Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What are the drawbacks of this pandemic
What are the social impacts of pandemics
Effect of natural disasters on less economically
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What are the drawbacks of this pandemic
David Clark the author of the book Germs, Genes and Civilization explains the importance of diseases and epidemics through history. Though most diseases and epidemics have played a huge role in creating history, most have gone unnoticed. Clark argues that there are positives and negatives effects that have affected our growing world due to pestilence. Clark explains that disease is a relatively new theory that evolved with growing cities and agriculture. With growth in industry and agriculture came pestilence, which has affected history positively and negatively.
Through this book, it was hard to believe that pestilence has shaped our society positively. Clark makes many points that are supported proving that with diseases and epidemics society has improved. Clark explains in the book that the population will decrease dramatically due to pestilence, but the population will eventually recover and the population will consist of larger amount of individuals that are resistant to that particular outbreak (3). Exposure to pestilences has affected the human genome. Clark states that every time a disease effects a population the individuals undergo genetic selection. Genetic selection allows individuals with alterations to their genetic code to have resistance, which means a higher chance of survival (5). Due to epidemics through time, which has allowed for genetic alterations, our society is much more protected against individual infections. An example of resistance is shown in both smallpox and bubonic plaque. At the beginning of time, when these diseases were new, this disease was highly lethal and killed most of the population. With continued epidemics through history, the death rate has decreased dramatically due to past genetic ex...
... middle of paper ...
...ce has driven history. Pestilence has had its negative and positive effects on our society. Even though disease is thought to be negative, positive aspects have come out of most epidemics and diseases. Disease has led to innovation, cleaner living and working conditions, disease resistance, and higher survival rates. Overall, with pestilence our living standards have increased dramatically. Though disease is positive, we must remember that pestilence has killed millions that were too weak. Clark’s goal of the book was to teach his readers that there is positive and negative effects that come out of all situations. No matter what happens to our society, we are able to rebound and come out of the pestilence stronger than before.
Works Cited
Clark, David P. Germs, Genes, & Civilization: How Epidemics Shaped Who We Are Today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT, 2010. Print.
“Future nations will know by history only that the loathsome smallpox has existed and by you extirpated”. This quote comes from Thomas Jefferson to Edward Jenner, he founder of the smallpox vaccine. It would only be 100 years later that Jefferson would see his dream fulfilled, but not without struggle. In House on Fire, author William H. Foege shares his first hand view of the lengths that society needed to go through to rid the world of the disease that had plagued it for so long. The story of the fight against smallpox extends long before our efforts for global eradication and is a representation of how society deals with widespread disease. House on
One of the determining factors of a person’s survival from the variola virus during the period of the American Revolution in North America was race. Even though the variola virus in and of itself does not factor in race to determine whether to infect one person over another, race did factor in significantly in the survival rate when exposed to the virus. Part of Fenn’s argument is that Europeans had an innate immunity over diseases that those who were not from Europe did not have. She argued that since Europeans come from a world with a large array of diseases their bodies had built up certain protections against the variola virus. This innate immunity that Fenn discussed brought about certain mechanisms within the body that pr...
3.Stevenson, J. (2004, Sept.). Impact of Infectious Diseases on Development of Human Societies. MBI. July 18, 2005:
The Columbian exchange was the widespread transfer of various products such as animals, plants, and culture between the Americas and Europe. Though most likely unintentional, the byproduct that had the largest impact from this exchange between the old and new world was communicable diseases. Europeans and other immigrants brought a host of diseases with them to America, which killed as much as ninety percent of the native population. Epidemics ravaged both native and nonnative populations of the new world destroying civilizations. The source of these epidemics were due to low resistance, poor sanitation, and inadequate medical knowledge- “more die of the practitioner than of the natural course of the disease (Duffy).” These diseases of the new world posed a serious
William H. McNeill makes a monumental contribution to the knowledge of humanity in his book Plagues and Peoples. He looks at the history of the world from an ecological point of view. From this viewpoint the history of human civilization is greatly impacted by changing patterns of epidemic infection. Plagues and Peoples suggests that "the time scale of world history...should [be] viewed [through] the "domestication" of epidemic disease that occurred between 1300 and 1700" (page 232). "Domestication" is perceived "as a fundamental breakthrough, directly resulting from the two great transportation revolutions of that age - one by land, initiated by the Mongols, and one by sea, initiated by Europeans" (page 232). This book illustrates how man's environment and its resident diseases have controlled human migration, as well as societal successes and failures. McNeill discusses the political, demographical, and psychological effects of disease on the human race. He informs his audience that epidemics are still a viable threat to society, and warns of potential future consequences.
...ails are lost to history, and the cultural changes are immeasurable (Snipp 1989). The rapid spread of new disease took the lives of millions. Native Americans stood no chance, as they had no treatment or ways to fight these diseases.
McNeil WH. Plagues and peoples: a natural history of infectious diseases. New York: Anchor Press,1976.
The Great Plague was a pandemic that killed many people, and for the people from the olden times the plague equaled painful death; it was torture. As a result, many people categorize ‘the Great Plague’ as a catastrophe that had caused huge damage in Europe, but without this epidemic, we many not have had substantial changes that lead us to the modern day we have now.
I have decided to write about four conditions, three of which are detailed in “Survival of the Sickest”, a book written by Dr. Sharon Moalem about how genetic diseases may have evolved to help the human race survive in the past. The diseases which I chose are Hemochromatosis, Diabetes, Transposons, and Sickle cell anemia. I decided to write about hemochromatosis because of how it affects the body by overloading the body with iron, how it evolved in Vikings to minimize iron deficiencies, and how it spread across the population as the Vikings began inbreeding as they colonized Europe. I chose to write about diabetes because of how it may have evolved to prevent blood from freezing during the Last Ice Age, and because of the impact which it has on society. I wrote about transposons, despite the fact that these are not diseases, because of the role they play in the development of cancer, the way they are used in cancer research, and the way they have affected the evolution of life. Lastly, I decided to write about sickle cell anemia because of its interesting relationship with a disease which continues to run rampant in Africa.
This disease was a negative impact on Europe it changed the way people were such as their characteristics, and the fight for survival turned people against each other, “ brother against brother”. “About 25 percent to 50 percent” of Europe’s population downgraded that took Europe 400 years to gain back population to how it was. There was also weakness in the economy because a small population has fewer taxes.
It cannot be argued that the Black Plague was detrimental to every aspect of Europe’s communities. It was a powerful epidemic that wiped out a third of the continent’s population. Out of the midst of all its terror, however, positive after effects presented themselves. Some of these effects included revolutions in the church and society, eventually leading to the separation of church and state. Feudalism was also challenged as peasants demanded wages and revolted. Along with social changes came technological innovations, new inventions, and an attention to hygiene and the beginning of modern medicine. The plague may have devastated Europe, but it also gave way to a new era.
For centuries, well before the basic notions of infectious diseases were understood, humans have realized that climate changes effect epidemic diseases (Patz et al.). The Roman aristocracy retreated to the hills each summer to avoid malaria and the South Asians learned that early in the summer, heavily curried foods were less likely to cause diarrheal diseases (Patz et al.). Patz et al. stated that there have been three distinct transition periods that changed the human to microbe relationship. Those three transition periods are: 1) Early human settlements enabling enzootic infective species to enter the human population, 2) Early Eurasion civilizations swapped dominant infections by military and commercial contact, and lastly, 3) European expansionism over the past five centuries caused the spread of often lethal infectious diseases. They also state that we could be in the fourth transition, with climate change having a wide range of impacts on the occurrence of infectious diseases in human populations.
Although populations in ancient societies suffered attacks, invasions, starvation, and persecution, there was a more efficient killer that exterminated countless people. The most dreaded killers in the ancient world were disease, infections and epidemics. In many major wars the main peril was not gunfire, nor assault, but the easily communicable diseases that rapidly wiped out whole divisions of closely quartered soldiers. Until the time of Hippocrates, in the struggle between life and death, it was, more often than not, death that prevailed when a malady was involved. In the modern world, although illness is still a concern, advances in thought and technique have led to the highest birth rates in recorded history. No longer is a fever a cause for distress; a quick trip to the store and a few days of rest is the current cure. An infection considered easily treatable today could have meant disablement, even death to an ancient Greek citizen.
During the early 1600’s colonizing began in America and while more and more Europeans came over so did their diseases, which were uncommon to America. Some of the main diseases were measles, yellow fever and small pox, diseases Native Americans had never came in contact with and could not fight off due to the lack of genetic imm...
In the 1960s, doctors in the United States predicted that infectious diseases were in decline. US surgeon Dr. William H. Stewart told the nation that it had already seen most of the frontiers in the field of contagious disease. Epidemiology seemed destined to become a scientific backwater (Karlen 1995, 3). Although people thought that this particular field was gradually dying, it wasn’t. A lot more of it was destined to come. By the late 1980s, it became clear that people’s initial belief of infectious diseases declining needed to be qualified, as a host of new diseases emerged to infect human beings (Smallman & Brown, 2011).With the current trends, the epidemics and pandemics we have faced have created a very chaotic and unreliable future for mankind. As of today, it has really been difficult to prevent global epidemics and pandemics. Although the cases may be different from one state to another, the challenges we all face are all interconnected in this globalized world.