Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Declaration of the rights of man and citizen English
Political impacts of the french revolution
Feudalism and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Declaration of the rights of man and citizen English
‘Liberté, égalité, fraternité’: the motto that France uses to this day and first came about as a result of the French Revolution. This in itself shows that the revolution had a major impact on France. It played a significant role in changing France through, for example, the new definition of nationalism, the abolition of the monarchy and the abolition of feudalism. Whether these changes succeeded in modernising France or resulted in something that was not any better than pre-revolutionary times is what will be discussed in more detail using the above three examples.
Nationalism did exist, to a certain extent, in pre-revolutionary France, and ‘it played an important role in the Revolution itself’ (O’Brien, 1988:18) but it only had a real impact on France after the revolution. The nationalism that existed before the revolution gave rise to the idea of a more equal society without the monarchy or clergy, therefore after the revolution, this pride in the nation was shown through the equality which they managed to achieve, and gaining the desired result of no monarchy and no clergy. It was the beginning of this concept of nationalism that resulted in Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen and consequently what brought about the motto that France uses today. O’Brien emphasises this idea of nation above everything else, including their king, which the French were driven to achieve, so not only was this idea of nationalism present before the revolution, being one of the causes of the revolution, but also after the revolution, staying with the French until the present day, and influencing other countries to exalt this idea of nationalism and implement it. However the nationalism that existed in relation to Joan of Arc was still cl...
... middle of paper ...
...ay had the revolution never occurred. There would not be such a strong sense of nationalism present in France today, without the revolution.
Works Cited
Best, G. (1988), The French Revolution and Human Rights in Best, G. (ed), The Permanent Revolution: The French Revolution and its Legacy 1789-1989, London: Fontana Press 101-127
Blanning, T. C. W. (1987), The French Revolution: Aristocrats versus Bourgeois?, London: MacMillan
Jones, C. (1988), The Longman Companion to the French Revolution, London and New York: Longman
Markoff, J. (1998), Violence, Emancipation and Democracy in Kates, G. (ed), The French Revolution: Recent Debates & New Controversies, London and New York: Routledge
O’Brien, C. C. (1988), Nationalism and the French Revolution in Best, G. (ed), The Permanent Revolution: The French Revolution and its Legacy 1789-1989, London: Fontana Press 17-48
Bibliography D. M. G. Sutherland, France 1789-1815 Revolution and Counterrevolution (London 1985). Tom Holmberg, “Napoleon and the French Revolution”, 1998, www.napoleonbonaparte.nl/html/body_nap_and_revolution.html. www.chesco.com/artman/napoleonbonaparte.html (Quotes by Napoleon Bonaparte). George Orwell, Animal Farm, Middlesex, England 1945. Colin Jones, The Longman Companion to the French Revolution, (New York, 1988).
the French Revolution. Hunt, Lynn & Censer, Jack. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press (2001)
Cobban, Alfred . "Historians and the Causes of the French Revolution." Aspects of the French Revolution. New York: George Braziller, 1968.
The source conveys a standpoint that is in favour of nationalism by portraying its positive aspects through the French Revolution. The quote is citing that nationalism motivated the French middle class to take action, providing the opportunity to overthrow the dominating
One more long-lasting effect from the French Revolution is nationalism. They called fraternity at the time, but both words share the same meaning. The French people fighting for their right to survive and later to protect their borders from foreign powers seeking to restore tyrannical order, produced a sense of pride and brotherhood. No longer being forced to front lines by an unseen monarch hundreds of miles away, the French people started to find, close to heart and empowering reasons, to defend their
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
The France practically changed from being an absolute monarchy to a republic overnight. Everything that the people of France had ever known was changed in a heart-beat. Their once beloved king had just been guillotined and it was now time to set up a new political system. The leaders of the revolution, the Jacobins, imagined a representative government that ruled on the principals of “liberte,” “egalite,” and “fraternity,” liberty, equality and broth...
Ed. John Hardman. French Revolution Documents 1792–95, vol. 2. “Père Duchesne, no. 313”. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1973.
Furet, Francois ‘Napoleon Bonaparte’ in G, Kate (ed.). The French Revolution: Recent Debates and New Controversies. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1997). Gildea, Robert. Barricades and Borders: Europe 1800-1914, Oxford University Press, New York 2nd edn, 1996.
...pave the way for democracy, but the bloodshed could have been more limited. Many people during the Revolution believed that France needed a change in many ways. They had achieved that by 1793. Many new reforms had been implemented in the country and it was much better off than it had been four years prior. I do agree with Kropotkin that the abolishing of serfdom and absolutism was a great achievement for France and that it did lead to a democratic system. Though this is true, the violence and bloodshed during the Revolution could have been minimized through committees and discussions. Schama is also right in that some men were too radical and their new found power went to their head. All said and done, the French Revolution was a bloody time in history, but it paved the way for a new democratic system not only for France but for many other countries as well.
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969. Print. The. Kreis, Steven. A. A. "Lecture 12: The French Revolution - Moderate Stage, 1789-1792.
Kirchberger, Joe H. The French Revolution and Napoleon. New York: Facts on File inc, 1989.
[7] Hunt, Lynn. Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley: U of California, 1984. Print.
Nardo, Don. A. The French Revolution. San Diego, California: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1999. Print.