William Golding's Lord Of The Flies Character Analysis

673 Words2 Pages

The book Lord of the Flies Jack the leader of the savages wasn't always bad. William Goldberg the author says that everyone is capable of becoming evil, where philosophers like Jean- Jacques Rousseau who implied that it was our environment that shapes us. While Golding has some good points on his theory I have to agree With Rousseau because of many of his beliefs. In rousseau’s point he says that the environment changes people’s way in if they became evil and I believe this is true from statistics from cities crime rates. In Detroit, they have had the one of the us highest crime rate for many years in a row with “2072 violent crimes per 100000 people in 2015”(Crime in America 2015: 1). So if people's environment does not affect them then why have Detroit's crime rates not gone down yet? Its because there environment effects and changes their actions. Another example is the city of Irvine, California, it is the same case that is going on with Detroit. They have been one of the safest cities for a long time now with only “48 crimes per 100,000 people in 2015”(Hess 4), and it is because of the good environment around there that keeps there people in line and not committing crimes. These …show more content…

Rodger who was a good kid at first but then he realized there was no adults around so he started to do some not smart things. For example he was throwing rocks at Henry because he knew he would not get in trouble from no adults being there,even though he was not hitting henry with a 6ft radius safe zone. He also was the one who pulled the lever to the rock which would hit and kill piggy “with the sense of delirious abandonment” (Golding 180) . This is a prime example of how environments influence people because the book implies that he would not normally do dumb things like kill an innocent person but in the environment with no consequences he changed and the environment changed

Open Document