helllo

907 Words2 Pages

Text 1 is an excerpt from Sonia Nazario’s book, titled “Enrique’s Journey” that serves the cultural context of Mexican immigrants who are mothers, who left their children to earn money from the city. The narrative text is targeted to individuals who are blessed with a good quality of life. Text 2 is “In Trek North, First Lure is Mexico’s Other Line”, an article by Randal C. Archibold with accompanying photographs by Rodrigo Cruz, published in The New York Times in April 6, 2013. Similarly, it serves the cultural context of determined workingwomen, intended for the American audience, specifically New Yorkers. Although both texts excludes the cultural context of men, but highly considers women, this social group is depicted differently; in the excerpt, women are represented as an inspiring, heroic character, which enables the audience to easily empathize with their struggles, whereas the article, with its intended purpose to inform the audience of the doubling number of illegal crossers, portrays women as a short-sighted romantic.
Emotive language is used in text 1 to evoke the audience’s sympathy and pity towards Lourdes, the central female character, for what she has been through. Nazario’s portrayal of the affectionate relationship shared between Lourdes and his son, Enrique embodies motherly love, which audiences with a cultural context of a mother can easily relate and imagine the pain of being separated from their children. Without Lourdes, Enrique is “so shy it is crushing”. This appeals to the audience’s pathos as it explains her source of guilt and resentment to leave home. Additionally, Enrique seems to long for Lourdes’ attention. He “pursed his lips” to kiss her and clings “to her pant leg.” His attachment to Lourdes hi...

... middle of paper ...

...entially triggers negative responses for the cultural context of women as the article focuses more on facts and presented them with less appreciation. The lexis and diction of text 1 is more impactful in terms of its audience response as many cultural contexts are able to relate to Lourdes and Elvira’s feelings through their experience
In conclusion, through the different use of language and imagery, female immigrants or women as a social group, is praised for their strength in the excerpt, but they are regarded as rather insensible in the article since it primarily concentrates on facts, which reveals the theme of both texts, a dilemma between sacrificing their morality or being their children’s savior. Text 1 represents a migrant’s perspective that deals with emotions, while text 2 is impartial and possibly interpreted as ignorant of the character’s context.

Open Document