Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Revenge on the count of monte cristo essay
Revenge on the count of monte cristo essay
The count of monte cristo and how dante changed throughout the novel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Revenge on the count of monte cristo essay
How is a person supposed to act when they are betrayed? The thought of revenge is something that every human thinks about in times of betrayal. It is necessary for someone to know if taking revenge is appropriate or not. In the book “The Count of Monte Cristo”, by Alexander Dumas, revenge is a prominent theme throughout the book. It is mostly shown with the main character of the book, Edmond Dantes. His revenge was justified even though some of his acts of revenge had unintended outcomes for others. You may wonder where should a person draw the line when it comes to revenge? In the book, Edmond Dantes is a hard working first mate on the Pharaon, and doesn’t do anything outside of the ordinary. His whole entire life changed within moments, and he went from having a good life, to being locked up in the Chateau D’if. After he realized that he had been wrongly accused of his treason, that’s when he drew the line. One example of how Edmond Dantes got his revenge on the people that brought him down was how he handled his past affairs with Danglars. Danglars was the man behind the fraud letter, which sent Dantes to the chateau d’if for treason. He helped Fernand and Villefort do this because he then would be able to become captain of the Pharaon. Danglars also let Dantes father die of starvation. Dantes got his revenge on Danglars in what might be one of the most intricate ways throughout the whole entire book. Danglars took away his freedom by making the false letter, all just for a little personal gain. To a man like Edmond Dantes, freedom is one of the things he valued most because he wasn’t considered a wealthy man like Danglars. So what Dantes did was take away what mattered most to Danglars, his money. Dantes had earlier funded D... ... middle of paper ... ... refused by Mercedes, but he then read a passage in Faria's writing that does approve of what happened to the bad guys, and is okay with what he has done. Edmond Dantes was a hard working, honest, and friendly man. It was only until others changed his life completely for the worse, did he begin to seek vengeance on those who did him wrong. Not once did Dantes have any intentions of using his newfound wealth for any reasons not pertaining to getting even with Danglars, Villefort, and Fernand. In the end, he was successful in his quest for revenge. Yes, his style of revenge might have been more severe than what others would do, but only Dantes himself knows the suffering he wrongfully endured for the gain of others. Even though some of his actions sometimes damaged innocent people, his revenge was justified because he only did to his betrayers, what they did to him.
Revenge is a fairly strong emotion; it’s wanting to retaliate towards those who wronged you. Revenge is such an uncontrollable form of retaliation that it can result in a destructive outcome or be carried out successfully. Although the results may vary, revenge sums up to one thing which is pain of some sort, affecting both parties or just one. Throughout history, we see many tales of revenge and redemption. Often revenge does leave the one carrying it out feeling victorious, but this can suddenly change as the process of karma generally begins in some tales.
Dante and Virgil come across Filippo Argenti, a Guelph from Florence, and upon discovering his identity, they immediately treat him with great disdain and wish misery and harm upon him. Filippo is thought to be an enemy of Dante’s because he is from the opposing side in Florence and because his brother stole Dante’s possessions after he was exiled from the land. What this passage then poses is the question of whether Dante and Virgil are exhibiting righteous indignation or whether their wrath is unjustified. In other words, is it possible for anger to be legitimate or is it always wrong? Depending on how this instance is interpreted, the reader can either believes that they are justified in their vengeance or are committing the same sin they should be avoiding within the fifth circle of hell. Some may believe that their anger can be justified because of what Filippo did and who he was, since he was definitely not a very just man while living. They may come to the conclusion that Dante and Virgil did no wrong while harming Filippo and throwing him from the boat to be mauled because they had a reason for doing
	Edmond Dantes imprisonment made a huge impact on his life. He spent 14 years in the dark and quiet Chateau d’If. During those 14 years he met a priest, Abbe Faria, which they met each other through a secret tunnel in which they both have created while in prison. An amazing transformation takes place in Edmond Dantes as he learns about his enemies and a large hidden treasure that contains a large sum of money. Abbe Faria is a very smart man, while in prison he taught Dantes many useful knowledge including the whereabouts of a large treasure located on the Isle of Monte Cristo.
While getting inspiration for Monte Cristo, he heard a story about a man, which inspired the plot for his novel. Picaud, the man whom inspired the story, gained vengeance in a much more gruesome way than Dantes does. Picaud takes vengeance whereas Dantes is avenged. Justice is achieved because good is stronger than evil, not because of the Count’s power (Stowe 125). Perhaps this is Dumas’s opinion on vengeance. If it is well earned, then it will fall into the man’s hands rightfully (Maurois). Dumas’s inspiration for the novel also came from his personal life. His father was heavily mistreated, and as he watched helplessly for his whole childhood, it became important to him to avenge his father. Although people in his own life may not have wronged him as they did his father, he believes in revenge, and sought revenge through his literature (Maurois). Through the character of Edmond Dantes, Dumas portrayed his own desire to justify his father’s oppressors. In Maurois’s article, he speaks about this, saying, “He must have been sorely tempted to find compensation in fiction for the iniquities of the real world.” Perhaps he was afraid to vocalize his opinion publicly, so he decided on a more subtle route, which was to create a story that everyone could identify with. Writing Monte Cristo must have been closure for Dumas at the expense of his father. He sought vengeance in the form of literature
Seeing as this work was written by Dante, and the journey is taken by Dante, he has a unique opportunity to judge his fellow man and decide how they will be punished. He also gets to place his enemies in hell, forever besmirching their names for generations to remember. Perhaps unknowing to Dante, that is worse than any of the punishments that he placed his enemies in. The reality of The Inferno is unlikely and therefore these punishments are nothing but a fictiona...
Retribution – is a correctional aim which is to hold a person who has committed a crime accountable for committing a crime against another or society in the form of punishment. (Stojkovic and Lovell 2013) What we look at in retribution is when someone is punished there is legitimacy in the punishment of a particular crime that was committed. Some of the pros of retribution are retribution can make a person or society feel safer or a feeling of justice being served when a person is punished for the crime they committed. The con of retribution is during court proceedings the prosecution and the offender’s lawyer may come to a plea agreement which could give the offender a lesser sentence than what he or she would have gotten originally. (Stojkovic and Lovell 2013)
Revenge is one of the main drivers found in stories and in life. One of these stories is The Count of Monte Cristo. Edmond Dantes ultimately will have temporary satisfaction from enacting his revenge before he spirals into a depression he will never be able to come out of. Dantes would not feel remorse over his decision to enact his revenge. The men who destroyed Edmond Dantes’ life never got their just desserts, and in fact, it was quite the opposite.
At the beginning of the book, while Edmond was still Edmond Dantes, he work and pursued his career on a ship. The guy at which he worked for soon became in debt because his shipping business was going out of business. Edmond Dantes payed off this shipping guys debt under the name as Sinbad the Sailor. Edmond accomplished this mission under a different name so his former boss wouldn't know that Edmond Dantes was really the bill savior that Sinbad the Sailor has became. Edmond Dantes changed his identity to pursue, perhaps a fantasy. Edmond wanted to give back to those who gave to him. He changed his identity for the better. He changed it to help out instead of to destroy.
Revenge has been a popular means of righting a wrong or a perceived wrong over the course of history. Revenge defines the act of inflicting hurt or harm on someone for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands. The injury or wrong suffered at the hands of another person may be real or perceived, but the action in response, revenge, can be very real. The act of revenge may be viewed differently by different populations, some view it as necessary to maintain order in society, while others view it as barbaric. The opposing views on the place of revenge in society can be attributed to a difference of values in society.
“Those who plot the destruction of others often fall themselves” (Phaedrus). This quote was said by a Roman fabulist and it depicts the entire concept of revenge in Hamlet. The nature of revenge causes someone to act upon anger rather than reason. Hamlet takes place in Denmark and is about Hamlet’s uncle who kills his dad to gain power of Denmark. After the killing, Hamlet seeks revenge on his uncle. In the play, there are several characters wanting vengeance like that of Hamlet. Throughout the play, Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras all had a tragic death of a family member which caused their decision for revenge. Consequentially, these revenges caused the demise of two characters and the rise of power of another. The retaliation shown by the Prince of Denmark, as well as Laertes led to the downfall of their government.
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
Taking revenge is a bitter sweet thing. I have always thought that people should always get what they desire, whether it be a grade, a smile and hug or in some cases, revenge. When I was in high school there seemed to be someone always trying to get me in trouble, they would say things that wouldn’t be true or do things to make me look bad. The fact that I never seemed to do anything to them would make me mad and wonder what I could do to get them back. Revenge would usually come in some sort of verbal put down or I would try to physically hurt them. It always seemed when I would get the revenge right away I would feel really good but as I thought about what I did, and what they did to me I would always feel guilty or wish I would have never done anything to them in return.
“With God as my witness, I have been falsely accused of these crimes. I did not commit them. I am an innocent man, and I just pray in the name of Jesus Christ that all this will be brought out. The truth will eventually be brought out.” That is a direct quote from Calvin C. Johnson Jr. that he said in 1983, at his sentence hearing (Hamikian). The death penalty is slowly depleting from countries and more than two-thirds of countries have stopped using is it as a form of punishment (Dying Out). Thirty five percent of Americans oppose the death penalty, which is the highest number in forty years. That percentage needs to be higher and the death penalty should be eliminated. (Strauss). It should not even be an option as a form of punishment. More citizens should see that having the death penalty has a more negative than positive outcome (Douthat). The death penalty should be done away with; many innocent people are on death row, states with the death penalty have a higher murder rate, and it is a more expensive alternative.
My personal experience with revenge isn’t much, and it concerns little things. Revenge can simply be when a person draws on your book, and in spite you would draw on their book as well. It might as well occur in a game, for example my friend plays a lot of game online and this game is to simply ‘kill’ other opponents. Once, her character got attacked by another opponent but she was not prepared for the attack and she lost. Because of this, she was angry and wanted to seek revenge. She then got all her other friends to ‘gang’ up and attack the opponent. Since it wasn’t a very fair battle, the opponent lost. This act might seem childish and trivial, but this is the act of revenge.
Revenge’s Successful Implementation in Dumas’s The Count of Monte Cristo In order to discuss the merit of a revenge, effective revenge must be defined. Fruitful vengeance must have completed objectives, acclimate to obstacles and challenges that occur, provide the avenger with closure, and the transgressor with understanding. The Count of Monte Cristo’s rebuttal is based on his precise design, has equal punishments for every party, ensures that everyone who wronged him comprehends his motivation, adapts to incidents, and gives the Count the opportunity justify his actions, making his revenge a successful one.