Analysis Of Hamlet: Lunacy On Debate In Hamlet

1094 Words3 Pages

Hamlet: Lunacy on Debate
In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there is an abundance of evidence that points to Hamlet deliberately feigning fits of madness for the purpose of confusing and disconcerting the king and his court. Hamlet has vowed to act “strange and odd” but his actions during the play lead the reader to assume the protagonist in this play has indeed gone mad; due to the convincing insanity portrayal on Hamlet’s part. Nonetheless, Hamlet displays an ability to think rationally, contemplate, and plan, unlike an insane individual.
His erratic behavior toward Ophelia, the murder of Polonius, and the death of his father followed by his clairvoyance are scenes in the play, in which Hamlet devises a plan to act insane; but his madness is in actuality, genius.
Hamlet is a revenge tragedy that focuses on Hamlet’s desire to avenge his father’s death. It is important to realize why and at which point Hamlet decides to feign madness. Hamlet gets the idea from Horatio following the death, and the meeting of his father’s
Ophelia’s life and death can be seen as the true tragedy of this play. Ophelia is driven truly mad by her reversal of fortune and her realization of Hamlet’s insanity; it is then she realizes that she is powerless without the men in her life. She has a conversation with Laertes in which they speak explicitly about her chasity, and the loss of her virginity. A fragile woman, Hamlet sees her obedience, and incorporates her into his plan for revenge by pursuing her as a love interest. He uses her in this plot in order to keep up the insanity charade, because Ophelia herself is not mentally stable by far. After Ophelia chooses to remain loyal to her father over Hamlet, infuriating him; rejecting her for displaced loyalty. This does not sound like the acts of a mad man, but rather a man with a game plan in mind; each move of the pawn crucial in his quest for

More about Analysis Of Hamlet: Lunacy On Debate In Hamlet

Open Document