Violence Never Works By Nagler Summary

The tendency for men to be brutal to his kind has been surprisingly common throughout the history of humanity. From serfdom to the enslavement of Africans in the West, from indentured servitude involving the exploitation of Asians to racial discrimination and all other examples in between, men have proven their capacity for incredible cruelty to other men. Equally common however, are the efforts of certain individuals, whether from within the ranks of the oppressed or from without, who make it their life’s work to bring some sort of amelioration to the situation of those who suffer. Among these freedom fighters there are two major schools of thought on how liberation for the oppressed may be accomplished; those who propose violence, and those

He went on to say that the acceptance of violence as an effective means for resolving problems has been deceitfully place upon us by the media through the portrayal of super heroes such a superman, who never appeared to misuse violence, showed violence as only doing good and no harm and that there are never any repercussions for its use. However, Nagler is stating that this is not the case and violence may appear to bring an immediate end to a situation, but there is always

He believes that there is blow back because generally one who loses through violence often harbors anger and resentment which promotes retribution. In his book he used the example of the use of force by the United States and its allied forces to get Saddam Hussein to withdraw his occupying troops from Kuwait. He agrees that this is an instance in which violence works but concludes that this action had set in motion a number of terrible events, something he explains is analogous to the ripples out of an event cone of which the September 11th attack on U.S soil is likely to be one. Nagler also discusses the instant solution that violence brings by highlighting and instance in which an intruder is shot dead by a home owner. Nevertheless, he opines that this victory is pales in comparism to the number of negatives it promotes when encouraged by this news items several homeowners arm themselves on to result in their children accidentally shooting each other or the number of home owners who get killed by intruders when they reach for their weapons. According to Nagler it is reasonable to conclude that violence works if ones focus is simply for immediate results. However, if one interest is long lasting and concrete resolution to a bad situation violence never