Vanishing Act Sparknotes

548 Words2 Pages

POOOF! That is the sound of a professional tennis player vanishing in front of thousands of fans and spectators. I’m reading Vanishing Act by John Feinstein, and I finished the book. It was 279 pages. In Vanishing Act, Stevie Thomas and Susan Carol are both sent to New York to cover the U.S. Open. After one of the tennis players goes missing, Stevie and Susan have to investigate the mystery for them selves. I’ve come to find that the title Vanishing Act fits the novel very well. In my opinion, Vanishing Act fits the novel because it represents the conflict of a missing person in the novel, it ties in with how Nadia lost her match, and it represents the relationship between Susan and her uncle.
First of all, the title represents the conflict of a missing person in the novel. The “vanishing” in Vanishing Act represents Nadia Symanova, a pro tennis player, who vanished in the locker room before a tennis match. This becomes the main conflict of the novel, and it eventually turns into the main synopsis of the story. Everyone is so surprised at the fact that she just vanished before everyone’s eyes. Stevie even said to himself: “How can someone kidnap a player in front of thousands of witnesses” (Feinstein 65). This shows how odd and incredible the disappearance is, and how surprised …show more content…

Once Nadia Symanova is found, she had to play her match against Rubin. Just like how many other things vanished in the novel, so did Nadia’s game. When Nadia played Rubin she lost 6-7, 6-4, and 5-7. Nadia lost match point after match point, which lead her to eventually losing the match. After the match, Susan said: “Can you believe she lost that…thought she had the guts” (Feinstein 265). This shows how everyone thought Nadia would be able to win the match with the lead she had, but she didn’t. This also proves that Nadia’s skill vanished in the second half of the match. That is why the “vanishing” in Vanishing Act fits the book so

Open Document