In a capitalistic globalized society that we live in today, there is a large gap between those who have and those who have not. This can pertain to resources, political stability and wealth. The capitalistic or neo-liberalistic system that our society practices allows our society to have a free trade market; where competition is supposed to produce equal opportunity for both the rich and the poor (which is obviously not the case), letting corporations pursue whatever economic advantage they seek to gain without government interference, and the emphasis on individual responsibility rather than the concept of public goods and community. Once these elements are incorporated into the society, the gap continues to widen.
Therefore, the current economic system has failed because there is an unequal distribution of wealth that causes a portion of the global society to become underdeveloped and poor. As a result, these underdeveloped societies struggles and continues to struggle in the depths of poverty, while the societies that are considered “developed,” enjoy the excessive luxuries of wealth that is not necessarily needed. This unequal distribution leaves these underdeveloped societies at the mercy of wealthier societies to exploit their resources and their people, for the sake of profit.
These exploitations include: human trafficking; causing child as well as forced labor in impoverished countries to benefit companies in their production in exchange for cheap labor, harming the environment through the exploitation of natural resources such as crude and natural gasses for the sake of producing material goods, and the formation of monopolies and oligopolies that uses cheap labor abroad and no longer uses domestic labor leaving the na...
... middle of paper ...
...
Works Cited
Caporaso, James A., and David P. Levine. Theories of Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge
UP, 1992. Print.
Daly, Herman E., John B. Cobb, and Clifford W. Cobb. For the Common Good: Redirecting the
Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston:
Beacon, 1989. Print.
Lindblom, Charles Edward. Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic Systems. New
York: Basic, 1977. Print.
Marx, Karl. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications,
2007. Print.
Schumacher, E. F. Small Is Beautiful; Economics as If People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row,
1973. Print.
Smith, Adam, and Edwin Cannan. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,.
London: Methuen &, 1904. Print.
Smith, Adam. "The Theory of Moral Sentiments." Yumpu.com. July 2010. Web. 12 Dec. 2013.
In the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,
At one point in time poverty was the general fact of the world. Man was always expected to live on the line of poverty, majority of the economic thinkers couldn’t see the world moving away from this standard but we did and have gained great affluence. As society has grown from this poverty stricken state it once was in, into an affluent one, the ideas used to run it have yet to change in some ways. In The Affluent Society, John Kenneth Galbraith explains how with great economic growth there should be growth in economic ideas as well.
Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (London: 1776), 190-91, 235-37.
Capitalism, as a system is bound to increase economic disparity. Bill Gates argues that this system would make huge progress in terms of reducing the divide between the rich and the poor (1). However, capitalism would cause disparity not only within a country but also between different countries. A free market would ensure an increase in inequality because the wages of the working class never increase proportionate to the economic growth. This happens because of “inflation, rapid economic growth, the decline in the power of unions and their influence as well as the exchange rate of the dollar” (Thompson). The owners of companies always get the benefits whereas the labor receives very little for the work it has put into the products (Hanks). In terms of disparity between countries, capitalism, while proposing free trade, emphasizes the need for specialization. This specialization increases the divide between the first world and third world. The third world consists of countries which specialize in the primary industry whereas the first world concentrates on the secondary industry. The seco...
Smith's Influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who bases it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was...
________. 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. [1776]
Smith, Adam. "CHAPTER XI OF THE RENT OF LAND." An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1976. 161. Print.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [electronic resource]. Dublin: printed for Messrs. Whitestone, Chamberlaine, W. Watson, Potts, S. Watson and 15 others in Dublin.
We look in particular to the case of the United States. The US is the world’s leading power and hegemon, who also has the world’s highest GDP and GDP per capita. However, in recent years the gap between the rich and the poor has been growing at a fast pace. This prevalence of income inequality in a free market society like the US indicates that inequality is a direct result of a market or government failure. In a free market it is believed that individuals possess an equal opportunity to be successfully, but because of misallocation of resources in a market economy this is not possible.
The division of labour described by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations is a product of individual self-interest. This is representative of Smith’s methodological individualist interpretations of human nature. Adam Smith deduces that the division of labour is beneficial to the individual, as it is in one’s own interest to work less whilst still engaging in tasks that are to their own specialities. Highly specialized work is beneficial for nations to grow economically whilst allowing individuals to further pursue their own rational self-interest. To further explain the concepts that Smith proposes I will first explain what rational self-interest in regards to human nature and how the division of labour emerges from self-interest. Secondly, I
The 2008 documentary The End of Poverty? is a film that focuses around global poverty and how it became the tragedy that it is today. Poverty was created by acts of military conquest, slavery and colonization that led to the confiscation of individual’s property and forced labor. However, today the problem remains because wealthy countries who take advantage of developing third world countries. The film interviews several activists who discuss how the issues became and several ways in which they could be eliminated, as well as interviews from individuals who are experiencing it firsthand.
The unequal distribution of wealth is seen as a negative and ongoing problem and debate within American politics and society. There is a great deal of evidence to back up why wealth distribution is damaging the American ideals of life. It also carries inevitable and undetermined consequences for our nation. How resources are distributed within a country depends on where the resources were found. For example, numerous people will move to an area that is rich with resources in order in ensure job security. Just because a country is fruitful in a resource does not mean that that particular country is wealthy. In fact, the laborers are paid very minimal...
The pivotal second chapter of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, "Of the Principle which gives occasion to the Division of Labour," opens with the oft-cited claim that the foundation of modern political economy is the human "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another."1 This formulation plays both an analytical and normative role. It offers an anthropological microfoundation for Smith's understanding of how modern commercial societies function as social organizations, which, in turn, provide a venue for the expression and operation of these human proclivities. Together with the equally famous concept of the invisible hand, this sentence defines the central axis of a new science of political economy designed to come to terms with the emergence of a novel object of investigation: economic production and exchange as a distinct, separate, independent sphere of human action. Moreover, it is this domain, the source of wealth, which had become the main organizational principle of modern societies, displacing the once-ascendant positions of theology, morality, and political philosophy.
Why nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, is a captivating read for all college economic courses. Coauthored by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, they optimistically attempt to answer the tough question of why some nations are rich and others are poor through political economic theories. They lay it all out in the preface and first chapter. According to Acemoglu and Robinson, the everyday United States citizen obtains more wealth than the every day Mexican, sub-Saharan African, Ethiopian, Mali, Sierra Leonne and Peruvian citizen as well as some Asian countries. The authors strategically arranged each chapter in a way that the reader, whomever he or she is, could easily grasp the following concept. Extractive nations that have political leadership and financial inconsistencies within their institutions are the largest contributor to poverty and despair within most countries. It also states that countries with socioeconomic institutions that work ‘for the people and by the people’, or in other words, focus on the internal agenda of that
The disparity between the poor and the wealthy is substantial. There is an obvious gap between the social class of the rich and poor in capitalism. Wealth is earned and no one is given