More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative effects of language change
Positive and negative effects of language change
Positive and negative effects of language change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative effects of language change
In his essay, “Why Good English Is Good For You,” John Simon argues that speaking and writing English correctly is obligatory; the author suggests that he acknowledges the fact that language is constantly evolving, but Simon still believes that one should always use the correct “framework of accepted grammar,” while still “producing a style that is his very own” (31). Simon suggests that the argument that it is acceptable to use incorrect English since language is always changing is merely “an imperfect excuse for bad usage” (29). According to Simon, people must acquire a good sense of discipline in order to speak and write correctly, and he claims that discipline “gives us the pleasure of hearing or seeing our words” used in the correct
states that writing can only be improved through reading. In others words, the relations between
1. The main point Kirk Johnson, writer of “Today’s Kids Are, Like, Killing the English Language” published by the New York Times, illustrates is a shift in the way society nowadays communicates and expresses themselves with the emergence of technology and other forms of media in this new era compared to the precedent and placid century.
Since it’s been a predominant topic of our discussion, let us talk about the infamous English language. We can be sure that it has painstakingly progressed throughout generations of reevaluation and modernization, and has thus become what it is today. It has gone in several directions to try and mesh with the various epochs of language, from the Shakespearean era to the common English slang we use now, we can all agree that English is a language that has been transcending and will continue to transcend into many
There are many aspects for my mind to conceive while reading the articles why I write by George Orwell and Joan Didion. There are many different factors in triggering an author’s imagination to come up with what they want to write, and why they want to write it. In most writings a purpose is not found before the writer writes, but often found after they decide to start writing.
Simon emphases the significance of knowing, and using proper English, as well as keeping it alive. He proposes ways to sharpen the brain, which will result in a greater sense of discipline and memory. Simon also notes that everything we do is done with words, therefore, English is viewed as an essential to everyday life. The accurate use of rhetorical devices in this article are just one of many examples on how good English can help a person on a day to day basis. Despite Simon’s knowledge of proper English, the remainder of Americans must train themselves so that they may also achieve correct usage of the English
Is it possible to make vital life changes to become a better person at heart? Who’s the one that can help you? The only person that will get you up on your feet is yourself, and you have to believe deeply to make those changes. In this essay there are many main points that are being brought across to explain the problems and wisdom that arose from Baca’s life as an inmate. It talks about how he was grown up into an adult and the tragedies that he had to face in order to become one. Later I fallow steps that lead to the purpose and rhetorical appeals of Baca’s essay. The purpose dealt with the cause and effect piece and problem/ solution structure.
This freedom has created the English we speak today. Although a little behind the times, Oxford changes the rules as to what is correct English due to what is being spoken. In English Belongs to Everybody, Robert MacNeil, feels that English has prospered and grown because it was able to accept and absorb change (140). So change in the English language helps it grow, yet the dialect of the inner city blacks in our country is looked upon as a problem. To those in charge, there is no more room for growth.
Bagno asserts that if the grammar books do not account the innovative forms in them, the problem is entirely theirs not the populations. If purists chose to continue speaking in the traditional way, it is their right. Nobody is obliged to adopt innovations. “All we ask is that the other forms are also considerate correct”. (BAGNO, 2009).
Any craftsman knows that you need the right tools to complete a project successfully. Similarly, people need the right language and usage to communicate in a positive way. How people write is often a problem because they don’t have the right tools, but a bigger problem occurs when a writer “is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything at all” (592). If a writer carries this mentality, why try to communicate in the first place? People need...
The English language is absolutely insane. With all the tiny rules and idiosyncrasies, mistakes are bound to be made by someone speaking and or writing in the language. These are the tiny rules that could make someone pull their hair out in frustration, the tiny rules that could plunge someone into the infinite realm of insanity. There are people who think that English should be spoken correctly or not at all (generally punishable by genocide). There are people who think that the other group is a sad bunch of nerds who need a life. Which group is correct here? Certainly not the grammar fascists of the Third Reich variety, but the latter just sounds like a bunch of uneducated swine. To answer the question, another question needs to be posed. Is there a correct way to speak?
In Johnson’s preface to A Dictionary of the English Language, Johnson argues the importance of preserving language. Other dialects had a produced their own dictionaries, such as the French and Italians. Various writers of the eighteenth century were alarmed at the fact that there was no standard for the English language, since there was no standard it could easily become extinct. Johnson explored many points, such as how and why languages change as well as how many words are formed.
Sharma, B., 2008. “World Englishes, English as a Lingua Franca, and English Pedagogy”, Journal of NELTA 13 (2), pp. 121-130. Available from
English is a universal language is the common phenomenon appeared in the thousands of newspapers and magazines in the recent years. “‘English Rules’ is an actual example, presenting to the world an uncomplicated scenario suggesting the universality of the language’s spread and the likelihood of its continuation .” Through this one can understand that the English language is one of the most extensive and expensive languages in the world.It becomes a journalistic language in which striking words can be used to tell a story with vivid details. In English for Journalists, Wynford Hicks writes that the best advice to a journalist is : “write for your reader. You should use a clear form of English, avoiding jargon, slang, pomposity, academic complexity, obscurity…”
Max Anders says, "Only the disciplined ever get really good at anything." Everything in life requires some sort of discipline. Whether it is hitting a baseball, climbing a mountain, playing a musical instrument, making good grades or brushing your teeth it all comes down to a matter of discipline.
...oned above, the Internet is not a mere technological revolution but also socio-historical revolutions. The characteristics of the Internet activity lies in interactivity among users with the use of language, mainly English, which brought the world community closer together than ever. Now for a considerable time English has been spoken by overwhelmingly more non-native-speakers, and some of English they use are distinctive varieties of non-Standard English. At this point, it is difficult to forecast the grammatical changes that non-standard English could cause to Standard English in the future, the influence of non-native-speakers to English seems inevitable in spite of persistent resistance of native-speakers against deep structural changes.