Theatre Of Cruelty Essay

409 Words1 Page

There is much at stake when delineating the histories of theatre through dramaturges and their dramaturgical practices. There is the perpetual presence of fallacies: a historical rather than historiographical approach, a search for legacies and linearity, and a Darwinian evolutionist lens that paradoxically renders static ‘Theatre’, which is a dynamic in-process event-structure. The mode here is to avoid these pitfalls and through a deconstructive approach tread the dialectic of theory-praxis in Peter Brook’s Theatre of Cruelty. The approach is not a complicated one, albeit transitory and shifting in focus. The shifting nature emerges from the conjuring of Artaud rather than Artaud by the subject (Brooks’ dramaturgy) and my analysis. For us, Artaud will be a symptom of a condition, a trace (characterized by plenitude) of Western metaphysics. This is not a comparative checklist of prescriptivism. This is a search for traces of ideologies in that moment when the abstractions of theatre theorists have to be concretized in the constant liminality of performance. …show more content…

The constant bug of the impossibility of Artaud’s theatre of cruelty presents a cul-de-sac for any syntagmatic possibility in Brook’s approach and consequently, my own. For a theatre and a dramaturge that locates his event-structure in the realm of the Lacanian ‘Real’, there lies a madness of futility. The cruelty of the shadows of theatre is one of death, the domain of the ‘heterogeneous’, and the Other. Madness symptomizes marginalization by language and socialization. Representation becomes the unrelenting sentry for an event that shall never

Open Document