To What Extent Was The Carolingian Renaissance

1626 Words4 Pages

The Carolingian Unification

Jay Ratajczak
History of Civilization I
November 2, 2015

The phrase “Carolingian Renaissance” may conjure up images of a great revival in learning, a love for classical thought, and a general time of great education and progression. However, was the the Carolingian Renaissance actually a renaissance in the traditional sense of the word? Or was it more a tool used for the unification of an empire? One scholar plainly says that by definition it is hard for the Carolingian Renaissance to be thought of as a renaissance at all:
Broadly speaking, scholars use the term “renaissance” in two senses; first, in a more general sense, as a term denoting a certain kind of civilization which emerges as …show more content…

Einhard, Charlemagne’s biographer said that, “He also tried to write, and used to keep tablets and blank pages in bed under his pillow so that in his leisure hours he might accustom his hand to form the letters; but as he did not begin his efforts at an early age but late in life, they met with poor success” (Einhard, Hollister 86). Given Charlemagne’s love of learning, it is logical that the movement started in the center of the Palace, and then slowly spread throughout the empire into places such as Fulda, St. Gall, and Lorsch (Charles Dawson 200). The main instructor of this time was Alcuin, the leader of the school in York, he was brought in and taught according to the tradition of seven liberal arts, in the style of Isidore and the Venerable Bede (Christopher Dawson). In reality, Alcuin was not necessarily a teacher of great merit, he simply was a schoolmaster (Christopher Dawson). However, to the fractured world of the post-Roman world, this was exactly what was needed to pull them out of the depths of ignorance (Christopher Dawson). The biggest improvements in culture were in writing, art, and architecture. For example. Alcuin and the leaders of the movement helped create a reformation in the copying of documents (Christopher …show more content…

(Monumenta Germaniae Historiae, Legum, Alfred Boretius and Victor Krause).
The reason for the splintering is intriguing. Charlemagne divided his empire among his sons. This was the tradition at the time, but it seems odd given the fact that he spent most of his life attempting to create an empire through conquest, and then used the Church, writing, architecture and art to unify it, merely to split it apart amongst his

Open Document