Magic Of Love Poem Analysis

1156 Words3 Pages

Explication: Magic of Love vs. Love Poem “Love Poem” is a twenty-four-line poem in six stanzas. The generic tittle is an accurate description of the poem; it is a clue that this may not be a traditional example of love poetry. Both poems have the same rhyme scheme because the second and fourth line of every stanza rhyme. However, “Magic of Love’ speaks of a general love bringing happiness, joy and comfort. While “Love Poem” is much more personal. The speaker talks of memories with his clumsy love. Both poems have a different point of view when it comes to love. In Ferrier’s poem, she describes love as something perfect, that fixes everything. However, in Frederick’s poem, he doesn’t speak about what the love does right but rather he talks …show more content…

“Magic of Love” by Helen Ferries is a greeting card that relies on clichés. On the other hand, “Love Poem” by John Frederick Nims written in 1947 is a poetry that transfigures and expresses an emotion through an original use of language.
The poem by Helen Ferries expresses what love can bring. In the first stanza Helen use the personification “there’s a wonderful gift that can give you a lift”, giving love human-like characteristics. Meaning that love can make you feel light and happy. She uses the cliché “it’s a blessing from heaven above” to anesthetizes readers instead of alerting them. Helen refer that love is something that is sacred and one should hold on to it and never let it go. To me it also means that God sent the right person that you were made for to you. Ferries compares love to a star because stars most of the time are drawn in a yellowish color. Yellow is the color of the sun which makes the reader believe that love gives you that warmth feeling of everything being okay. In the second stanza she uses a simile, “like a star in the …show more content…

In “Love Poem” Nim uses a metaphor in the first stanza to emphasize his love clumsiness. Frederick says “whose hands shipwreck vases” describing his love as a clumsy and destructive woman. This metaphor specifically compares his love’s hands to shipwreck vases suggesting that her hands are as destructive as storms are to ships. This metaphor can be also classified as a hyperbole. The breaking of a vase is not normally something you would refer to with the term “shipwreck” but this phrase exaggerates the image of the poem. Line two to four are examples of hyperbole. Farris uses imagery in stanza three to portray the speaker’s affection for his “unpredictable dear.” He uses alliteration in this stanza when he says “taxi drivers’ terror” to emphasize the chaos she causes on the road. The poet appears amused by her inconsistency when driving. This can be seen through the contrast he makes between her “shrinking” from traffic one minute and then “leaping” the next. Nims uses this alliteration and imagery to exaggerate his love flaws. Furthermore, more in stanza five Frederick uses personification when he says “your lipstick grinning on your coat” emphasizes her clumsiness. In the second stanza the persona contrasts this clumsiness with objects to her skills in dealing with people. In the last two line of the last stanza the tone changes entirely. No matter how clumsy

Open Document