Two Sides Of The Coin James Merrell Summary

1079 Words3 Pages

Two Sides of the Coin The two articles by James Merrell and Neal Salisbury offer contrasting viewpoints on how the arrival of Europeans impacted Native Americans. The arguments presented by Merrell center around three distinct phases of change: disease, trade, and settlers. He proposed that occurrences forced natives to conform with European norms. This is an incomplete portrait of the encounter, as he described the natives as an entirely passive player, only reacting to the actions of Europeans. Neal Salisbury goes beyond this simplistic image. He examined the natives as active agents in the newly forming world. They were far more engaged in affairs than Merrell described. The article by Salisbury represents a better understanding of the …show more content…

In suggesting this, one is not excusing Europeans of wrongdoing, or laying blame at the doorstep of the indigenous population, but recognizing that “Indians are integral to the history of colonial North America,” writes Salisbury. They adapted to the changing environment, but in certain instance would attempt to use the circumstances to their own benefit. A shortcoming of the article by Merrell is its narrow view of natives. He paints them with a rather broad brush. While he did mention, “The range of native societies produced by this mingling of ingredients probably exceeded the variety of social forms Europeans and Africans developed,”(17) he spent the bulk of his article focusing on the Indians of south piedmont. He presented a very in-depth picture of these regional cultures and involvement with Europeans, but this fails to provide an adequate examination of indigenous people as a whole. Salisbury wrote, “[I]ndigenous North Americans exhibited a remarkable range of languages, economies, political systems, beliefs, and material cultures.” The range of people scattered throughout the North American continent was as diverse as the terrain. Even as Merrell put it, there was a“broad spectrum of Indian adaptations” to European …show more content…

For example, the non-farming Apaches and Navajos were dependent on the produce of the Pueblo tribe. This “alien” economic system was one many native took active part in. It was not entirely imposed upon them. At first, many natives wanted to trade with Europeans because of their potential they possessed supernatural

Open Document