Unanswered Questions about Welfare Reform

2740 Words6 Pages

Unanswered Questions about Welfare Reform

Welfare is a means of financial assistant for poverty stricken individuals. Year after year presidents have attempted to reconstruct the welfare system so it does not act as a backbone for those who do not want to work, and year after year success seemed out of reach. That is, until President Bill Clinton thought he had the answer. He signed the new welfare reform act in August of 1996, vowing to “end welfare as we know it.” Terminating a 62 year-old federal entitlement, President Clinton put a limit on how long one can receive federal welfare assistance (Casse 36). Yet, this so called reform is not that at all. The government doesn’t see what happens to ex-welfare recipients after they are released from the program, and the youth of our country is catching the wrath of the reform. There are so many questions left unanswered about the reform.

The new welfare reform act put limit on how long one can receive federal assistance. Receivers of welfare were ordered to seek and find employment or go to school within two years or lose assistance. If a job or education were not obtained within this period of time assistance would be terminated after five years. The law also demanded that each state had to determine eligibility. It is a federal problem no longer. The law gives a block grant to each of the 50 states, distributing cash assistance when deemed necessary. As Casse points out, the law required each state to construct work requirements as a part of its welfare program. By the year 2002, states will need to show that at least 50% of those receiving welfare are involved in some form of work or training in exchange for benefits. These changes to the welfare system all come with exemptions, qualifications, alternative requirements, and rules and regulations that vary from state to state (Casse 36).

At first glance the rules for welfare recipients look like a sufficient way to stop welfare leeches, but if legislatures put heart-felt thought into this new plan they would have realized all of the flaws it carried. President Clinton was too busy boasting and bragging about the declining caseloads to notice the real effect it was having on everyone. A few huge problems drown out the welfare reformers’ chorus. According to Telly, “The first and most obvious is that it was too soon to make any meaningful...

... middle of paper ...

...elter (Telly 9). Trying to end welfare is not enough; something must be done about poverty.

Works Cited

Bridge, Junior. “Welfare Missing an Some Information.” Quill May 1996: 1-3

Casse, Daniel. “Why Welfare Reform is Working.” The Nation September 1997: 36-43

Cooper, Marc. “When Push Comes to Shove.” The Nation. 2 June 1997: 11-16.

EBSCOhost Academic Search Elite. Article # 9705252875 (31 October 2001).

Heim, David. “ Welfare Measure.” Christian Century 10 December 1997: 1147

EBSCOhost Academic Search Elite. Article # 9712223937 (31 October 2001).

Ivins, Molly. “The R’s and Reform.” The Progressive Nov. 1995: 46 EBSCOhost

Academic Search Elite. Article # 9510272661 (29 October 2001).

Murphy, Sharon. “Ending Poverty as We Know It.” The Progressive February

1998: 3-14

Polakow, Valarie. “On a Tightrope Without a Net.” The Nation 1 May 1997: 4-5.

Pollitt, Katha. “Subject to Debate.” The Nation 18 December 1996: 777.

Telly, Erin. “Ending Welfare.” The Progressive October 1997: 8. EBSCOhost Academic

Search Elite. Article # 9710230947 (28 October 2001).

Wills, Garry. “The New Welfare Mess.” Christian Century 10 April 1997: 380-382.

Open Document