Zezus versus Agamemnon

650 Words2 Pages

Zeus and Agamemnon are both very authoritative figures, but what really separates the two and their styles of rule (ruling/ control/ choose another word.) is Zeus’ ability to consult and reason with others. Zeus rarely makes major decisions without consulting the other Olympian Gods and without the consideration of their feelings and opinions, while Agamemnon believes he has the right to do whatever he pleases and generally disregards the opinions of others, regardless of their status.( THIS IS A LIL TO LONG) Zeus’ respect (proper english/ The respect Zeus' displays) for his fellow Olympians is very much what separates him from Agamemnon, who acts is(weird phrasing) self interest a vast majority of the time. Agamemnon makes it clear to those around him that he is of higher status and therefore his words and actions should be honoured and valued greater to any inferior to him.
(YOU NEED TRANSITION WORDS LIKE, IN ADDITION, ALSO, MOREOVER, THUS, HOWEVER, ON THE OTHER HAND, FORTUNATLEY, I probually have to many in mine but you need some in yours just a lil)
As respective leaders of their societies, Zeus and Agamemnon are often put in positions of making critical decisions that affect more than the likes of themselves. Zeus who although may act in self-interest some of time, generally makes decisions of justice and fairness that overall satisfy his fellow Olympians. (Book 20. 22-32; pg. 426-427) Zeus respects his fellow Olympians and holds a fair level of value to their feelings and opinions. When Zeus had known the fate of (his) son Sarpadon he very much struggled with the decision whether or not he should intervene to save(d) his son’s life, (you could put a period an then say On the other hand, after consulting …. its a lil long)...

... middle of paper ...

...r of Olympians (Athena, Apollo, Ares, Aphrodite, etc.) intervened with the Trojan War, that was angered Zeus and called forth a council of Olympians, heeding that all gods and goddesses stop interfering with the Trojan War and those that disobey him shall be sent to the pits of Tartarus. (Book 8, pg. 200-201)

Agamemnon also uses bribery as a secondary incentive, when punishment cannot be effective in achieving his task. Evident in book 9, as he offers many gifts to Achilles in return that Achilles subside his anger and rejoin battle along side of the Achaeans. Zeus doesn’t try to bribe the other Olympians, but instead respects and consults with them and appeals to their sense of justice and reason. This ultimately is what sets Zeus and his style of rule apart from Agamemnon, who doesn’t look to others for council or help when making major decisions, unlike Zeus.

Open Document