Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interpretive Lit. Analysis of Hamlet
Theme and symbols in the wife of Bath's tale
Literary analysis of hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Interpretive Lit. Analysis of Hamlet
Examine the role of sin (or transgression) in three texts that we have discussed in the latter half of this semester.
When reading The wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale, The Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale and Hamlet I was able to see that sin was a very serious subject during that time, plays, stories and comedies were made explaining what a sin was and alerting people to be careful of committing a sin. Which make me remember how a long time ago during youth group we learned that the bible mentioned 667 sins, the whole group was amazed at how many were found, the person giving the devotional said that the reason the bible tells us what is a sin is to prevent us from doing them. A sin as it was taught to us is when a person commits and immoral act that could be considered a transgression against the divine law or bible. The role of sins as it was written by Chaucer and Shakespeare was the line between being saved and going to hell, each story as presented by them has a meaning, a lesson to be learned. Most stories seem to me were written as a warning to the audience, even though Chaucer used humor when writing his tales the lesson to be learned was still as strong as the one taught by Shakespeare in Hamlet. In the Wife of Bath’s prologue and tell sin played a big part, the wife was so lustful that she married 5 times but to her it was a normal thing, while in The Pardoner’s Tale sin was seen as something major but that you could pay somebody (a pardoner) to forgive your sins and be saved, in Hamlet the sin was vengeance and in the play it was showed how it destroyed everybody involved. Sin one way or another was the main topic in all three plays and made up 60 % of the story.
In the play "the wife of bath's prologue and tale" written...
... middle of paper ...
... go to heaven so he decided not to do it. Finally at the end of this play it was shown how revenge ended up being a killing spree, how we should be cautious before we also becoming sinners.
Overall, the role of sin in each tale was to teach a lesson, to prove that sin could be prevented and that each author view of sin was different. In The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale, the wife was a lustful woman who just wanted to have the blessing to keep on marrying yet she also wanted to feel free of sin, in The Pardoner’s Tale, the author wanted to show the audience that sometimes we preach about the same sin that we are committing, while the sin in Hamlet was a different one since he was seeking revenge and ended up losing his life. After reading these plays I was able to see that all three presented different types of sins yet in each there was a lesson to be learned.
that, in the belief of the time, would damn his soul. In fact, in one soliloquy in Act III,
Gluttony, Avarice, Wrath, Lust, Pride, Envy, and Sloth are all commonly known as the “Seven Deadly Sins”. Each of these seven sins plays a major role in development of the different characters. In Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Canterbury Tales”, the Pardoner committed sins through gluttony and avarice; the Wife of Bath through Pride and Lust; and also the Monk through gluttony and wrath. However, omnipresent on all the characters are the different deadly sins that led to their development and morality.
The Seven Deadly Sins, is a classification of sins (sometimes referred to as vices), that were used to describe the sources of all sins. The Seven Deadly Sins is a Christian idea and was most widespread in the Catholic Church. These sins are thought to have possibly gotten their origins from two places in the Bible, Proverbs 6:16-19, and Galatians 5:19-21. The first idea for The Seven Deadly Sins was from the writings of the monk, Evagrius Ponticus, who lived in the fourth-century. The Seven Deadly Sins were edited and modeled into their modern form in A.D. 590 by Pope Gregory 1. These sins are as
Sin is the “wrongful conduct of a moral code selected by either society or the transgressor.” Sin is one of the main themes in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. The Puritan society that Hester Prynne resides in does not accept people who deny to follow the moral code of the town. Throughout the novel three main characters are involved with the act of sin, Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth.
This passage serves to develop the theme of revenge. This passage proves to be a turning point in the play. Hamlet realizes that God has created
There are seven deadly sins that, once committed, diminish the prospect of eternal life and happiness in heaven. They are referred to as deadly because each sin is closely linked to another, leading to other greater sins. The seven deadly sins are pride, envy, anger, sloth, gluttony, avarice, and lechery. Geoffrey Chaucer's masterpiece, The Canterbury Tales, provided an excellent story about the deadly sins. Focusing mainly on the sins of pride, gluttony and greed, the characters found in The Canterbury Tales, particularly The Pardoner's Tale, were so overwhelmed by their earthly desires and ambitions that they failed to see the effects of their sinful actions, therefore depriving themselves of salvation.
Theology and different religions, all contain information about sin. Sin is recognized as an unholy thing to possess, therefore, sin is not taken lightly. In Roman Catholicism, if one’s sins are serious enough, one may not receive eternal life with God, in Heaven. Severe punishments may occur, if one sins. Sin is thought to have been caused by mankind. The perception of sin continues to evolve as the analysis of texts continues.
In this essay, I will consider Death and Sin in Shakespearean drama and I would like to look at three of Shakespeare's tragic plays: "Hamlet", "Othello" and "King Lear".
... as anything more than simple entertainment. I think this play was trying to communicate that revenge is not the best option. Although every situation is different, usually when one takes revenge against someone they end up negatively affected or right where they didn’t want to be in the first place.
However, throughout the play we discover his soft heart and often his inability to act. By this he is betraying his father’s command. This betrayal is more than evident in this soliloquy. His mind is tainted by the thought that if he were to avenge while Claudius is “praying”, Claudius would go to heaven. Essentially in this soliloquy, William Shakespeare reveals the moral problems associated with committing revenge in a corrupt world. Again, Hamlet finds a way to excuse himself fro...
The main character, Hamlet, is a character that is not true to others, nor to himself. When the Ghost of his father tells him he was murdered by Claudius, Hamlet doubts the truth. He does not trust the ghost of his father, so has to find a way to prove it. Deciding on how to prove or disprove the Ghost, Hamlet predicts: “The play’s the thing / Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King” (2.2, 616-17). Because he distrusts the Ghost, Hamlet is not true to his father. However, when his plan proves to him that the Ghost’s words are true, Hamlet still does not act; he still cannot avenge his father’s murder. Hamlet decides not to kill Claudius, using the fact that he is praying as an excuse. Hamlet does not want Claudius’s soul to go to heaven, therefore he decides not to kill him, explaining: “A villain kills my father, and for that, I, his sole son, do the same villain send to heaven” (3.3, 76-78). However, after trying to pray, the King claims that his prayers were not heard: “My words fly up, my thoughts remain below. / Words without thoughts never to heaven go” (3.3, 97-8). Therefore, had Hamlet chosen to kill Claudius at that time, his soul would have gone to Hell. Hamlet uses God as an excuse for not acting. He is not true and is lying to himself, because he wants to kill Claudius, yet does not.
Chaucer used controversies to create character. He wanted his characters to teach the readers something new about life. The Wife of Bath and the Pardoner demonstrate Chaucer’s way of creating characters based on the sexuality of the medieval period.
Once Hamlet is positive that King Claudius did kill his father after catching his guilty conscience during the “Murder of Garbanzo,” he decides to murder him. Upon following out his scheme, Hamlet goes to kill Claudius but he is in the middle of prayer, so Hamlet repents. Claudius is praying to ask forgiveness for murdering his brother, but he is not full-heartedly sorry. Claudius is Catholic and does not want to die with sins on his soul, so he tries to repent his sins but is not genuine. Hamlet decides not to kill him because it would not be fair for Claudius to get to go to Heaven for dying while praying because his father did not get the same chance; King Hamlet died sinful, and Hamlet believes he is now in Hell because of
The puzzling tragedy that is Hamlet will forever be speculated, which is why it has attracted such attention and praise. The madness in which Hamlet lives draws decisions of polarizing weight. Stay righteous and live out your life with your father’s killer? Or do you slay him and suffer before god and the law? It bears moments of wisdom, followed by inexplicable actions and Vis versa. One moment you find the protagonist staring at his girlfriend with his pants at his ankles, the next you find him contemplating the value of life. It’s hard to determine what the message behind the wildcard character that Hamlet is. William Shakespeare’s tragedy “Hamlet” unravels opposing subjects, superstition instead of righteousness, private revenge or public revenge; it portrays the contradictions emerging in the religious revival of the Renaissance as “Christian humanism” was taking form in Western Europe. An aspect of the play reveals and mocks the hypocrisy of the kingdoms as they exert authority and pose as the ideal of religion. The king is a murderer who prays to god without belief. The one who attempts to remain righteous is an outcast amongst his kingdom. The biggest speculation is drawn on the rectitude of revenge. Does Hamlet have the right to kill his uncle? If so, does Laertes then have the right to kill Hamlet? Is Fortinbras the only exception of just revenge when he is motivated by honor, while the others rage over personal revenge? In the wake of these quarrels, the most evident and obvious Christian Humanist belief is held true...evil never wins. The punishment of those who died in Hamlet is virtuous and deserving. Those who stooped to treachery suffered the consequence.
...major sin, he also knows that he must avenge his father's death. He could not continue to live knowing that he was not able to put his father's soul to rest, "My thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth."