Unitary Confederate Government

692 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What are the similarities and differences between federal and confederate governments

Of all the many different systems of government, they all have one thing in common, overseeing rules, regulations and interactions of the population that lives under them. It is a government’s responsibility and duty to serve its people and protect their rights. However, like all government systems, unitary, confederate, and federal systems have many advantages and disadvantages. A unitary government is a one-sided relationship between a national government and its political sub-units. In other words, the central supreme government makes all the decisions, laws, and policies for its subordinate governments. Like a National government having complete control over the state governments. Or the United Kingdom’s rule over Scotland.
In a unitary government everyone feels a sense of belonging. The states of the nation are inspired to uniformity and patriotism because they all have it in common which is one of unitary government’s strongest advantageous points. The entire nation has the same laws and policies so no one state has more freedom and liberties than another. It doesn’t take long to approve or put things into effect because …show more content…

The member states have the majority of the legislative power, causing the center to be incapable of passing or enforcing laws. Also significant subjects of national interest such as treaties, maintenance of armies, currency issues, cannot be handled by the center. Another disadvantage is financial powers. Regulating the national revenue isn’t the function of the center government, meaning it has no authority regarding taxation. Because the center has virtually no power, there is usually a tussle for power between the states. Secessionist tendencies and internal power struggles tend to lead to fighting and breaking apart. The confederate system isn’t known for surviving the test of time, making it an unpopular form of

Show More
Related

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion this is why tyranny and federalism, separation of power, checks and balances and big and small states all mean that they are important to know also the branches are a big part especially in the separation of

    Read More

  • How Does the Constitution Protect the People from Tyranny?

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to secure the protection of the people’s rights of freedom from the imprisonment of tyranny, a compound government was formed. Central and State government came together to form the compound government, which in other words means federalism. It is one of the many elements that make up the protection of freedom from tyranny, “Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people.” (Madison FP # 51) The states combined covered our need of protection, protection of the countries by the Central government and protection of the people by the States government. Also by joining themselves together, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Madison FP # 51)

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist Federal And Confederate Government

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    If you drive to another state, the state that you drove to is required to honor your driver’s license. The states are also required to recognize any sort of official decision made by the courts in a different state

    Read More

  • Civil War Sectionalism

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    North and South The United States of America, the great democratic experiment, was just that. Not since the great Greek culture had a government of, for, and by the people existed. The entire world felt, that on a large scale, democracy would inevitably lead to anarchy; our founding fathers were determined to prove them wrong. But as the political stand off with the British became a secession issue, a great issue split the future nation. Slavery, a southern necessity, both social and economic, threatened the unity of our nation. A nation that would one day be the greatest the world had ever known. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the south the temperate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Cultivation of this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern Colonies, though, were much more dependent on small farms, with closely knit communities. These differences were the seed of a sectional division that would plague the nation for a century. During the late seventeenth century, this fissure in the ideals of the colonies became apparent. Following the constant political irreverence from Britain, a majority of colonial representatives felt the need for independence. The Declaration of Independence was the document written to do this. It called for an abolition of slavery as well as freedom from British rule. Unfortunately, the South would hear nothing of it. Being strong defenders of states rights, most of the Southern states adhered to their believe in a government less like a supreme authority and more like a dominion of independent states. They would rather stay loyal to their oppressive government than participate in one that shunned their way of life. In order to keep their dreams of independence, they North was forced to make the one cession they did not wish to make. In order to keep a unified nation, the slavery issue was deliberately absent from the Declaration. Some of the Northern delegates were outraged, but none more than John Adams. A renowned proponent of equal rights, he was one of few that saw the irony in establishing a free society without freeing those in bondage. John Adams seems now more like Nostrodamus when he voiced his concern about the slavery issue for future generations. He did not know it, but the couldn’t have been more right.

    Read More

  • Secession in the South

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some states are currently threatening to leave the country because of the belief that the government has too much power over the people and the laws our country has to follow. In our society, we live by laws set by the government, and if any of them are broken, there is a punishment. These laws are set to make sure that the people of America are following the way things are ran so the country will not collapse. Although these laws are set for the safety of the people, sometimes when the government has that kind of power to make people follow certain things they should not have to follow, many issues arise. In the late 1800’s, many issues emerged between the South and the Union on whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the United States. The Southern states did have the right to secede because of political, economical, and social reasons. These reasons include numerous examples of the Union treating the South unfairly and violating the terms of the U.S constitution.

    Read More

  • The Reconstruction of the Union After the Civil War

    2101 Words  | 5 Pages

    The reconstruction of the Union began under President Lincoln before the end of the war, and carried on by President Johnson after the assassination of President Lincoln. After Lincoln’s death, the leadership of the nation bestowed upon Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. According to A. Brinkley (pg. 375), Johnson revealed his plan for reconstruction or “Restoration”, as he preferred to call it, soon after he took office and implemented it during the summer of 1865 when Congress was in recess. Like Lincoln, he offered some form of amnesty to Southerners who would take a pledge of loyalty to the Union. In most other respect, however, his plan resembled the Wade-Davis Bill. The next phase of reconstruction, known as the Congressional Plan or "Radical" modernization had begun, which undid everything started by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson. These radicals, mostly republicans, motivated by three main factors revenge, concern for the freedmen, and political concerns. The Radicals in Congress pushed through a number of measures designed to assist the freedmen, but also demonstrate the supremacy of Congress over the president. These events included the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Army Appropriations Act. The Radical Republicans prepared an effort in Congress to impeach the president Johnson as a payback for resisting their platforms. The vote in the Senate was 35-19 for conviction, one vote short of the necessary two-thirds. This was in turn to a few Republicans that had crossed over and voted with the Democrats, thus refuting the ultimate retaliation to the Radicals. If the removal of President Johnson had gone thru, it might have permanently weakened the executive branch. Congr...

    Read More

  • The Civil War: Reconstruction

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil war could very easily be known as one of the greatest tragedies in United States history. After the Civil War, the people of The United States had so much anger and hatred towards each other and the government that 11 Southern states seceded from the Nation and parted into two pieces. The Nation split into either the Northern abolitionist or the Southern planation farmers. The Reconstruction era was meant to be exactly how the name announces it to be. It was a time for the United States to fix the broken pieces the war had caused allowing the country to mend together and unite once again. The point of Reconstruction was to establish unity between the states and to also create and protect the civil rights of the former slaves. Although Reconstruction failed in many aspects such as the upraise in white supremacy and racism, the reconstruction era was a time the United States took a lead in the direction of race equality.

    Read More

  • Factionalism in America

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    Following the failure of the Articles of Confederation, a debate arose discussing how a centralized government ought to be organized. The prevailing opinion ultimately belonged to the Federalists, whose philosophy was famously outlined in The Federalist Papers. Recognizing that in a free nation, man would naturally divide himself into factions, they chose not to remedy this problem by stopping it at its source; instead, they would limit its effects by placing strict structural safeguards within the government's framework. The Federalists defined a facti...

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some of the advantages of having a federal government are that the national level of government can work on the bigger picture tasks while the state government solve the local and specific issues, so that each departments time can be used wisely and efficiently. Furthermore, if citizens took their everyday problems to the national level, then the national government would be over worked and the citizen might have to travel far to even reach the states capital. Each side of the

    Read More

  • Guard Against Tyranny

    480 Words  | 1 Pages

    The constitution guides against tyranny through the concept of federalism..Federalism is is a compound government made up of two parts.These two parts include a state and a central government.Federalism provides double security to citizens.The three branches of government can control monitor each other. As a citizen of the U.S. protection is offered by the central government.State governments have the power to control more local issues

    Read More

  • Preventing Tyranny: The Power of the Constitution

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is trying to say is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything. The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs, and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude, that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents tyranny. The first guard against tyranny was Federalism, which means a system of government in which power is divided between a federal government and state government.

    Read More

  • The Federal Government and its Role in the States

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    The federal system is a very complex because it allocates responsibility to state and federal government. Our federal system is one which powers are divided by the central government and state government. They both act directly upon the citizens and must agree with constitutional changes. The division of power among the states and federal government is called federalism. In the past there have been smart president and leader that gave the federal government more power than the states. We have view our country shift powers among the states and central government.

    Read More

  • Anti-Federalist vs Federalist

    2017 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to the Federalists in the early stages of the American republic, a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the Union. This necessity for a more organized central government was a result of the ineffectiveness of the Article of Confederation’s government that was without a unifying government body. One component of this philosophy was the creation of an executive and other federal branche...

    Read More

  • Limited Government Essay

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    Then there is the state government which are responsible for governing affairs within their borders, and carrying out federal laws and programs at the state level. They are governed by their own constitutions and retain any rights that the U.S. Constitution does not exclusively grant to the federal government. The state government is limited as they cannot form alliances with other states and must honor and respect the laws and institutions of the other states. And finally there is the federal government which is the central and highest level of government in the U.S. It is divided into three branches and each branch has its own rights and power to check and balance the powers of each branch. The federal government has the power to regulate taxes, establish federal welfare programs and make laws in the interest of the nation as a whole. There are also limitations set to the federal government’s authority, as they cannot ask local law enforcements agencies to do minor administrative jobs. Although all levels of government have their own responsibilities there are limits to interfering with other governments

    Read More

  • Difference Between Unitary And Federal Government

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a unitary system, the central government is able to give lower levels of government power but can easily take it back; lower levels do not have the right to power. “...A unitary state can devolve considerable powers to local and regional governments...unitary state cannot remain a taken-for-granted notion” (Carmichael 6). A federal government lets states have the right to their power, and as stated before has a constitution unlike a unitary. Unitary political structures resemble dictatorships, unlike a federal government which does not. A unitary government is a more centralized form of government compared to a federal, “...a federal state is a more decentralized form of government than a unitary government” (Carmichael 6). Similarities between the two include both governments see the aspect of elections as very important, are systems of national administration, are in charge of creating policies, and both are responsible for representing the country in discussions and

    Read More

More about Unitary Confederate Government

Open Document