Why Are Shorelines Important To The Environment

1791 Words4 Pages

One of the top benefits of a living shoreline is erosion control and protection from storms. Shoreline hardening has major impacts on the environment such as causing altering coastal morphology and increases in erosion. When we remove these natural coastlines and implement engineered technologies, we put the ecosystems and also, infrastructure near the shoreline, at risk. Over the past 10 years after a few major storms and tsunamis, people have begun to implement more natural shorelines and nature-based defense systems because of the failure of traditional erosion protection, such as hardened shorelines (Arkema, Griffin, Guerry, Maldonado, Silver, and Suckale, 2017). Four examples of coastal defenses that are being used near communities …show more content…

One major benefit to this type of protection is that natural shorelines provide many benefits to the environment even when there is not a storm, including habitats for animals such as fish and crustaceans. Some more advantages to this type of shorelines is enhancing water quality, as vegetation can filter the runoff, carbon sequestration, and use for recreation as it is safer for most people than climbing on a seawall or riprap revetment. Over the years, a natural shoreline will get stronger and more effective unlike built shorelines that stay the same or might even degrade over time. Something that can make natural shorelines very cost-effective is that they have the ability to repair naturally after a storm, whereas a built shoreline might need man made intervention after damage from a storm. Weaknesses of natural shorelines are that they take time to implement and grow if they are not already established, they require a large amount of space to implement which may not be possible in some areas, and that acquiring permits for natural shorelines may be difficult. But it is clear that the benefits to the environment outweigh the weaknesses of this infrastructure (Bamford, Sutton-Grier, and Wowk, …show more content…

In 16 of the 20 coastal counties, a dual-method survey was completed and participants were involved by using a modified Dillman method, which involved an initial mailing to invite them to complete the survey online, and then a reminder letter later on to follow up. Visual assessments were also done to assess damage from hurricane Irene and hurricane Arthur, in North Carolina’s outer banks. The shorelines were divided into six categories to be evaluated. The results were that bulkheads were the most damaged structures, more than any others. Residents’ with bulkheads on their properties were also exposed to more property damage and maintenance costs linked with hurricane damage, and also without hurricane damage. Natural shoreline caused the residents’ less yearly maintenance costs. Property owners also classified natural planting and sills more favorable than just sills for productiveness and longevity (Fodrie, Gittman, Morton, Neylan, Peterson, Scyphers and Smith,

Open Document