Who Is Inhumane In Lord Of The Flies

766 Words2 Pages

William Golding, the author of Lord of the Flies, fought as a soldier during World War II, a war known to depict the inhumanity and evils of man. He wrote Lord of the Flies shortly after returning from the devastating war. The novel opened to a plane escaping a war zone, with a groups of young boys, which ends up being shot down. Aristotle, a well-known philosopher, once said, “Man, when perfected, is the best of animals, but when separated from law and justice, he is the worst.” Throughout the novel, this quote develops in significance as laws and justice are compromised and the boys become more inhumane. Golding’s novel, Lord of the Flies, is portrayed as an allegory through the use of symbolic representation of the characters. Winston Churchill, a men who served as the prime minister of the United Kingdom for a portion of the 20th century, is symbolized by Ralph in Lord of the Flies. Churchill’s primary struggle during his reign included his fight against dictatorship in order to maintain a democracy. Similarly, Ralph attempted to create a …show more content…

Like Satan, Roger was sadistic; he found genuine pleasure from inflicted pain on others. Roger stood as proof that without laws, the worst of boys, which is normally hidden by rules, becomes apparent. “Roger’s arm was conditioned by a civilization that knew nothing of him and was in ruins” (Golding 61). For Roger especially, the absence of rules led to a loss of morality. This complete lack of morality was depicted as “Roger, with a sense of delirious abandonment, leaned all his weight on the lever” and released the boulder that killed Piggy (Golding 185). Roger no longer drew the line at only killing animals; he murdered a human, unremorsefully, simply because there would be no consequence. Civilization did not interest him in the least; instead, he enjoyed corrupting the others to become as savage as

Open Document