They Say I Say The American Dream Analysis

737 Words2 Pages

In the book “They Say I Say”, Brandon King writes an essay bringing multiple perspectives on what Americans golden way of living is. The “American dream” is what most American citizens all strive for. Early settlers came in to try to achieve “the dream”. Those who already lived in America choose to stay because of its grand possibilities. The United States of America is the only place in the world where you have the rights to freedom of speech. What is the American dream? It used to be said that you could come to America and go from rags to riches; you could come with nothing and achieve everything you ever wanted. Take a second and think. We all ponder upon, is the so called “American dream” dead or alive? This has been a steamy topic …show more content…

King then goes into detail giving statistics and explaining more in depth about the money situations in today’s world. Back in the olden days, King explained that the American dream meant having fancy vehicles, name-brand houses, and simply owning expensive items. He “would redefine the American Dream today as the potential to work for an honest, secure way of life and save for the future”. King believes now people are okay with a middle-class lifestyle and just want to have stable employment. Today’s so called “American Dream” is a modest, more realistic version of the old dream. In King’s eyes, the American dream is very much alive, it’s just and changing its meaning due to past and current economic situations. King uses several different sources to gain forms of credibility and prove he is correct. I’m sure this is due to the fact that King was a student and hasn’t developed full credibility of his own just yet. King quotes study after study and statistic after statistic from 2005 to 2010 and uses big words to make him sound intelligent, which makes his argument very convincing. He states how he views the topic, how those who support his vision view it, and how those who disagree view it and then, why he disagrees with them on their ideas and logic

Open Document