Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characters And Characterization In Shakespeares Works
The possibility of evil character analysis essay quiz
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the corner of your eye you see a mysterious character hiding and lingering in the shadows. Seeing that the character is different from the others, you get the feeling that they will soon be very important later in the play but you’re not really sure how yet. In the play Titus Andronicus by William Shakespeare, Aaron the Moor although a slave becomes a big part of the whole play, getting involved in all the trickery that occurs. Aaron, by his actions throughout the book, shows that he is the most deceitful person in the play by being able to manipulate all the people around him for his advantage. Aaron uses people’s thoughts about what they think his personality is and uses it to manipulate them. With his mysterious look, it’s not surprising …show more content…
After Aaron finished telling the rest of his plans and giving the letter to Tamora, she thought that it was a great plan, shouting “Ah, my sweet Moor, sweeter to me than life!” (2.3.51) being able to easily manipulate the new Empress. When they saw Martius and Quintus near the hole where Bassianus died, they were sentenced to death. Upon hearing the news, Titus was desperate and would do anything to keep them from dying a dishonorable death. Aaron saw an opportunity then to trick Titus, “Let Marcus, Lucius, or thyself, old Titus,...chop off your hand and send it to the King; he for the same will send thee hither both thy sons alive, and that shall be the ransom for their fault” (3.1.154-158) hearing this news from Aaron, Titus did not hesitate and even let Aaron himself chop his hand. Of course Aaron knew that his sons were already dead when after chopping off his hand says “I go Andronicus, and for thy hand look by and by to have thy sons with thee. Their heads, I mean.” (3.1.203-205) A few hours later, Titus was give back both his sons’ heads and his hand back by a …show more content…
After a span of nine months, Aaron received news about a newborn baby boy from the nurse. Knowing that it was his, he concluded that Tamora did not want anything to do with the baby because it could cause trouble with Saturninus and her. While on his way to the Goths to raise his child, he got caught and was sent to Lucius. After getting captured, his only goal was to save his one and only child; “Lucius, save the child...If thou do this, I’ll show thee wondrous things that highly may advantage thee to hear.” (5.1.54-57) Aaron knew that Lucius was not able to contact anybody while he was banished to the Goths to raise an army so he knows how valuable the information he will give him will be and could be the only way to save his son’s life giving off a little bit of his loving, softer, more father-like side. Aaron makes Lucius “Swear that he shall, and then I will begin...Hast a thing within thee called conscience,” (5.1.71-76) “he” referring to his son, making Lucius swear to his god that he will raise Young Aaron as his own since Aaron knows that Lucius cannot go against his god. Even though Aaron is captured and seems powerless, he is still able to turn Lucius to unknowingly obey his orders by finding his weakness which is his religion and using it against him. Aaron knows that he will not live after everything he has done, so he is
Strangely, regardless of the fact that Aaron immediately returns to behaving diabolically, it is noteworthy that out of all the parents in Titus Andronicus, Shakespeare portrays Aaron as the parent who sacrifices all for his child. Tamora believed herself to be wholly degraded after begging for Alarbus’ life, and she made no further sacrifices for her children. To Titus’ credit, he chopped off his hand in an effort to save two of his sons, but Aaron gave his life for the benefit of his child. Shakespeare skillfully salvages the noble family line, and the remaining Andronicus family members, mainly Lucius and his son, will continue as imperialists. Plainly, although Titus lost many sons in the war with the Goths, he did not despair over his losses.
...d how He expresses it distresses Aaron until he decides to come to terms with his own beliefs, whether they are explicitly stated in the Bible or not. When and how people must express their love for God is a tricky subject among the Hartzler family. Aaron’s parents believe in doing nothing but what the BIble says, while Aaron thinks that just because the Bible doesn’t mention something doesn’t mean that it is bad. He notices things that are never discussed or are outdated, and wonders about how he could love Jesus yet disagree with his parents. Through the arguments between him and his family, Aaron finally realizes that he needs to decide for himself what to believe in and how to express it. By the end of the book, when Aaron has matured, what were once his core beliefs have been tossed out the window and replaced by his new idea of life and how to live it.
The audience never witnesses Aaron's supposed teachings however, nor is it likely that if he were to continue living as before that he would commit the acts he pledges himself to as he is to be hanged (Act V Scene I Lines 125-144). Aaron talks of evil and trickery, while Tamora lives its epitome, marrying herself into the queen-ship of the conquering tribe. When presented with his child Aaron does care for it, and only agrees to speak upon the condition that it shall be saved. This insight into his character makes him seem almost a worthier person than Titus who murders his own sons. The villain shows more care for his kin than the hero does for his. This serves to make Aaron a more realistic villain by making him more human.
In a play, there are always heroes and villains. Sometimes, one can not always tell who are the heroes and villains. William Shakespeare, in his play, Julius Caesar, shows the difference of heroes and villains using the senators of Rome to show the difference between heroes and villains. The hardest character to determine was the hero Brutus, by analyzing his loyalty, background, and his intentions, one can determine that Brutus was a hero to Rome.
The fiddler, though not incredibly important, was a key character in that he provided foreshadowing.When he said, "But the very devil's got into that fiddle of mine.", he was forshadowing the coming of the devil to disturb the merriments. A very key character in this play is the devil himself, which took the name of Scratch (for that was what he was called in New England communities). He had come to steal the soul of Jabez Stone, claiming that he had a right to Jabez because of a legal contract. Last- but most certainly not least in this story- is the great Governor of New Hampshire, loved by all, Daniel Webster. Daniel Webster was not only the governor, but an excelent orator. He had a way of using words to pursued the opinion of others, sometimes by conve...
Macbeth is an interesting character as he is a respectable man at the beginning of the play however this all changes once he is granted the thane of cawdor as the prophecy the witches made has come half true to him.
Minor characters play a very crucial role in Shakespear's Hamlet. They serve as narrators for events that occurred outside the immediate play: the Dane's ghost. Distinct contrasts are created through the usage of the play's minor characters. The reader gains new perspective on Hamlet's character when he is compared with Laertes. The presence of these minor characters can also have a direct effect on the action of the play. The actors in the play within the play are used to expose the guilt of Claudius; Hamlet then has proof of the King's crimes. The expertise use of these characters - either to exemplify good and purity, or to spread the vile corruption which permeates Elsinore - is one of the main reasons for Hamlet's success as one of the greatest plays ever written.
A rosy cheeked child plays “Chutes and Ladders” with uncanny ruthlessness as his soft, plump hands curl into fists ready to obliterate the board in a reign of terror. Only an unforgiving god who waits for the game of a prophecy to unfold on its victims rivals the child’s merciless disposition. In each case, the game is unwinnable for the tyrant’s opponents. The opponent’s only choice is to refuse to play the game; he can refuse to be subjugated to either the child’s tantrums or the god’s wrath. For a god, a prophecy is a game that makes the competitor the rival and the pawn. Apollo manipulates both Oedipus and Jocasta in the game that is their lives. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus and Jocasta struggle to survive in a world that Sophocles portrays
can see his importance in the title of the play; he is named in the
Othello's character in the duration of "The Tragedy of Othello", by the world's greatest writer, William Shakespeare, is first shown as a hero of war and a man of great pride and courage. The other main characters in the play all form their own opinions of him and, as the play continues, his character begins to deteriorate and become less noble. Othello's character changes from a flawless military leader, to become a barbaric murderer.
...f his honor. When Titus allows Aaron to cut off his hand, he is letting Aaron take away his honor. By the end of the play, Titus has nothing to show of the honor he once killed for.
Many would perceive madness and corruption to play the most influential role in Hamlet. However, it could be argued that the central theme in the tragedy is Shakespeare's presentation of actors and acting and the way it acts as a framework on which madness and corruption are built. Shakespeare manifests the theme of actors and acting in the disassembly of his characters, the façades that the individuals assume and the presentation of the `play within a play'. This intertwined pretence allows certain characters to manipulate the actions and thoughts of others. For this reason, it could be perceived that Shakespeare views the `Elsinorean' tragedy as one great puppet show, "I could see the puppets dallying".
Internal and external struggles influence people to action, be it swift and daring or cunning and low. In Shakespeare's plays, the events around and within a character often combine to cause a character to act in a manner that would be considered out of character or unnatural for the person. Shakespeare uses these characters to provide the audience with a lesson or theme; to give them something they can apply to life and see learn from. In Othello, the character he uses as an example is, in fact, Othello. Shakespeare informs his readers of how doubts caused by rumors and lies can lead to the breakdown of even a once noble person.
As a minor character, Roderigo has a significant impact on several themes such as manipulation, jealousy and betrayal. Throughout Shakespeare’s drama, Roderigo is manipulated into performing tasks in which Iago does not want to take part. Roderigo’s jealousy towards Othello increases as the play progresses. His endless love for Desdemona leads him to his tragic death where he has been betrayed by a person in which he once called his friend. At a first glance, a minor character may appear to have an insignificant role, but upon observing them in detail, their role can be much more significant than first perceived.
In this play, three timeless elements that are very relevant today and throughout history are prejudice, money, and love. Shakespeare included many examples of all these themes in his play. Bassanio, Antonio, Gratiano, Lorenzo, Portia, and Shylock are the main representatives of these themes. You could take anyone in history and compare him or her to anyone in this play. An example of this would be the prejudice and mean spirit that both Shylock and Hitler share. Shakespeare did a very good job showing these elements in real life scenarios. Samuel Taylor Coleridge put it perfectly; this play is a “representation of men in all ages and all times.”