Patients are ultimately responsible for their own health and wellbeing and should be held responsible for the consequences of their decisions and actions. All people have the right to refuse treatment even where refusal may result in harm to themselves or in their own death and providers are legally bound to respect their decision. If patients cannot decide for themselves, but have previously decided to refuse treatment while still competent, their decision is legally binding. Where a patient's views are not known, the doctor has a responsibility to make a decision, but should consult other healthcare professionals and people close to the patient. It is important that people are in control of what happens to them while under the care of their doctor, especially if they're alert and aware.
The principle of autonomy states, that an individual’s decision must be respected in all cases, also an individual can act freely in accordance to their plan. For example, in a case where a patient and family demands to continue medical or surgical care and a physician want the patient to stop further treatment. In this case the patient’s choice will matter the most. According to the principle of autonomy it will be the patients and family choice whether to continue or discontinue treatment. The principle of beneficence which states, “one must promote good” comes into play in this case.
Let our superiors know what is going on and ask for advice when we need to. This would show that we are honest. When we come into contact with patients they rely on us to do the right thing and always perform our job with integrity. Often people’s lives are in our hands. We have to care about the patient and care about our job in order to continue to provide quality care.
In healthcare today, confidentiality is persistently addressed because of the importance of the privacy of a patient. LOOK IN THE BOOK. Another value in which the Hippocratic oath addresses would be fairness. As said in the oath, “whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice” (CITATION). It should be implemented in to the standards of every hospital procedure in the contemporary medical ... ... middle of paper ... ...ard from a philosophical standpoint.
They ought to practice medication painstakingly and honestly and, when beneficence is unthinkable, they ought to still attempt to minimize hurts. Restrictions on premature birth and killing doubtlessly come from this worry; 3. Honor: doctors ought to act decently. They ought to approach their patients with deference, and ought not enter into questionable relations with them; and 4. Confidentiality: doctors ought to support the confidences of their patients and not reveal data unnecessarily.
Having respect is the basic essential of treating people ethically and meeting the complete needs of patients and their families across the continuum of care. Yet, the key component from the staffing levels of the medical professionals is to keep the patients best interest at heart and in mind. On the other hand, there will always be those who stand up for the morally right thing; but you will also have some that will try to go against the rules and regulations and do their own medical
A medical practitioner should always have the expectation not to incur more harm on the patient. A patient comes to the hospital for a solution to their problem and should not go back home with more problems. Patient safety includes interpreting results accurately, doing the right test and following
Commitment to honesty with patients is another essential role of all physicians. Physicians must make sure that patients are completely and honestly informed before the treatment and after it has occurred. This means that patients should not be involved in every minute decisions regarding their medical care, but be supported to decide on the course of therapy. Whenever patients are injured as a result of medical care, patients should be notified rapidly, because failure to report this could seriously compromise patient and societal trust. Reporting and analyzing medical mal-practice provides the basis for appropriate prevention and improveme... ... middle of paper ... .... For example, physicians who specialize in cardiology will see an increased rate in job opportunities.
Something done with great thought and care. It would be a last-resort option only if the mentally competent patient requests, and if all other last resort options have failed. As healthcare providers, we have a moral and ethical duty to advocate for our patients. Often this means putting our own views and judgments aside and ensuring that the patient's wishes are complied with. In this case, it simply means that the patient would be allowed to spend their final days without needless worry, and die with pride and dignity.
Also, the reasons for deception must be to prevent psychological distress, and its execution must have a high chance of success so that the patient-doctor relationship will not suffer from a break in trust. Overall, doctors should always strive to respect autonomy and provide beneficence when interacting with their patients. However, the majority of the time benevolent deception is used the p... ... middle of paper ... ...cal practice. Overall, physicians should not assume what they believe is best for their patients and should be truthful in relaying news about medical conditions, even though the diagnoses may be grave. Though the situation may look bleak, doctors need to take up the responsibility to be honest with their patients in order to honor the principle of respect for autonomy, and yet be beneficent by presenting a sense of realistic hope that treatment will succeed so that they will not easily give up on their chance of living.