Venus Of Willendorf Analysis

432 Words1 Page

Western art has always presented itself with ideas of the perfect female figure. As time goes on the change and conquest for the perfect image of the female body seems never ending. The Venus of Willendorf was apart of the Old Stone age. Although one can guess we actually have no way of proving the sculptures message or purpose. From 25,000 BCE when Willendorf was mae fast forwarding to 350 BCE when Aphrodite was made marks the first nude sculpture of a women in Greek art. Praxiteles created the Aphrodite of Knidos. The name Aphrodite stems from the goddess of love. Both sculptures form their own romanticized version of the female body from two different perspectives. The Venus of Willendorf and the Aphrodite of Knido both successfully portray culture in different time periods. They both …show more content…

The piece is so small that one can fit it in just the palm of their hand. It’s lack of facial features and detailed body parts can imply to someone that it is meant to represent fertility. On the contrary Aphrodite is not a fertility symbol but rather a representation of goddess like beauty. In the Paleolithic time Venus’s image was the one idealized by the starving. The Venus of Willendorf has a lot of extra weight while Aphrodite does not. It is also important to note that Paleolithic art included almost all female figures and no males. In Aphrodite’s time the first sculpture of a naked woman came as a shock for them. The Aphrodite of Knidos, was sculpted from marble and has had it’s original copy lost. Because it was made using the medium of marble the 66 inch tall sculpture appears more human like. Aphrodite in the sculpture is shown before she takes a bath. Making their sculptures to look like they were actually performing human like activities was part of the Greek art style. As compared to Willendorf, even though they are both nude the sculpture of Aphrodite is not sensual in any

Open Document