Women's Wage Gap Analysis

552 Words2 Pages

Women and men for the most part have reached complete equality, but it hasn’t always been this way. In the past women weren’t treated as full citizens, by not having complete rights, limited amount of jobs, and hardly a say in anything. Today women have the same opportunities as men such as in, education, jobs, and full voting rights. Although all these rights have only been intact until just recently, women have only had a say in choosing a president for just a little under a century. In the past, women were expected to stay home and take care of the family while the men were at work. This was the expectation for women for centuries. However, that is no longer the case. Even with a large percentage of women at work, a wage a gap is prevalent. Although the wage gap has nothing to do with being sexist its just that women have a more passionate side to them, which makes them better teachers nurses, and …show more content…

This wasn’t always the case in the Supreme Court case, Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp (source E), Mrs. Ida Phillips believed she was denied a job due to her gender. According to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 it states, “an employer may not, in the absence of business necessity, refuse to hire women with pre-school-age children while hiring men with such children.” As for other terms not having full equal rights may not be a bad thing. According to the article, “The Fraud of The Equal Rights Amendment” (source D) discusses the fact that receiving full equal rights for women will cause them to lose child support, alimony, and qualify for the draft. In the source, Phyllis Schlafly concludes with the statement “Under present American laws, the man is always required to support his wife and each child he caused to be brought into the world. Why should women abandon these good laws…?” Are these good laws or just enabling women to not be capable of full

Open Document