squires, G. D., Friedman, S., & Siadat, C. (2001). Housing Segregation in the United States: Does Race Matter? Cambridge, MA.
In 1965 the first Aging American’s Act was passed. This legislation was part of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society reform. In passing this legislation nearly 50 years ago, the government created a new department the focused on the rights and needs of the gaining population called the United States Administration on Aging. The original legislation was complete with seven titles. The articles include Title I—the Declaration of Objectives for Older Americans; Title II—Establishment of Administration on aging; Title III—Grants for state and community programs on aging; Title IV—Activities for health and independence, and longevity; Title V—Community service senior opportunities act; Title VI—Grants for Native Americans; and Title VII—allotments for vulnerable elder rights protection activities. Each of these titles are present in the most recent Aging Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2013. Each of the titles in the original and reauthorization have levels of measure to ensure that the legislation is enacted in a manner that will protect the aging population. The titles provide guidance to involved organizations and caregivers ensuring each is properly educated in treating the medical and mental health needs of the aging population as well as recognizing, reporting, and preventing elderly abuse, neglect, and physical, mental, and financial exploitation.
are forced to live off of. What happens if there is not enough to go
In contrast to popular assumption, discrimination in public housing is becoming more prevalent than ever before. Testing done by the Fair Housing Center of Greater Boston has found that today people of color are discriminated against in nearly half of their efforts to buy, sell, finance, or rent property (“1968-Present Housing Discrimination). The statistics are even worse when considering colored people who have families as the testing found that they are discriminated against approximately two thirds of the time (“1968-Present Housing Discrimination”) In addition to facing great difficulty in property affairs, people of color are less likely to be offered residence in desirable locations. 86 percent of revitalized
Donovan, S. (2007, September 25). Fair Housing Laws and Presidential Executive Orders -HUD. Fair Housing Laws and Presidential Executive Orders - HUD. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/FHLaws
The term “ageism” is not easily understood by most of the population because of its acceptance as normal behavior due to the ingrained attitudes that most people develop in their youth, but health care workers must fully embrace the term within their profession in order to avoid becoming a contributor to the historical prevalence of prejudices and discrimination. The term ageism is defined by Klein and Liu (2010) as “the discrimination of individuals based solely on age” (p. 334). “Ageism is a social construct that is internalized in the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of individuals” (Klein & Liu, 2010, p. 334). Robert Butler, a well-known gerontologist, coined the term “ageism” citing that the discrimination and prejudice associated with this term is often based on the lack of a person’s experience with older people (Ferrini & Ferrini, 2013, p. 6). Ferrini and Ferrini (2013) refer to the strong influence that cultural beliefs and attitudes as well as a person’s current age influence the perception of aging (p. 6). Everywhere within society there are influences that encourage ageist attitudes such as media conveyances through movies, books, television, greeting cards, magazines and the Internet (Ferrini and Ferrini, 2013, p. 6). These negative connotations related to growing older begin to influence all people at a very young age and therefore impact their attitudes as they make career decisions. This has directly impacted the number of health care providers who specialize in geriatrics as well as the attitudes of those who do provide services for older adults. These false perceptions and negative attitudes are currently impacting the q...
Adults entering the midlife years (middle adulthood) are experiencing an overabundance of life changes. Hall, Hernandez, Wong, and Justice (2015) stated that, during middle adulthood important changes occur across the physical, cognitive, and social domains of development. There is a mounting amount of research on the changes that middle-aged adults experience. One of the most unexplored factor that middle-aged adults experience is Ageism. Ageism can be defined as the act of being prejudice or discriminative towards a specific age group. Although, Ageism can occur at any given place and in any age group. Research shows that it is more prevalent in older adults,
Attitudes are the foundation of quality of care for older adults. Among health care professionals, discrimination and stereotypical behaviors are very prevalent, even though more often than not these individuals do not realize their actions are ageist. “Ageism hinders people from seeing the potential of aging, anticipation their own aging, and being responsive to the needs of older people” (McGuire, Klein & Shu-Li, 2008, p. 12). Attitudes are directly correlated with how individuals age and whether individuals stay health and live longer (McGuire, Klein & Shu-Li, 2008, p. 12). The care that older adults receive from healthcare professionals is directly influenced by that provider’s attitude about growing older. All too often, health care providers rely on a patient’s chronological age rather than their functional age when determining their needs and what interventions are prescribed. Another issue lies in providers viewing the complaints of older patients as a part of “normal aging”, therefore potentially missing life-threatening problems that may have been easily resolved. “Age is only appropriate in health treatment as a secondary factor in making medical decisions, and it should not be used as a stand-alone factor” (Nolan, 2011, p. 334).
Housing in inner city areas was poor quality and in a 1991 census it was found that over 1 million homes in the inner cities still lacked the basic amenities of bathrooms, WC’s and hot water. The occupants have low incomes and are often elderly, young
Sundquist, Eric J. King’s Dream. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. United States. HUD.gov. -. History of Fair Housing.
In result of social security, people aged sixty-five and older are the second-richest age group in the United States. Political economists recently estimated the government spends $350 billion on senior citizens, more than on national defense! In conclusion, the vulnerability of senior citizens and their reliance on these programs has caused an explosion in senior citizen voter turnout and open political participation. The fear of losing benefits was very strong in the 1996 election, where both President Clinton and Senator Dole were found to campaign strongly in areas with an abundance of senior citizens, such as in Florida. In result of the fear of losing their civil rights and continued use of these programs, senior citizens continue to be very politically active which causes a strong influence on the president.
Uhlenberg, Peter. 1992. “Population Aging and Social Policy.” Annual Review, Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Affordable Housing. HUD User Publications Organization: Affordable Housing. Assisted Housing Alert: Section 8 Low-Income Housing. Alliance for Healthy Homes: Crisis in Affordable Housing. WATCH: