Tim's Vermeer: Film Analysis

599 Words2 Pages

Tim Jenison, the man behind the documentary film entitled Tim’s Vermeer set out to replicate a painting in the style of the beloved artist Johannes Vermeer. In order to do this, Jenison replicated a system of lenses that he believed Vermeer had used hundreds of years before him for the sake of duplicating the correct light variations around the objects of his muse. The course of the documentary showcases Jenison as he first constructs this hypothesis of Vermeer mastering light, moves on to Jenison's development of his lense device, and finally to Jenison using his device to paint a work of art in hope that it will be comparably close enough to the work of Vermeer that his hypothesis can be proven. Whether or not Jenison succeeded can be debated and was one of the topics that the panel of professors including Professors Baugh, Gorchoff, Myers, Willhardt, and Wright discussed at the convocation. …show more content…

This quote I felt summed up the film being discussed and Jenison as a person. Professor Baugh then referenced the film as he touched on the topic of chemical process in photography. According to Baugh, “The only reason photography was not invented at the time was because the chemical process had not yet been perfected.” However, in the film, it is said that Vermeer, if he did in fact use a device similar to Jenison’s, was creating photographs. This is because the replication of light would have in a way, been pixilated. Professor Baugh also showed the audience real life examples of light manipulation. As he procured the light and mirror to form a reflection of the light bulb on the surrounding walls, I was shown a simular type of device that Jenison had been discussing within the

Open Document