Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in world religions
Gender roles in society through religion
Gender roles in society through religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in world religions
In Judith Butler’s Undoing Gender, she examines normative conceptions of sexuality and gender, in doing so she also suggests that those conceptions can then be undone. Butler’s undoing is an ethic argument that attempts to appeal to the conscience of the reader. With this understanding can Butler’s undoing hold up when argued within a religious context? To better contextualize undoing in religion it is Mary Daly’s The Church and the Second Sex that may offer some clarity. Ultimately, it is the intention of this paper to explore undoing gender within religion.
Gender within the framework of Butler’s work is essentially independent of biological sex and is recognized as an act of doing. This doing is the performance of these gender roles (Butler, 2). Gender dictates that value must be placed on one’s ability to adhere to predetermined roles. For a gendered society to function there must be a hierarchical structure based on one’s ability to maintain and perform prescribed gender roles. Those who fit the gender mold retain their full humanity while those who do not become less human.
Fear of displacement in the hierarchy, gender roles leave humans desiring recognition of their stability in their gender role and as a legitimate social being. Those whose chosen gender roles or sexuality leave them outside the gender binary are considered less than human. Being deprived of one’s humanity along with the deprivation of recognition makes life “unlivable” as Butler puts it. “…Without some recognizability I cannot live. But I may also feel that the terms by which I am recognized make life unlivable.” (Butler, 4)
Mary Daly, a feminist philosopher and Catholic theologian writes The Church and the Second Sex as a critique of the Catholic Churc...
... middle of paper ...
...x in 1968 decades before Butler’s Undoing Gender. The Church and the Second Sex is written in the midst of the reemergence of the feminist movement. Still relatively early in her career Daly considers herself—at that time—a Christian feminist or one who criticizes the Church from within the faith.
The Church and the Second Sex when supplemented with Butler’s contemporary language in Undoing Gender allows for Daly’s ideas to be helpful in current gender politics. Butler’s undoing can in turn, can be understood within the context of religion.
Daly essentially rejects many of the same Christian feminist beliefs that once guided her work. However, Daly’s arc from Christian feminism to a more radical feminism that in essence deems Christianity as irredeemably sexist, does not deduct from its usefulness as a tool in which one can contextualize Butler’s undoing of gender
Different from Woods' 1950s view of femininity, Charles Huchet's 1981 article compares Marie's lais to other works of the times. He suggests feminism is not present...
The ‘Good Christian Award’ recognises outstanding works in a religious context. The Golding Sisters (Isabelle Therese, Annie Mackenzie and Kate Dwyer) are worthy of such recognition based on their brave plight for social justice and equality for women at the turn of the 20th century. These women founded various organisations and used public speaking skills, firsthand understanding of women’s needs and Catholic social teaching principles to sway opinions of those who didn’t support women’s equality. Evidence of their work is still evident today with women in Australia enjoying equality in society, freedom of speech, equal pay and vocations.
Caroline Walker Bynum raised several thought-provoking claims in her book Holy Feast and Holy Fast, but her main argument of the mindset of medieval women with regards to their status in society was the most intriguing. Rather than simply agreeing with most traditional medievalists, she analyzes the male/female difference in terms of which symbols each gender used, and how these symbols tied in to their distinct religious concerns. She maintains that women accepted their place in society and religion, and instead of succumbing to the misogyny, they used their association with the flesh and humanness to connect themselves to the humanity of God. Her arguments regarding medieval women and their practices also implies that she is accepting of the idea of gender as a valuable category of historical analysis.
Gender Trouble published in 1990 by Judith Butler, argues that feminism was and still relaying on the presumption that ‘women’ a...
Ruether, Rosemary Radford. "Anthropology: Humanity as Male and Female" in Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology. Beacon Press, 1993, pp. 93-115.
In Devor’s article, “Becoming Members of Society: Learning the social Meanings of Gender” one can better understand how society has a big impact on how gender is perceived. Understanding
Religion and spirituality reach into the depths of the human psyche and strongly influence a nation’s way of life. In Margaret Cavendish’s “Blazing World”, the Emperor and the inhabitants of the Blazing World worship Margaret, who renamed herself Margaret the First. Highly revered as a deity by the people, Margaret is surprised to discover that females do not have a high place in the religious fabric of the Blazing World. Women are barred from religious assemblies, because it is “promiscuous” for men and women to be together during religious worship, so women must remain at home to worship in the privacy of their rooms (Cavendish 1767). Priests and governors are made eunuchs to safeguard them from women and children who, according to Margaret’s advisors, make too much disturbances in the church and in the state. In Sir Thomas More’s Utopia, women priests are highly regarded. However, churches here are also segregated – the men sit on one side and while the women sit on the other.
Ramshaw G, The Gender of God, In, Loades A, (Ed), Feminist Theology, A Reader, SPCK, London, 1990
Stereotypes have become a socially accepted phenomena in today’s society. So socially acceptable, in fact, they have made it onto advertising billboards and into our daily language. We do not think twice as they pass our tongues, and we do tilt our heads in concern or questioning as they pass into our ears. In Judith Butler’s essay “Besides Oneself: On the Limits of Sexual Autonomy”, stereotypes are exposed and explored. Especially stereotypes pertaining to sexual orientation. Butler explains how stereotypes are unacceptable. She does this in a way which allows her to concurrently explore what it means to be human, and also what humans do or need to make Earth a livable place for ourselves. When examining Butler’s essay, one could say, and
“What makes for a livable world?”, and what constitutes the human?”, are two questions Judith Butler inquires in her opening paragraph and throughout her writing that determine the mindsets of individuals throughout our society. Both of these arguments are answered differently, by different persons, within different cultures, yet play a dramatic role in Butler’s view of herself, the LGBT community, and most of all, every other human
In this article, Shaw and Lee describe how the action of labels on being “feminine” or “masculine” affect society. Shaw and Lee describe how gender is, “the social organization of sexual difference” (124). In biology gender is what sex a person is and in culture gender is how a person should act and portray themselves. They mention how gender is what we were taught to do in our daily lives from a young age so that it can become natural(Shaw, Lee 126). They speak on the process of gender socialization that teaches us how to act and think in accordance to what sex a person is. Shaw and Lee state that many people identify themselves as being transgendered, which involves a person, “resisting the social construction of gender into two distinct, categories, masculinity and femininity and working to break down these constraining and polarized categories” ( 129). They write about how in mainstream America masculinity and femininity are described with the masculine trait being the more dominant of the two. They define how this contributes to putting a higher value of one gender over the other gender called gender ranking (Shaw, Lee 137). They also speak about how in order for femininity to be viewed that other systems of inequality also need to be looked at first(Shaw,Lee 139).
Russell, L. M. (1985). ‘Authority and the Challenge of Feminist Interpretation’. In: Russell, L. (ed.). Feminist Interpretation of the Bible. Oxford. Basil Blackwell. pp.137-146.
In the challenge to classify and distinguish the sex, gender and gender preference, Judith Butler `s theory about perforsmative acts in her Performative Acts and Gender Consititution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory is very important for us to understand queer. She purposed, the acts of homosexual, bisexual or heterosexual are not a settled identity; it is an act that is constantly changing like a actor. In her opinion, there is no real gender in this society. Gender is a substructure for repetitive act that is histrionic.
I believe that this is an accurate depiction of Butler’s argument about gender in brief. This quote essentially sums up her whole idea on gender and what she believes it
Throughout her entire discourse of feminist critique, Butler identifies certain problems and attributes reasons for the continuing subjugation of the `subject'. Initially Butler's predominant issue is the concept of `gender' and identity. The concept of Descartes `core identity' does not seem to work for Butler. Inspired by Foucault and Nietzche, Butler follows in the theory of "there is no doe...