Theme Of Honor In Prince Hotspur

1275 Words3 Pages

I think that Hal is a very smart character even though many would argue because he hangs out with commoners so they can help him to become a better king. I also think that the main reason why the play is most centered on Hal between two world is to show that in the world of the tavern Hal is enjoying his teenage years and doing what youth enjoy doing. For example, in this world he laughs, have fun, and most important be himself without anyone telling him to act honorable or act like a prince. Also, the world of court is consist of adult political work and serious governance, in which Prince Hal hates to be because he has to follow the code of chivalric and he has to act like a prince. Prince Hal underwent a transformation throughout the play. …show more content…

The powers of us may serve so great a day. Come, let us take a muster speedily. Doomsday is near. Die all, die merrily” (act 4 scene 1). Hotspur idea of honor is fighting in a battle and taking away the throne from King Henry because he has taken away the respect that the Percy family deserve. Overall, Hotspur define honor by battling King Henry and the Percy family gaining respect for what they did for the King. Like Hotspurs view on honor, Hal defines honor that can be won through wars, but most important defeating Hotspur and exchanging his bad reputations for Hotspurs glory because he states that “ I will redeem all this on Percy’s head, And, in the closing of some glorious day, Be bold to tell you that I am your son, When I will wear a garment all of blood And stain my favors in a bloody mask, Which, washed away, shall scour my shame with it” (act 3 scene 2). Hal wants to prove his father wrong for everything he thinks of him and redeem himself in his father's eyes. Also, Hal idea of honor is killing Hotspur which would make him an honorable noble and it would gain his honor by taking his “His glorious deeds” (act 3 scene 2), in conclusion he thinks of honor as something that can be taken away from others through their death in order to gain respect. Unlike how Prince Hal and Hal define Honor define honor, Falstaff has a completely different meaning of honor which would lead to his actions and the way the readers assess him. Falstaff does not believe in honor the way the other characters define it because for Falstaff it is only “ A word” and it is not worth dying for. To show how completely Falstaff view on honor is different than other characters is the way he acts during the battle because he states “twas time to counterfeit, or that hot termagant Scot had paid me scot and lot too. Counterfeit” (act 5 scene 4).

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Prince Hal

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hal is a cold, calculating Machiavellian ruler. According to Machiavelli’s popular theory, being a successful leader has nothing to do with being a nice person or doing the right thing. Instead, it’s about being inventive, manipulative, crafty, and willful. Hal is an intelligent character who put all those attributes to work when he articulated a grand plan to fool everyone around him in order to gain power. One critic claims that traditionally there are two common ways to interpret Prince Hal's development. The first is to see it as a celebration of a great king in training who grows in his responsibility and develops into a mature political leader. The second view sees Prince Hal as a cold Machiavel who uses his friends as means to a political end, without much regard for their feelings. (Johnston 1).

    Read More

  • Honor in Prince Hal

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first influence that Shakespeare illustrates over Prince Hal is that of Falstaff, a fat old man who seems to spend his life in seedy taverns accruing massive amounts of debt. From his devious scheme to rob unknowing travelers at the beginning of the story to his diatribe on what honor is not, it is clear that Falstaff has a very distinct notion of his own personal honor, and he seems to be trying to project that same notion onto Hal; however, as Hal becomes closer to his father, Falstaff's honor becomes less appealing. Falstaff treats Hal and King Henry IV to his own personal code of honor-or lack thereof:

    Read More

  • Sir John Falstaff

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    Humans are addicted to judging others on their first impression. Humans will never read into the book, they just look at the cover. Many people, both fictional and nonfictional can not be judged until you study them. Someone who first appears to be only comic relief, could end up to be a very important character. Sir John Falstaff is but one of these people. Falstaff's righteousness hides under his vocalization. John Falstaff's character is hard to understand without analyzing his words. He loves to play games with his speech. Falstaff tricks his audience with complex words and phrases. Often John would win over his opponent by tricking them into saying things that they did not mean or getting them to think that he is not that bad. Falstaff said this in Part I act II scene IV. "... A question not to be asked. Shall the son of England prove a thief and take purses? A question to be asked. There is a thing, Harry, which thou hast often heard of, and it is known to many in our land by the name of pitch. This pitch, as ancient writers do report, doth defile; so doth the company thou keepest. For, Harry, now I do not speak to thee in drink, but in tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; not in words only, but in woes also; and yet there is a virtuous man whom I have often noted in thy company, but I know not his name." In this passage, the Prince and Fastaff trade places in speech and try to make the other look dumb. Fastaff later goes on to say that this wonderful person that the King is talking about. The way Falstaff does this proves him to be very keen. He proves that even though he may look dumb, he will still put up a good fight. Falstaff is very bold about his thoughts and opinions. He stands out because he is not afraid to think his own way. While most people agree, because of the other people around them, Falstaff chooses to make his own decisions and think for himself. This is proven when Falstaff and the prince switch places in a verbal fight. Every one else in the book thinks of the Prince as a perfect young man because he is the prince, however Falstaff is too smart for this, he points out that the prince is a thief.

    Read More

  • Honor in Arthur Miller's The Crucible

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Honor can be defined by how one holds them in the public eye. Others may say that honor is how you live your life when none can see your actions. However defined honor can play major roles in how a person will act in a given situation. The Crucible by Arthur Miller has excellent examples of how honor can manipulate people’s decisions in times of importance. John proctor holds his moral standpoint and does not falter into the temptations of selfishness, while Elizabeth would describe honor as how a person lives their lives. Some can even describe honor as what is most important in life; family. Giles believed that his life was the ultimate object he could sacrifice to maintain his family’s happiness. However honor can be defined, one thing is certain; Everyone has some degree of honor in their lives.

    Read More

  • King Henry IV

    594 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hal seems to lack honor at the commencement of the play, but near the end we see him display a different kind true honor which will be explained more in depth. Hal also shows his honor when he rejects the requests put forth by his good friend Falstaff and sides with his natural father to fight loyally. Even though Henry views Hal as an unworthy candidate for the thrown, Hal proves him wrong by displaying attributes that are very honorable. In King Henry’s point of view, Hal doesn’t seem much like an heir to his thorwn. Instead of living at the court to aid his father govern England, he frolics in the Taverns of Eastcheap with a group of petty thieves.

    Read More

  • Expectations of Kingship in Henry IV by William Shakespeare

    847 Words  | 2 Pages

    We see Prince Henry being compared to Hotspur many times in this play. I think that it is trying to show how Hotspur is the true example of royalty, not Hal. When King Henry talks to his son in Act 3, Scene 2, he lets him know how he feels that Hotspur is more worthy of the throne then he is.

    Read More

  • Prince Henry Rite Of Passage

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    Prince Harry’s plan to kill Hotspur puts his life on the line to prove his valor. He swears all this in the name of God, a solemn oath. Act five shows Harry’s final development. In act five, scene four, King Henry IV fights against Douglas, a leader in the rebellion. Just as Douglas is about to kill the King, Prince Henry shows up to defend his father.

    Read More

  • Henry IV, Part 1, by Shakespeare

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hal is the Prince of Wales and heir to the British throne was able to manipulate both the nobles and the court in order to satisfy his needs. Firstly, his ability to speak confidently between the lower class and upper class allowed him to gain authority of many things. In the beginning of the play, Poins tells Hal and Falstaff there is a robbery planned for...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Prince Hal And Falstaff's Henry IV: Part II

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his speech at the end of 1.2, Hal says that he is only spending time in the taverns and with misfits so that when he achieves glory, it will look even greater than it is. However, one might argue that really Hal is scared to take on the responsibility of being a prince and is using the time that he

    Read More

  • Virtue And Fortune In Prince

    913 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Prince, written by Machiavelli is concerned with the issues politics, ruling a state and how a ruler or a leader should be. The key properties of a ruler are represented by Machiavelli in details and the inner and outer effects of the success in ruling are mentioned. One of the most important topics in The Prince is about the relationship of skillfulness (virtù) of the ruler and his good or bad chance (fortune) and their effects on gaining and keeping the power. Virtù, which has the present meaning of manliness, is used by Machiavelli as having skills, strength, intelligence and prudence of a ruler. It is the inner ability to gain the power and not to lose it easily. Fortuna, with the present use, fortune is explained as the word of God and the luck and opportunity that is given to the ruler. A ruler by fortune is dependent

    Read More

  • Essay on Hotspur as Tragic Hero of Henry IV

    1312 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One, the characters' many different conceptions of honor govern how they respond to situations.  Each character's conception of honor has a great impact on the character's standing after the play.  For instance, Falstaff survived because he dishonorably faked his own death, and his untrue claim that he was the one who killed Hotspur may get him a title and land.  On the other hand, Hotspur lies dead after losing a duel for honor.  Hotspur, who is in many ways the ideal man by the standards of his time, is killed by his lust for honor.  In creating Hotspur, Shakespeare has created a variation on the tragic hero of other works: the stubborn tragic hero, who, dying for his fault of honor, does not at last understand his weakness.

    Read More

  • King Henry Iv Part 1

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Still maintained is the conflict between the very format of the text, with Hal and Henry’s conversation held in formal verse typical of the court world, in which Hal is now firmly embedded. Falstaff, however, sustains his equally typical prose speech, which indicates to the audience the enduring division between the court and tavern worlds. As soon as the king leaves, Falstaff immediately proclaims his unashamed cowardice, asking Hal to protect him in battle. The prince retorts with an insult to Falstaff’s enormous size, and abruptly bids him farewell. Gone are the jests that would accompany a conversation between these two at the beginning of the play, and Hal’s reactions to Falstaff now represent his moving away from the tavern world, and that he now belongs to the court world.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Honor Quotes

    576 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, many would view his The idea of honor much like the victor of war, has no true answer, but the most correct observation lays in perspective. Each soldier fights for their own individual cause, while one views the other as dishonorable, they likely view themselves as honorable, as a soldier willing to sacrifice.

    Read More

  • Henry Iv Part 1 Character Analysis

    502 Words  | 2 Pages

    order to convey a positive image of himself, one that has previously been created to be of a slacker. This interpretation of who the public believes Prince Hal to be, shows that he has the ability to create a specific favoring for himself, contrasting the evidence that shows who Prince Hal really is. Within this monologue, Prince Hal is able to reflect on who he truly is and whether or not he can become the King that everyone wishes him to

    Read More

  • Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the start of the play, the reader sees that Prince Hal has been acting in a manner which has disappointed his father. The King compares Hotspur to Hal, saying that Hotspur is ìA son who is the theme of honour's tongue,î and that ìriot and dishonour stain the brow of [Hal] (I.i.3).î He even wishes that the two were switched: ìThen would I have his Harry, and he mine (I.i.3).î The King obviously does not approve of Hal's actions, and believes that, if Hal does not change his ways, he will be a poor successor to the throne.

    Read More

More about Theme Of Honor In Prince Hotspur

Open Document