Zero Risk Theory Of Trait Driver Aggression

Physical Conditions
“Error is part of the human condition”. While errors by road users trigger crashes, the environment in which these take place should no be ignored - - road layout – indirect influences – nature of the vehicle – traffic laws, enforcement or ack thereof (Hijar)
It has been established that there is a greater risk for collisions in adverse weather conditions such as rain, snow, and fog. Many drivers try to compensate for these conditions by driving more carefully and increasing distance between vehicles, which is in line with zero risk theory proposed by Naatanen and Summala (as cited by Hennessey, 2011). Zero risk theory asserts that drivers adapt to risk to the point where subjective risk is almost zero. Although individuals

The harm is seen as intentional. Trait aggression is predicted by various personal, social, cognitive, and environmental factors. While not meeting the criteria for trait aggression, some individuals demonstrate a “trait”-like disposition toward frequent, extreme acts of aggression. From this perspective, some drivers may develop trait aggression tendencies, which is a unique personal quality differing from those who seek to take risks or gain excitement from driving. Trait driver aggression appears to involve a heightened tendency to misperceive actions and intentions of other drivers as hostile and threatening, and to become frustrated by the actions of others (Hennessy, 2011). Aggressive driving, risky driving, and minor losses of vehicle control were predicted by driving anger (12121212). Researchers found that sensation seeking predicted aggressive driving, losses of concerntrationwhil edriving ,moving citations, minor and major accidents (2323). It was found that openness predicted risky driving and agreeables predicted losses of vehicular control; findings are consistent with previous studies. Emotional stability predicted aggressive driving while conscientiousness and extraversion did not predict