William Goulding Lord Of The Flies Analysis

487 Words1 Page

In William Gouldings’ story “Lord of The Flies” he presents multiple examples of mankind being naturally evil. Notably, he mentions, in chapter 7, that Jack and his hunters were playing a game. This game was not your ordinary young boy game, the game was vaguely dark, considering they were all young boys. This so called game involved chanting and pretending to murder one of their friends, as if the friend was one of the wild pigs. Along with that, Goulding begins to darken it up even further, Jack has his boys tie up and beat another friend of theirs. Ultimately, the boys and Jack end up attempting to actually murder two of their supposedly friends. First off, to explain the game that Goudling had mentioned in the story, all of …show more content…

Jack and his hunters go on a hunt, but not after the pigs, this time it was after PIggy and Ralph. The boys were out for the kill, and all because they didn’t like Piggy and Ralph. Typically if you were to not like someone you just blow it off and avoid them, not for these boys after being stranded on the island for so long, it had driven them mad and the true evil came out of them. They partially succeeded in their murderous intentions. They killed piggy by crushing him with a boulder and before they could reach Ralph, he had made it to the beach where rescue awaited him.

The conclusion of this is to prove William Goudling’ opinion that mankind is genuinely evil. I believe, all three points starting from dark proceeding to the more gory events of the story have been very persuading to his opinion. The beatings with no reasoning, the dark game they played and lastly the killing. William Goudlings” story “Lord of the Flies” is a strong persuasive story on how evil mankind can be, even at such a young

Open Document