Why Should Professional Athletes Be Role Models

406 Words1 Page

For decades we've debated the merits of whether or not we should consider professional athletes to be role models. The debate is really unavoidable; it's thrust upon us - and upon the professional athletes - for one simple reason: our kids just happen to idolize, emulate and identify with these popular characters more so than any other group of people.

In 1993 Charles Barkley - then one of the highest profile stars of the NBA - attempted to settle the debate in a Nike commercial when he declared, "I'm not a role model." He further clarified his stance in the ad by explaining that only "parents should be role models," and that just because he got millions of dollars for dunking a basketball, doesn't mean he should play some sort of surrogate parent role and raise other people's children. Of course, I'm not really sure any of us were expecting him to.

In retrospect, it's hard to decipher just exactly what Barkley was trying to achieve with this message, although we're a bit more clear on Nike's motive: they were just trying to …show more content…

And it stands to reason that children, whose brains are still developing through age 25, are in the most vulnerable position of being influenced, one way or another. So Barkley was right in one sense; the modeling behaviors of parents, teachers, coaches and - later on in life - bosses and mentors - are absolutely paramount in influencing the behaviors of children, students and subordinates. But whether Barkley likes it or not, knows it or not, or even intends it or not, he and other professional athletes' behaviors - good or bad - will indeed serve as modeling for millions of people; most of them kids. That's just the way it is. And in the case of a recent episode involving a 28-year-old professional baseball player, that's not such a bad thing for the rest of

More about Why Should Professional Athletes Be Role Models

Open Document