What Is Proctor's Responsibility In The Crucible

462 Words1 Page

In The Crucible, Miller suggests that often times, taking moral responsibility for the general public is easier, and more beneficial than it is to take moral responsibility for one’s own self, or family. In the stage directions, Miller states that “he [John] swings a pot out of the fire and smells it. Then he lifts out the ladle and tastes. He is not quite pleased” (Miller 384). Through this simple stage direction, Miller is able to relate how Proctor is unsatisfied with his family, as well as the man he has become within his own home. This stew, or staple of the home life, is an assortment of all his failings. This collection of faults, coupled with the integrity in which Proctor presents to those outside his family, is a compilation that can also be found in a reflection upon the common man. In the private of his home, Proctor is forced to acknowledge his poor judgement, as well as the consequences that follow. Elizabeth is representative of a constant reminder for his failing moral duty as the man of the house, and the father of their children. This stew, which he is unpleased with, is an embodiment of his discontent with his own home …show more content…

He refuses to “blacken all of them [his friends],” by allowing his confession to be hung in the town. By doing so, this act would incriminate the townspeople he chooses to deeply care for (Miller 452). He has already indirectly put his family in danger through his decision to engage in an affair with the young Abigail. However, he harshly refuses to allow his misjudgement to spread to the whole of Salem. This relates how Proctor holds the view of the town in a higher regard than his own home, or family. Although he is unable to fully reconcile with his wife, or himself, he views this justice he is bringing to Salem as an atonement for his

Open Document